Which Way to High Performance? Comparing Performance Effects of High-Performance Work System Components in Small- to Medium-Sized Establishments

被引:15
作者
Arthur, Jeffrey B. [1 ]
Herdman, Andrew O. [2 ]
Yang, Jaewan [3 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech Univ, Management, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Mayne Pharma USA, Human Resources, Greenville, NC USA
[3] Hankuk Univ Foreign Studies, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
high-performance work system; high-performance work practices; organizational performance; human resource management practices; labor and employment policies; small firms; hotels; HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; FIRM PERFORMANCE; HRM PRACTICES; QUIT RATES; PRODUCTIVITY; INVOLVEMENT; TURNOVER; ARCHITECTURE; EMPLOYMENT; INVESTMENT;
D O I
10.1177/0019793919893668
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The authors examine variation in firm choices to invest in HR practices. They identify three approaches: investments in high-involvement programs (such as employee participation and teams); in high-commitment practices (such as internal promotions and job security); and in ability-enhancing selection and training programs. The authors test the performance effect of these choices in a sample of 165 small- and medium-sized hotel establishments (SMEs). They also consider how job-level differences in skill requirements and customer contact affect the relative effectiveness of these three groups of high-performance work practices. Consistent with the authors' predictions, findings show that, on average, the group of high-commitment practices has the strongest relationship with SME performance. However, the performance effect of high-involvement practices is significantly stronger for front desk jobs compared to housekeeping jobs.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 387
页数:36
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process [J].
Allen, DG ;
Shore, LM ;
Griffeth, RW .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2003, 29 (01) :99-118
[2]  
American Hotel and Lodging Association, 2007, LODG IND PROF
[3]  
American Hotel and Lodging Association, 2015, LODG IND TRENDS
[4]  
[Anonymous], HRM PERFORMANCE ACHI
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Occasional Paper No. 2
[6]  
Appelbaum E., 2000, Manufacturing advantage: Why High-Performance work systems pay off
[7]  
Appelbaum E., 1994, NEW AM WORKPLACE TRA
[8]  
Appelbaum Eileen., 2003, Low-wage America: How Employers are Reshaping Opportunity in the Workplace, P1
[9]   THE LINK BETWEEN BUSINESS STRATEGY AND INDUSTRIAL-RELATIONS SYSTEMS IN AMERICAN STEEL MINIMILLS [J].
ARTHUR, JB .
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1992, 45 (03) :488-506
[10]   HOW TOP MANAGEMENT HR BELIEFS AND VALUES AFFECT HIGH-PERFORMANCE WORK SYSTEM ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION EFFECTIVENESS [J].
Arthur, Jeffrey B. ;
Herdman, Andrew O. ;
Yang, Jaewan .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 55 (03) :413-435