Cisplatin, epirubicin, and vindesine with or without lonidamine in the treatment of inoperable nonsmall cell lung carcinoma - A multicenter randomized clinical trial

被引:0
作者
Ianniello, GP
DeCataldis, G
Comella, P
Scarpati, MDD
Maiorino, A
Brancaccio, L
Cioffi, R
Lombardi, A
Carnicelli, P
Tinessa, V
机构
[1] G DA PROCIDA HOSP,PNEUMOL DEPT 1,SALERNO,ITALY
[2] NATL TUMOR INST,DEPT MED ONCOL,NAPLES,ITALY
[3] UNIV NAPLES 2,SCH MED,DEPT MED ONCOL,NAPLES,ITALY
[4] F MONAIDI HOSP,DEPT THORAC SURG 2,NAPLES,ITALY
[5] F MONAIDI HOSP,PNEUMOL DEPT 3,NAPLES,ITALY
[6] CITY HOSP,DEPT PNEUMOL,CASERTA,ITALY
关键词
nonsmall cell lung carcinoma; lonidamine; cisplatin-epirubicin-vindesine regimen; toxicity;
D O I
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960701)78:1<63::AID-CNCR11>3.0.CO;2-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Lonidamine (LND) is an indazol-carboxylic acid derivative that selectively inhibits the energy metabolism of neoplastic cells, and increases the permeability of cell membranes. In vitro studies have demonstrated that LND can potentiate the oncolytic activity of cytotoxic drugs and is able to reverse the acquired multidrug resistance of neoplastic cells. Some clinical trials have suggested a synergism of LND with alkylating agents, cisplatin, and anthracyclines in various solid tumors. METHODS. From June 1990 to June 1993, 158 previously untreated patients with Stage IIIB and IV nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled into a multicentric randomized trial to evaluate the addition of LND to a cisplatin-epirubicin-vindesine regimen. Eighty patients in the control arm (A) received cisplatin, 60 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.); epirubicin, 60 mg/m(2) i.v.; and vindesine, 3 mgim2 i.v. (PEV), on Day 1 every 4 weeks, whereas 78 patients in the experimental arm (B) received the same regimen with the addition of LND from 75 mg orally three times on Day 1 to 150 mg orally three times on Day 7+ until tumor progression occurred. RESULTS. The experimental treatment achieved a significantly higher proportion of major responses in comparison with the control regimen (43% vs. 24%; P = 0.02). The addition of LND apparently potentiated the activity of this cytotoxic treatment, particularly in patients with metastatic disease (overall response rate, 39% vs. 17%). The median time to progression (5 vs. 8 months; P = 0.0007) and the median survival time (7.6 vs. 11 months; P = 0.0013) were also statistically improved in Arm B. The acute toxicity of the 2 treatments was low: only 6% of patients in Arm A and 4% of patients in Arm B had to withdraw from treatment due to Grade 4 World Health Organization toxicity. The main additional side effects related to the administration of LND were epigastralgia, myalgia, asthenia, and orchialgia. However, these symptoms were mild and controlled by the concomitant administration of low doses of steroids. CONCLUSIONS. The mild acute toxicity of the PEV regimen and the acceptable and nonoverlapping additional side effects of LND render our experimental therapy worthy of consideration for the management of NSCLC patients with poor performance status or low tolerance to more aggressive therapeutic approaches. (C) 1996 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 69
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [31] Canadian Phase III Randomized Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Conventionally Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Stage I, Medically Inoperable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer - Rationale and Protocol Design for the Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG)-LUSTRE Trial
    Swaminath, Anand
    Wierzbicki, Marcin
    Parpia, Sameer
    Wright, James R.
    Tsakiridis, Theodoros K.
    Okawara, Gordon S.
    Kundapur, Vijayananda
    Bujold, Alexis
    Ahmed, Naseer
    Hirmiz, Khalid
    Kurien, Elizabeth
    Filion, Edith
    Gabos, Zsolt
    Faria, Sergio
    Louie, Alexander V.
    Owen, Timothy
    Wai, Elaine
    Ramchandar, Kevin
    Chan, Elisa K.
    Julian, Jim
    Cline, Kathryn
    Whelan, Timothy J.
    CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2017, 18 (02) : 250 - 254