Environmental commitment and innovation as catalysts for export performance in family firms

被引:45
作者
Haddoud, Mohamed Yacine [1 ]
Onjewu, Adah-Kole Emmanuel [2 ]
Nowinski, Witold [3 ]
机构
[1] John Moores Univ, Liverpool Business Sch, Redmonds Bldg,Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L3 5UG, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton Business Sch, Wulfruna St, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, England
[3] WSB Univ Poznan, Al Powstancow Wlkp 5, PL-61895 Poznan, Poland
关键词
Strategic commitment to environmental issues; Product innovation; Process innovation; Quality certification; Export intensity; Poland; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; PROFESSIONAL SERVICE FIRMS; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; LONG-TERM ORIENTATION; PRODUCT INNOVATION; SUSTAINABILITY PRACTICES; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; MARKETING-STRATEGY; MODERATING ROLE; LEVEL EVIDENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121085
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Recognizing the extent of inconclusive findings in the environmental commitment - export performance nexus, this study examines this link in order to reduce theoretical ambiguity. The paper focuses on family firms in Poland and assesses the distinct rate of export intensity resulting from strategic commitment to environmental issues, through product innovation and process innovation. Analyzing a sample of 409 firms sourced from the World Bank Enterprise Survey database, the results indicate that strategic commitment to environmental issues encourages process innovation but not product innovation. In turn, process innovation increases export intensity while product innovation does not. It is also found that quality certifications interact with the relationship between strategic commitment to environmental issues and product innovation. These findings pose important theoretical implications and offer insights to stakeholders particularly interested in the sustainable practices of family firms.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 158 条
[1]   Does Access to Finance Enhance SME Innovation and Productivity in Nigeria? Evidence from the World Bank Enterprise Survey [J].
Adegboye, Abidemi C. ;
Iweriebor, Samuel .
AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW-REVUE AFRICAINE DE DEVELOPPEMENT, 2018, 30 (04) :449-461
[2]  
Alvarez Roberto., 2004, J INT TRADE ECON DEV, V13, P57, DOI DOI 10.1080/0963819042000213543
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Our Common Future
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, EC MARCHE J APPL EC
[5]  
Aragón-Correa JA, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P71
[6]   Measuring the adoption of innovation. A typology of EU countries based on the Innovation Survey [J].
Autant-Bernard, Corinne ;
Chalaye, Sylvie ;
Manca, Fabio ;
Moreno, Rosina ;
Surinach, Jordi .
INNOVATION-THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2010, 23 (03) :199-222
[7]   Organizational innovation, technological innovation, and export performance: The effects of innovation radicalness and extensiveness [J].
Azar, Goudarz ;
Ciabuschi, Francesco .
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2017, 26 (02) :324-336
[8]  
Baginska I, 2019, WORLD SCI NEWS, V120, P168
[9]  
Bank Pekao, 2020, REP SIT MICR MED SIZ
[10]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120