In vivo serum concentration of vancomycin in antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement for the treatment and prevention of periprosthetic hip infection

被引:10
|
作者
Oe, Kenichi [1 ]
Iida, Hirokazu [1 ]
Ueda, Narumi [1 ]
Nakamura, Tomohisa [1 ]
Okamoto, Naofumi [1 ]
Ueda, Yusuke [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansai Med Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 2-5-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, Osaka 5731010, Japan
关键词
TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; BONE-CEMENT; IMPREGNATED CEMENT; VITRO ELUTION; REVISION; GENTAMICIN; BEADS; IMPLANTS; SPACERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jos.2017.03.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement (ALAC) is used to prevent and treat periprosthetic hip infection, it is unknown how much antibiotic is deposited in the body in vivo, how high the serum concentration rises, or how long its effects last. The aim of this study was firstly to determine the amount of vancomycin (VCM) deposited as ALAC in the body, and secondly to assess the safety and drug elution profile of VCM in ALAC. Methods: We administered VCM to prevent infection after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or to treat patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Patients were classified into two groups: a lowdose group (21 hips) that received primary THA for high-risk cases, revision THA without infection, or one-staged revision THA for infection; and a high-dose group (6 hips) that received cement beads during a two-staged revision THA. The amount of VCM placed as ALAC into the hip was calculated using the remaining ALAC. The serum concentrations of VCM and creatinine were evaluated at postoperative days 1, 4, 7, 14, and 28, and at 3 and 6 months. Results: The mean amount of VCM placed as ALAC into the hip was 0.9 g and 3.4 g for cemented THA and cement beads, respectively (P < 0.0001). The mean serum concentration of VCM from ALAC in the highdose group was significantly increased compared with that in the low-dose group on postoperative days 1, 4, 7, 14, and 28 (P < 0.0001), but it remained within a clinically safe range. No significant differences were observed between the preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine levels of either group. Conclusion: The average serum concentrations of VCM from ALAC were always less than the effective blood concentration, and were detectable until 6 months after surgery. (C) 2017 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:710 / 714
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Antifungal-Loaded Acrylic Bone Cement in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections: A Review
    Anagnostakos, Konstantinos
    Becker, Soren L.
    Sahan, Ismail
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (07):
  • [22] Antibiotic-loaded Acrylic Bone Cement in the Revision of Septic Arthroplasty: Where's the Evidence?
    Patti, Brianna N.
    Lindeque, Bennie G. P.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 34 (03) : 210 - 218
  • [23] Influence of Antibiotic-Loaded Acrylic Bone Cement Composition on Drug Release Behavior and Mechanism
    Chen, I-Cheng
    Su, Chen-Ying
    Nien, Wei-Han
    Huang, Tzu-Tien
    Huang, Chang-Hung
    Lu, Yung-Chang
    Chen, Yu-Jen
    Huang, Gwo-Che
    Fang, Hsu-Wei
    POLYMERS, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [24] The Prophylactic Effect of Single vs. Dual Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement against Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture: An Analysis of the German Arthroplasty Registry
    Szymski, Dominik
    Walter, Nike
    Krull, Paula
    Melsheimer, Oliver
    Lang, Siegmund
    Grimberg, Alexander
    Alt, Volker
    Steinbrueck, Arnd
    Rupp, Markus
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2023, 12 (04):
  • [25] Clinical results and complications of a two-stage procedure in hip infection using preformed antibiotic-loaded cement spacers
    Garcia-Oltra, Ester
    Garcia, Sebastian
    Bosch, Jordi
    Combalia, Andreu
    Soriano, Alex
    Bori, Guillem
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2019, 85 (04): : 516 - 524
  • [26] Vancomycin and Ceftazidime in Bone Cement as a Potentially Effective Treatment for Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Hsu, Yung-Heng
    Hu, Chih-chien
    Hsieh, Pang-Hsin
    Shih, Hsin-Nung
    Ueng, Steve W. N.
    Chang, Yuhan
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 99 (03) : 223 - 231
  • [27] Does the use of a closed-suction drain reduce the effectiveness of an antibiotic-loaded spacer in two-stage exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic hip infection? A prospective, randomized, controlled study
    Xu, Chi
    Jia, Cheng-Qi
    Kuo, Feng-Chih
    Chai, Wei
    Zhang, Ming-Hua
    Chen, Ji-Ying
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [28] Cost Drivers in Two-Stage Treatment of Hip Periprosthetic Joint Infection With an Antibiotic Coated Cement Hip Spacer
    Charalambous, Lefko T.
    Wixted, Colleen M.
    Kim, Billy I.
    Cochrane, Niall H.
    Belay, Elshaday S.
    Joseph, Hayden L.
    Seyler, Thorsten M.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (01) : 6 - 12
  • [29] The cost-effectiveness of antibiotic-loaded bone cement versus plain bone cement following total and partial knee and hip arthroplasty
    Hoskins, Tyler
    Shah, Jay K.
    Patel, Jay
    Mazzei, Chris
    Goyette, David
    Poletick, Eileen
    Colella, Thomas, II
    Wittig, James
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 20 : 217 - 220
  • [30] Lack of Efficacy of Prophylactic Application of Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement for Prevention of Infection in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results of a Meta-Analysis
    Zhou, Yiqin
    Li, Lintao
    Zhou, Qi
    Yuan, Shuai
    Wu, Yuli
    Zhao, Hui
    Wu, Haishan
    SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2015, 16 (02) : 183 - 187