Uncertainty in RELAP5/MOD3.2 calculations for interfacial drag in downward two-phase flow

被引:3
作者
Clark, Collin [1 ]
Schlegel, Joshua P. [2 ]
Hibiki, Takashi [1 ]
Ishii, Mamoru [1 ]
Kinoshita, Ikuo [3 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Nucl Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Missouri Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Min & Nucl Engn, Rolla, MO USA
[3] Inst Nucl Safety Syst Inc, 64 Sata, Mihama, Fukui 9191205, Japan
关键词
Drift-flux; Interfacial drag; Downward flow; Two-phase; Uncertainty; BUBBLY FLOW; AREA TRANSPORT; 2-FLUID MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.anucene.2016.01.038
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
RELAP5/MOD3.2 is a thermal-hydraulic system analysis code used to predict the response of nuclear reactor coolant systems in the event of certain accident scenarios. It is important that RELAP and other system analysis codes are able to accurately predict various two-phase flow phenomena, particularly the interfacial transfers between the liquid and gas phases. It is also important to understand how much uncertainty exists in these predictions due to uncertainties in the constitutive relations used to close the two-fluid model. In this paper, the uncertainty in the interfacial drag calculated by RELAP5/MOD3.2 due to errors in the drift-flux models used to close the model is evaluated and compared to the correlation developed by Goda et al. (2003). The case of downward flow is considered due to the importance of co-current and counter-current downward flow for predicting behavior in the downcomer of reactor systems during small-break Loss of Coolant Accidents (LOCAs) in nuclear reactor systems. The overall uncertainty in the interfacial force calculations due to error in the distribution parameter models were found to have a bias of +8.1% and error of 20.1% for the models used in RELAP5, and a bias of 30.8% and error of 23.1% for the correlation of Goda et al. (2003). However this analysis neglects the effects of compensating errors in the drift-flux parameters, as the drift velocity is assumed to be perfectly accurate. More physically meaningful results could be obtained if the distribution parameter and drift velocity were calculated directly from local phase concentration and velocity measurements, however no studies were available which included all of this information. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 240
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, PHYS CHEMESTRY EMGIN, DOI DOI 10.1121/1.418074
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, RELAP5MOD33, V1
[3]   Interfacial drag force in one-dimensional two-fluid model [J].
Brooks, Caleb S. ;
Hibiki, Takashi ;
Ishii, Mamoru .
PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2012, 61 :57-68
[4]  
Chexal B., 1992, Progress in Nuclear Energy, V27, P255, DOI 10.1016/0149-1970(92)90007-P
[5]   ON VERTICAL DOWNWARD 2 PHASE FLOW [J].
CLARK, NN ;
FLEMMER, RLC .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1984, 39 (01) :170-173
[6]   Drift-flux model for downward two-phase flow [J].
Goda, H ;
Hibiki, T ;
Kim, S ;
Ishii, M ;
Uhle, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2003, 46 (25) :4835-4844
[7]   Phenomena identification and ranking table for thermal-hydraulic phenomena during a small-break LOCA with loss of high pressure injection [J].
Griffiths, M. J. ;
Schlegel, J. P. ;
Hibiki, T. ;
Ishii, M. ;
Kinoshita, I. ;
Yoshida, Y. .
PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2014, 73 :51-63
[8]   Axial development of interfacial structure of vertical downward bubbly flow [J].
Hibiki, T ;
Goda, H ;
Kim, SJ ;
Ishii, M ;
Uhle, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2005, 48 (3-4) :749-764
[9]  
Hibiki T, 2003, EXP FLUIDS, V35, P100, DOI [10.1007/S00348-003-0640-y, 10.1007/s00348-003-0640-Y]
[10]  
Hirao Y., 1986, P 2 INT TOP M NUCL P