A deterministic simulation study of embryo marker-assisted selection for age at first calving in Nellore (Bos indicus) beef cattle

被引:0
作者
Rosa, Artur J. M. [1 ]
Bijma, Piter
Oliveira, Henrique N.
Lobo, Raysildo B.
van Arendonk, Johan A. M.
机构
[1] Univ Palermo, Dept Entomol Phytopathol Microbiol Agr & Anim Sci, I-90128 Palermo, Italy
[2] Wageningen Univ, Anim Breeding & Genet Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Med Vet, Dept Melhoramento & Nutr Anim, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med Ribeirao Preto, Dept Genet, BR-14049 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
关键词
age at first calving; beef cattle; marker-assisted selection; pre-selection; quantitative trait loci;
D O I
10.1590/S1415-47572007000400008
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We used deterministic simulation of four alternative multiple ovulation and embryo manipulation (MOET) closed nucleus schemes to investigate the benefits of using marker-assisted selection (MAS) of Nellore (Bos indicus) beef cattle embryos prior to transplantation to reduce the age at first calving (AFC). We found that MAS resulted in increased genetic gain as compared to selection without AFC quantitative trait loci (AFC-QTL) information. With single-stage selection the genetic response (GR) increased as follows: GR = 0.68% when the AFC-QTL explained 0.02 of the AFC additive genetic variance (sigma(2)(A),); GR = 1.76% for AFC-QTL explaining 0.05 sigma(2)(A); GR = 3.7% for AFC-QTL explaining 0.1 sigma(2)(A); and GR = 55.76% for AFC-QTL explaining 0.95 sigma(2)(A). At the same total selected proportion, two-stage selection resulted in less genetic gain than single stage MAS at two-years of age. A single stage selection responses of >= 95% occurred with pre-selected proportions of 0.4 (0.1 sigma(2)(A) explained by AFC-QTL), 0.2 (0.3 sigma(2)(A) explained by AFC-QTL) and 0.1 (0.5 sigma(2)(A) explained by AFC-QTL), indicating that the combined use of MAS and pre-selection can substantially reduce the cost of keeping recipient heifers in MOET breeding schemes. When the number of recipients was kept constant, the benefit of increasing embryo production was greater for the QTL explaining a higher proportion of the additive genetic variance. However this advantage had a diminishing return especially for QTL explaining a small proportion of the additive genetic variance. Thus, marker assisted selection of embryos can be used to achieve increased genetic gain or a similar genetic response at reduced expense by decreasing the number of recipient cows and number of offspring raised to two-years of age.
引用
收藏
页码:552 / 559
页数:8
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Superiority of QTL-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes
    Abdel-Azim, G
    Freeman, AE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2002, 85 (07) : 1869 - 1880
  • [2] Normal calves from transfer of biopsied, sexed and vitrified IVP bovine embryos
    Agca, Y
    Monson, RL
    Northey, DL
    Peschel, DE
    Schaefer, DM
    Rutledge, JJ
    [J]. THERIOGENOLOGY, 1998, 50 (01) : 129 - 145
  • [3] A medium-density genetic linkage map of the bovine genome
    Barendse, W
    Vaiman, D
    Kemp, SJ
    Sugimoto, Y
    Armitage, SM
    Williams, JL
    Sun, HS
    Eggen, A
    Agaba, M
    Aleyasin, SA
    Band, M
    Bishop, MD
    Buitkamp, J
    Byrne, K
    Collins, F
    Cooper, L
    Coppettiers, W
    Denys, B
    Drinkwater, RD
    Easterday, K
    Elduque, C
    Ennis, S
    Erhardt, G
    Ferretti, L
    Flavin, N
    Gao, Q
    Georges, M
    Gurung, R
    Harlizius, B
    Hawkins, G
    Hetzel, J
    Hirano, T
    Hulme, D
    Jorgensen, C
    Kessler, M
    Kirkpatrick, BW
    Konfortov, B
    Kostia, S
    Kuhn, C
    Lenstra, JA
    Leveziel, H
    Lewin, HA
    Leyhe, B
    Lil, L
    Burriel, IM
    McGraw, RA
    Miller, JR
    Moody, DE
    Moore, SS
    Nakane, S
    [J]. MAMMALIAN GENOME, 1997, 8 (01) : 21 - 28
  • [4] Genetics then and now: breeding the best and biotechnology
    Basrur, PK
    King, WA
    [J]. REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2005, 24 (01): : 31 - 49
  • [5] BISHOP MD, 1994, GENETICS, V136, P619
  • [6] ECONOMIC APPRAISAL OF THE UTILIZATION OF GENETIC-MARKERS IN DAIRY-CATTLE BREEDING
    BRASCAMP, EW
    VANARENDONK, JAM
    GROEN, AF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1993, 76 (04) : 1204 - 1213
  • [7] Progress on methods of gene detection in preimplantation embryos
    Bredbacka, P
    [J]. THERIOGENOLOGY, 2001, 55 (01) : 23 - 34
  • [8] EFFECT OF SELECTION ON GENETIC VARIABILITY
    BULMER, MG
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1971, 105 (943) : 201 - +
  • [9] Quantitative trait loci for male reproductive traits in beef cattle
    Casas, E
    Lunstra, DD
    Stone, RT
    [J]. ANIMAL GENETICS, 2004, 35 (06) : 451 - 453
  • [10] Efficient production of transgenic cloned calves using preimplantation screening
    Chen, SH
    Vaught, TD
    Monahan, JA
    Boone, J
    Emslie, E
    Jobst, PM
    Lamborn, AE
    Schnieke, A
    Robertson, L
    Colman, A
    Dai, YF
    Polejaeva, IA
    Ayares, DL
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2002, 67 (05) : 1488 - 1492