Facility placement layout optimization

被引:7
作者
Dbouk, Haytham M. [1 ]
Ghorayeb, Kassem [1 ]
Kassem, Hussein [1 ,3 ]
Hayek, Hussein [1 ]
Torrens, Richard [2 ]
Wells, Owen [2 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
[2] Schlumberger, Houston, TX USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Oil and gas field development planning; Oil and gas facility placement; A* pipeline layout; PSO; Cost minimization; Topological complexity; Prohibited areas; OFFSHORE PLATFORMS; LOCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109079
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Optimal facility placement is key in field development planning. However, this process should be integrated with well placement and well trajectory design which poses a real challenge especially early in the field development planning; at the concept screening phase. During that phase, multiple concepts need to be assessed within, typically, a tight project time line. The integrated workflow becomes prohibitively expensive and calls, hence, for a fast and robust method that fulfils the objectives in the context of real onshore and offshore field development planning. Facility placement optimization consists mainly of minimizing the resulting cost while honouring topological complexities and prescribed capacity and trajectory constraints. It aims at selecting the optimal number and location of the different "nodes" comprising the facility and the optimal paths of the connections (pipelines) between nodes. Although many optimization schemes are developed and widely available in the literature, these methods are prohibitively slow with exhaustive search required, or they do not account for the various topological complexities typically encountered in real scenarios. Thus, the deficiency associated with these optimization schemes are drastically limiting in the case of the concept-select phase of field development planning where many scenarios need to be considered; in a relatively short timeframe. Deterministic optimization methods hit memory and computational limitations for all but trivial scenarios and, hence, fail to address the problem. Recently, genetic algorithms were applied with promising results addressing this challenge. In this paper, particle swarm optimization (PSO) is used for facility placement optimization and coupled with the A* algorithm for pipelines layout. This paper illustrates the capability of the implemented modular PSO-based approach for facility placement optimization through various levels of problem complexity: multiple facility layers, topological complexity and prohibited areas. The proposed algorithms are apt to be used in real field development planning projects and are, to be best of our knowledge, the first published material addressing the problem with the required level of speed, robustness and integration.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Well placement optimization using imperialist competitive algorithm [J].
Al Dossary, Mohammad A. ;
Nasrabadi, Hadi .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 147 :237-248
[2]  
Campozana F.P., 2008, INT PETR TECHN C IPT, V3, P1787
[3]   Modular approach for optimal pipeline layout [J].
Dbouk, Haytham M. ;
Hayek, Hussein ;
Ghorayeb, Kassem .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 197
[4]   A genetic algorithm integrated with Monte Carlo simulation for the field layout design problem [J].
de Padua Agripa Sales, Leonardo ;
Pitombeira-Neto, Anselmo Ramalho ;
de Athayde Prata, Bruno .
OIL AND GAS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-REVUE D IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES, 2018, 73
[5]   From Understanding Genetic Drift to a Smart-Restart Parameter-less Compact Genetic Algorithm [J].
Doerr, Benjamin ;
Zheng, Weijie .
GECCO'20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 2020, :805-813
[6]  
Dogru S., 1987, SPE Drilling Eng, V2, P382, DOI [10.2118/10754-PA, DOI 10.2118/10754-PA]
[7]  
Eberhart R., 1995, MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science (Cat. No.95TH8079), P39, DOI 10.1109/MHS.1995.494215
[8]  
Ferreira Filho V., 2006, THESIS U FEDERAL RIO
[9]   Introduction to the special issue: Overview of OLYMPUS Optimization Benchmark Challenge [J].
Fonseca, R. M. ;
Rossa, E. Della ;
Emerick, A. A. ;
Hanea, R. G. ;
Jansen, J. D. .
COMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, 2020, 24 (06) :1933-1941
[10]   A novel version of simulated annealing based on linguistic patterns for solving facility layout problems [J].
Grobelny, Jerzy ;
Michalski, Rafal .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2017, 124 :55-69