Limitations to the spacing effect - Demonstration of an inverted u-shaped relationship between interrepetition spacing and free recall

被引:34
作者
Verkoeijen, PPJ [1 ]
Rikers, RMJ [1 ]
Schmidt, HG [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Dept Psychol, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
free recall; spacing effect; explicit memory;
D O I
10.1027/1618-3169.52.4.257
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The spacing effect refers to the finding that memory for repeated items improves when the interrepetition interval increases. To explain the spacing effect in free-recall tasks, a two-factor model has been put forward that combines mechanisms of contextual variability and study-phase retrieval (e.g., Raaijmakers, 2003; Verkoeijen, Rikers, & Schmidt, 2004). An important, yet untested, implication of this model is that free recall of repetitions should follow an inverted u-shaped relationship with interrepetition spacing. To demonstrate the suggested relationship an experiment was conducted. Participants studied a word list, consisting of items repeated at different interrepetition intervals, either under incidental or under intentional learning instructions. Subsequently, participants received a free-recall test. The results revealed an inverted u-shaped relationship between free recall and interrepetition spacing in both the incidental-learning condition and the intentional-learning condition. Moreover, for intentionally learned repetitions, the maximum free-recall performance was located at a longer interrepetition interval than for incidentally learned repetitions. These findings are interpreted in terms of the two-factor model of spacing effects in free-recall tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 263
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[11]   MEMORY FOR SPACING OF REPETITIONS [J].
HINTZMAN, DL ;
BLOCK, RA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1973, 99 (01) :70-74
[12]  
HINTZMAN DL, 1975, J EXPT PSYCHOL HUMAN, V1, P31, DOI DOI 10.1037/0278-7393.1.1.31
[13]  
Hintzman Douglas L., 1976, Psychology of Learning and Motivation, V10, P47, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0079-742160464-8, DOI 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60464-8]
[14]   INTERPRETING THE EFFECTS OF REPETITION - SOLVING A PROBLEM VERSUS REMEMBERING A SOLUTION [J].
JACOBY, LL .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1978, 17 (06) :649-667
[15]  
JOHNSTON WA, 1976, J EXP PSYCHOL-HUM L, V2, P153
[16]   INTRASERIAL REPETITION AND CODING PROCESSES IN FREE RECALL [J].
MADIGAN, SA .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1969, 8 (06) :828-&
[17]   A short-term perceptual priming account of spacing effects in explicit cued-memory tasks for unfamiliar stimuli [J].
Mammarella, N ;
Avons, SE ;
Russo, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 16 (03) :387-402
[18]   Spacing effects in cued-memory tasks for unfamiliar faces and nonwords [J].
Mammarella, N ;
Russo, R ;
Avons, SE .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2002, 30 (08) :1238-1251
[19]   REPETITION AND RETRIEVAL FROM MEMORY [J].
MELTON, AW .
SCIENCE, 1967, 158 (3800) :532-&
[20]  
PETERSON LR, 1963, J EXP PSYCHOL, P206