Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for predictive Reynolds stress transport modeling

被引:18
作者
Panda, Jyoti Prakash [1 ]
Warrior, Hari Vijayan [2 ]
机构
[1] DIT Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Dehra Dun, Uttarakhand, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol IIT Kharagpur, Dept Ocean Engn & Naval Architecture, Kharagpur, W Bengal, India
关键词
Machine learning; Pressure strain correlation; Turbulence modeling; CFD; PRESSURE-STRAIN CORRELATION; RANS PREDICTIONS; TURBULENCE; FLOWS;
D O I
10.1007/s10409-022-09001-w
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The application of machine learning (ML) algorithms to turbulence modeling has shown promise over the last few years, but their application has been restricted to eddy viscosity based closure approaches. In this article, we discuss the rationale for the application of machine learning with high-fidelity turbulence data to develop models at the level of Reynolds stress transport modeling. Based on these rationales, we compare different machine learning algorithms to determine their efficacy and robustness at modeling the different transport processes in the Reynolds stress transport equations. Those data-driven algorithms include Random forests, gradient boosted trees, and neural networks. The direct numerical simulation (DNS) data for flow in channels are used both as training and testing of the ML models. The optimal hyper-parameters of the ML algorithms are determined using Bayesian optimization. The efficacy of the above-mentioned algorithms is assessed in the modeling and prediction of the terms in the Reynolds stress transport equations. It was observed that all three algorithms predict the turbulence parameters with an acceptable level of accuracy. These ML models are then applied for the prediction of the pressure strain correlation of flow cases that are different from the flows used for training, to assess their robustness and generalizability. This explores the assertion that ML-based data-driven turbulence models can overcome the modeling limitations associated with the traditional turbulence models and ML models trained with large amounts of data with different classes of flows can predict flow field with reasonable accuracy for unknown flows with similar flow physics. In addition to this verification, we carry out validation for the final ML models by assessing the importance of different input features for prediction.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
ANSYS, ANSYS FLU 14 0 USER
[2]  
Bardino J., 1983, IMPROVED TURBULENCE
[3]   Deep neural networks for data-driven LES closure models [J].
Beck, Andrea ;
Flad, David ;
Munz, Claus-Dieter .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2019, 398
[4]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[5]   Machine learning models for the secondary Bjerknes force between two insonated bubbles [J].
Chen, Haiyan ;
Zeng, Yue ;
Li, Yi .
ACTA MECHANICA SINICA, 2021, 37 (01) :35-46
[6]   Numerical investigation on fluid forces of piggyback circular cylinders in tandem arrangement at low Reynolds numbers [J].
Chen, Linfeng ;
Dong, Yuhong .
ACTA MECHANICA SINICA, 2021, 37 (04) :599-612
[7]   Turbulence Modeling in the Age of Data [J].
Duraisamy, Karthik ;
Iaccarino, Gianluca ;
Xiao, Heng .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, VOL 51, 2019, 51 :357-377
[8]   Data-Free and Data-Driven RANS Predictions with Quantified Uncertainty [J].
Edeling, W. N. ;
Iaccarino, G. ;
Cinnella, P. .
FLOW TURBULENCE AND COMBUSTION, 2018, 100 (03) :593-616
[9]   Neural network models for the anisotropic Reynolds stress tensor in turbulent channel flow [J].
Fang, Rui ;
Sondak, David ;
Protopapas, Pavlos ;
Succi, Sauro .
JOURNAL OF TURBULENCE, 2020, 21 (9-10) :525-543
[10]   Assessment of supervised machine learning methods for fluid flows [J].
Fukami, Kai ;
Fukagata, Koji ;
Taira, Kunihiko .
THEORETICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS, 2020, 34 (04) :497-519