Quantum variational algorithms are swamped with traps

被引:91
作者
Anschuetz, Eric R. [1 ]
Kiani, Bobak T. [2 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Ctr Theoret Phys, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] MIT, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1038/s41467-022-35364-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
One of the most important properties of classical neural networks is how surprisingly trainable they are, though their training algorithms typically rely on optimizing complicated, nonconvex loss functions. Previous results have shown that unlike the case in classical neural networks, variational quantum models are often not trainable. The most studied phenomenon is the onset of barren plateaus in the training landscape of these quantum models, typically when the models are very deep. This focus on barren plateaus has made the phenomenon almost synonymous with the trainability of quantum models. Here, we show that barren plateaus are only a part of the story. We prove that a wide class of variational quantum models-which are shallow, and exhibit no barren plateaus-have only a superpolynomially small fraction of local minima within any constant energy from the global minimum, rendering these models untrainable if no good initial guess of the optimal parameters is known. We also study the trainability of variational quantum algorithms from a statistical query framework, and show that noisy optimization of a wide variety of quantum models is impossible with a sub-exponential number of queries. Finally, we numerically confirm our results on a variety of problem instances. Though we exclude a wide variety of quantum algorithms here, we give reason for optimism for certain classes of variational algorithms and discuss potential ways forward in showing the practical utility of such algorithms.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [51] Reyzin L, 2020, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2004.00557
  • [52] Evaluating analytic gradients on quantum hardware
    Schuld, Maria
    Bergholm, Ville
    Gogolin, Christian
    Izaac, Josh
    Killoran, Nathan
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2019, 99 (03)
  • [53] Shalev-Shwartz S, 2017, PR MACH LEARN RES, V70
  • [54] Variational Quantum Singular Value Decomposition
    Wang, Xin
    Song, Zhixin
    Wang, Youle
    [J]. QUANTUM, 2021, 5 : 1 - 23
  • [55] Exploring Entanglement and Optimization within the Hamiltonian Variational Ansatz
    Wiersema, Roeland
    Zhou, Cunlu
    de Sereville, Yvette
    Carrasquilla, Juan Felipe
    Kim, Yong Baek
    Yuen, Henry
    [J]. PRX QUANTUM, 2020, 1 (02):
  • [56] Wolpert D. H., 1997, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, V1, P67, DOI 10.1109/4235.585893
  • [57] You XC, 2021, PR MACH LEARN RES, V139
  • [58] You XC, 2022, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2205.12481, 10.48550/arXiv.2205.12481, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2205.12481]
  • [59] Variational quantum Boltzmann machines
    Zoufal, Christa
    Lucchi, Aurelien
    Woerner, Stefan
    [J]. QUANTUM MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 3 (01)