Feasibility of accelerated whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging using a deep learning-based noise-reduction technique in patients with prostate cancer

被引:15
作者
Tajima, Taku [1 ,2 ]
Akai, Hiroyuki [2 ,3 ]
Sugawara, Haruto [3 ]
Furuta, Toshihiro [3 ]
Yasaka, Koichiro [2 ,4 ]
Kunimatsu, Akira [1 ]
Yoshioka, Naoki [2 ]
Akahane, Masaaki [2 ]
Abe, Osamu [4 ]
Ohtomo, Kuni [5 ]
Kiryu, Shigeru [2 ]
机构
[1] Int Univ Hlth, Welf Mita Hosp, Dept Radiol, 1-4-3 Mita, Minato, Tokyo 1088329, Japan
[2] Int Univ Hlth, Welf Narita Hosp, Dept Radiol, 852 Hatakeda Narita, Chiba 2860124, Japan
[3] Univ Tokyo, Inst Med Sci, Dept Radiol, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato, Tokyo 1088639, Japan
[4] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiol, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
[5] Int Univ Hlth & Welf, 2600-1 kitakanamaru, Otawara, Tochigi 3248501, Japan
关键词
Deeplearning; Denoise; Whole-bodyMRI; DWIBS; FastMRI; Prostatecancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2022.06.014
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the possibility of reducing the image acquisition time for diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) by denoising with deep learning-based reconstruc-tion (dDLR). Methods: Seventeen patients with prostate cancer who underwent DWIBS by 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging with a number of excitations of 2 (NEX2) and 8 (NEX8) were prospectively enrolled. The NEX2 image data were processed by dDLR (dDLR-NEX2), and the NEX2, dDLR-NEX2, and NEX8 image data were analyzed. In quali-tative analysis, two radiologists rated the perceived coarseness, conspicuity of metastatic lesions (lymph nodes and bone), and overall image quality. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs), contrast ratios, and mean apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of metastatic lesions were calculated in a quantitative analysis. Results: The image acquisition time of NEX2 was 2.8 times shorter than that of NEX8 (3 min 30 s vs 9 min 48 s). The perceived coarseness and overall image quality scores reported by both readers were significantly higher for dDLR-NEX2 than for NEX2 (P = 0.005-0.040). There was no significant difference between dDLR-NEX2 and NEX8 in the qualitative analysis. The CNR of bone metastasis was significantly greater for dDLR-NEX2 than for NEX2 and NEX8 (P = 0.012 for both comparisons). The contrast ratios and mean ADCs were not significantly different among the three image types. Conclusions: dDLR improved the image quality of DWIBS with NEX2. In the context of lymph node and bone metastasis evaluation with DWIBS in patients with prostate cancer, dDLR-NEX2 has potential to be an alternative to NEX8 and reduce the image acquisition time.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 179
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Non-Local Means Denoising [J].
Buades, Antoni ;
Coll, Bartomeu ;
Morel, Jean-Michel .
IMAGE PROCESSING ON LINE, 2011, 1 :208-212
[2]   Whole-Body MRI Including Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) for Patients With Recurring Prostate Cancer: Technical Feasibility and Assessment of Lesion Conspicuity in DWI [J].
Eiber, Matthias ;
Holzapfel, Konstantin ;
Ganter, Carl ;
Epple, Kathrin ;
Metz, Stephan ;
Geinitz, Hans ;
Kuebler, Hubert ;
Gaa, Jochen ;
Rummeny, Ernst J. ;
Beer, Ambros J. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 33 (05) :1160-1170
[3]   Improvement of image quality at CT and MRI using deep learning [J].
Higaki, Toru ;
Nakamura, Yuko ;
Tatsugami, Fuminari ;
Nakaura, Takeshi ;
Awai, Kazuo .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 37 (01) :73-80
[4]   Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics [J].
Kanda, Y. .
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 48 (03) :452-458
[5]   Applicability of deep learning-based reconstruction trained by brain and knee 3T MRI to lumbar 1.5T MRI [J].
Kashiwagi, Nobuo ;
Tanaka, Hisashi ;
Yamashita, Yuichi ;
Takahashi, Hiroto ;
Kassai, Yoshimori ;
Fujiwara, Masahiro ;
Tomiyama, Noriyuki .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA OPEN, 2021, 10 (06)
[6]   Deep Learning Based Noise Reduction for Brain MR Imaging: Tests on Phantoms and Healthy Volunteers [J].
Kidoh, Masafumi ;
Shinoda, Kensuke ;
Kitajima, Mika ;
Isogawa, Kenzo ;
Nambu, Masahito ;
Uetani, Hiroyuki ;
Morita, Kosuke ;
Nakaura, Takeshi ;
Tateishi, Machiko ;
Yamashita, Yuichi ;
Yamashita, Yasuyuki .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 19 (03) :195-206
[7]   Deep learning to differentiate parkinsonian disorders separately using single midsagittal MR imaging: a proof of concept study [J].
Kiryu, Shigeru ;
Yasaka, Koichiro ;
Akai, Hiroyuki ;
Nakata, Yasuhiro ;
Sugomori, Yusuke ;
Hara, Seigo ;
Seo, Maria ;
Abe, Osamu ;
Ohtomo, Kuni .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (12) :6891-6899
[8]   Multi-band whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging with inversion recovery fat saturation: Effects of respiratory compensation [J].
Larsen, Solveig Kark Abildtrup ;
Sivesgaard, Kim ;
Pedersen, Erik Morre .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY OPEN, 2021, 8
[9]   Nonlocal Transform-Domain Filter for Volumetric Data Denoising and Reconstruction [J].
Maggioni, Matteo ;
Katkovnik, Vladimir ;
Egiazarian, Karen ;
Foi, Alessandro .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2013, 22 (01) :119-133
[10]   Whole-Body MRI: Current Applications in Oncology [J].
Morone, Mario ;
Bali, Maria Antonietta ;
Tunariu, Nina ;
Messiou, Christina ;
Blackledge, Matthew ;
Grazioli, Luigi ;
Koh, Dow-Mu .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (06) :W336-W349