Topotecan as second-line therapy for ovarian cancer: Dosage versus toxicity

被引:13
作者
Markman, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1634/theoncologist.10-9-695
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In this issue of The Oncologist, Armstrong et al. present an analysis of the use of topotecan (Hycamtin (R); Glaxo-SmithKline, Philadelphia, http://www.gsk.com) in the second-line treatment of both ovarian cancer and small cell carcinoma of the lung. This cytotoxic agent has clearly been demonstrated to be a useful drug in a population of patients with both of these conditions. However, the description of the nature of the toxicity, as stated in the manuscript, must be questioned along with comments made regarding the relative toxicity of alternative cytotoxic agents frequently used in similar settings. The purpose of this discussion absolutely is not to negate the unquestioned, demonstrated usefulness of topotecan as second-line therapy in ovarian cancer but rather to point out that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved dose level of 1.5 mg/m(2) per day x 5 days can cause substantial and highly clinically relevant bone marrow toxicity. Whether this toxicity, which can result in a level of fatigue that may cause responding patients to discontinue treatment, should simply be labeled "excessive" rather than "cumulative" appears to be a matter of semantics rather than an important distinction. Whether delivery of a lower dose of topotecan (1 mg/m(2) - 1.25 mg/m(2) per day x 5 days) will essentially eliminate concern for the development of severe clinically relevant marrow toxicity is uncertain, but the risk will certainly be substantially reduced.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 697
页数:3
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Hematologic safety and tolerability of topotecan in recurrent ovarian cancer and small cell lung cancer: An integrated analysis [J].
Armstrong, DK ;
Spriggs, D ;
Levin, J ;
Poulin, R ;
Lane, S .
ONCOLOGIST, 2005, 10 (09) :686-694
[2]   The clinical utility of liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent ovarian cancer [J].
Campos, SM ;
Penson, RT ;
Mays, AR ;
Berkowitz, RS ;
Fuller, AF ;
Goodman, A ;
Matulonis, UA ;
Muzikansky, A ;
Seiden, MV .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 81 (02) :206-212
[3]   Treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer: a retrospective analysis of women treated with single-agent carboplatin originally treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel - The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience [J].
Dizon, DS ;
Dupont, J ;
Anderson, S ;
Sabbatini, P ;
Hummer, A ;
Aghajanian, C ;
Spriggs, D .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 91 (03) :584-590
[4]   Recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: A randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus topotecan [J].
Gordon, AN ;
Fleagle, JT ;
Guthrie, D ;
Parkin, DE ;
Gore, ME ;
Lacave, AJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (14) :3312-3322
[5]   TREATMENT OF RELAPSED CARCINOMA OF THE OVARY WITH CISPLATIN OR CARBOPLATIN FOLLOWING INITIAL TREATMENT WITH THESE COMPOUNDS [J].
GORE, ME ;
FRYATT, I ;
WILTSHAW, E ;
DAWSON, T .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1990, 36 (02) :207-211
[6]   Efficacy of low-dose topotecan in second-line treatment for patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma [J].
Gronlund, B ;
Hansen, HH ;
Hogdall, C ;
Engelholm, SA .
CANCER, 2002, 95 (08) :1656-1662
[7]   Potential conflict between fundamental ethical principles and requirements of the oncology drug approval process - Ethical conflict in drug approval [J].
Markman, M ;
DeMarco, J .
CANCER, 2003, 98 (02) :215-218
[8]  
Markman M, 2000, Oncologist, V5, P26, DOI 10.1634/theoncologist.5-1-26
[9]   Continued chemosensitivity to cisplatin/carboplatin in ovarian carcinoma despite treatment with multiple prior platinum-based regimens [J].
Markman, M ;
Kennedy, A ;
Webster, K ;
Kulp, B ;
Peterson, G ;
Belinson, J .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1997, 65 (03) :434-436
[10]   Phase 2 trial of liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m2) in platinum/paclitaxel-refractory ovarian and fallopian tube cancers and primary carcinoma of the peritoneum [J].
Markman, M ;
Kennedy, A ;
Webster, K ;
Peterson, G ;
Kulp, B ;
Belinson, J .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2000, 78 (03) :369-372