Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade

被引:36
作者
Namekawa, Takeshi [1 ]
Imamoto, Takashi [1 ]
Kato, Mayuko [1 ]
Komiya, Akira [1 ]
Ichikawa, Tomohiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiba Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Urol, Chiba, Japan
关键词
male infertility; obstructive azoospermia; vasectomy reversal; vasoepididymostomy; vasovasostomy;
D O I
10.1002/rmb2.12207
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background In the era of improving assisted reproductive technology (ART), patients with obstructive azoospermia (OA) have 2 options: vasal repair or testicular sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Vasal repair, including vasovasostomy (VV) and vasoepididymostomy (VE), is the only option that leads to natural conception. MethodsMain findingsThis article reviews the surgical techniques, outcomes, and predictors of postoperative patency and pregnancy, with a focus on articles that have reported over the last 10years, using PubMed database searches. The reported mean patency rate was 87% and the mean pregnancy rate was 49% for a patient following microscopic VV and/or VE for vasectomy reversal. Recently, robot-assisted techniques were introduced and have achieved a high rate of success. The predictors and predictive models of postoperative patency and pregnancy also have been reported. The obstructive interval, presence of a granuloma, and intraoperative sperm findings predict postoperative patency. These factors also predict postoperative fertility. In addition, the female partner's age and the same female partner correlate with pregnancy after surgery. ConclusionIn the era of ART, the physician should present and discuss with both the patient with OA and his partner the most appropriate procedure to conceive by using these predictors.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 355
页数:13
相关论文
共 108 条
  • [1] Antisperm antibodies and male subfertility
    Bates, CA
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 80 (05): : 691 - 697
  • [2] INTRAOPERATIVE OBSERVATIONS DURING VASOVASOSTOMY IN 334 PATIENTS
    BELKER, AM
    KONNAK, JW
    SHARLIP, ID
    THOMAS, AJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1983, 129 (03) : 524 - 527
  • [3] INFRAPUBIC INCISION FOR SPECIFIC VASECTOMY REVERSAL SITUATIONS
    BELKER, AM
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1988, 32 (05) : 413 - 415
  • [4] RESULTS OF 1,469 MICROSURGICAL VASECTOMY REVERSALS BY THE VASOVASOSTOMY STUDY-GROUP
    BELKER, AM
    THOMAS, AJ
    FUCHS, EF
    KONNAK, JW
    SHARLIP, ID
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 145 (03) : 505 - 511
  • [5] Bolduc S, 2007, CUAJ-CAN UROL ASSOC, V1, P388
  • [6] Five Hundred Cases of Robotic Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Predictors of Success and Safety
    Bonaros, Nikolaos
    Schachner, Thomas
    Lehr, Eric
    Kofler, Markus
    Wiedemann, Dominik
    Hong, Patricia
    Wehman, Brody
    Zimrin, David
    Vesely, Mark K.
    Friedrich, Guy
    Bonatti, Johannes
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 95 (03) : 803 - 812
  • [7] The impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on outcome of vasectomy reversal
    Boorjian, S
    Lipkin, M
    Goldstein, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (01) : 304 - 306
  • [8] Partial obstruction, not antisperm antibodies, causing infertility after vasovasostomy
    Carbone, DJ
    Shah, A
    Thomas, AJ
    Agarwal, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (03) : 827 - 830
  • [9] Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Initial experience
    Caruso, Robert P.
    Phillips, Courtney K.
    Kau, Eric
    Taneja, Samir S.
    Stifelman, Michael D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (01) : 36 - 39
  • [10] The evolution and refinement of vasoepididymostomy techniques
    Chan, Peter T.
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2013, 15 (01) : 49 - 55