Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Clinically Meaningful Improvement After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

被引:19
作者
Kunze, Kyle N. [1 ,2 ]
Polce, Evan M. [3 ]
Ranawat, Anil S. [2 ]
Randsborg, Per-Henrik [2 ]
Williams, Riley J., III [2 ]
Allen, Answorth A. [2 ]
Nwachukwu, Benedict U. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthoped Surg, Div Sports Med, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament; reconstruction; machine learning; artificial intelligence; clinically meaningful; MCID; IKDC; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; HAMSTRING AUTOGRAFT; ACL RECONSTRUCTION; TENDON AUTOGRAFT; FOLLOW-UP; DIFFERENCE;
D O I
10.1177/23259671211046575
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Understanding specific risk profiles for each patient and their propensity to experience clinically meaningful improvement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is important for preoperative patient counseling and management of expectations. Purpose: To develop machine learning algorithms to predict achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at a minimum 2-year follow-up after ACLR. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: An ACLR registry of patients from 27 fellowship-trained sports medicine surgeons at a large academic institution was retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-six variables were tested for predictive value. The study population was randomly partitioned into training and independent testing sets using a 70:30 split. Six machine learning algorithms (stochastic gradient boosting, random forest, neural network, support vector machine, adaptive gradient boosting, and elastic-net penalized logistic regression [ENPLR]) were trained using 10-fold cross-validation 3 times and internally validated on the independent set of patients. Algorithm performance was assessed using discrimination, calibration, Brier score, and decision-curve analysis. Results: A total of 442 patients, of whom 39 (8.8%) did not achieve the MCID, were included. The 5 most predictive features of achieving the MCID were body mass index <= 27.4, grade 0 medial collateral ligament examination (compared with other grades), intratunnel femoral tunnel fixation (compared with suspensory), no history of previous contralateral knee surgery, and achieving full knee extension preoperatively. The ENPLR algorithm had the best relative performance (C-statistic, 0.82; calibration intercept, 0.10; calibration slope, 1.15; Brier score, 0.068), demonstrating excellent predictive ability in the study's data set. Conclusion: Machine learning, specifically the ENPLR algorithm, demonstrated good performance for predicting a patient's propensity to achieve the MCID for the IKDC score after ACLR based on preoperative and intraoperative factors. The femoral tunnel fixation method was the only significant intraoperative variable. Range of motion and medial collateral ligament integrity were found to be important physical examination parameters. Increased body mass index and prior contralateral surgery were also significantly predictive of outcome.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Do outcomes of outpatient ACL reconstruction vary with graft type? [J].
Baverel, L. ;
Demey, G. ;
Odri, G-A. ;
Leroy, P. ;
Saffarini, M. ;
Dejour, D. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2015, 101 (07) :803-806
[2]   How Can We Define Clinically Important Improvement in Pain Scores After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Study [J].
Beck, Edward C. ;
Nwachukwu, Benedict U. ;
Kunze, Kyle N. ;
Chahla, Jorge ;
Nho, Shane J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (13) :3133-3140
[3]   Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Cognitive Computing: What Do These Terms Mean and How Will They Impact Health Care? [J].
Bini, Stefano A. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (08) :2358-2361
[4]  
Brier GW, 1950, MON WEATHER REV, V78, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1950)0782.0.CO
[5]  
2, 10.1175/1520-0493(1950)0782.0.CO
[6]  
2]
[7]   Is Quadriceps Tendon Autograft a Better Choice Than Hamstring Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? A Comparative Study With a Mean Follow-up of 3.6 Years [J].
Cavaignac, Etienne ;
Coulin, Benoit ;
Tscholl, Philippe ;
Fatmy, Nik Nik Mohd ;
Duthon, Victoria ;
Menetrey, Jacques .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (06) :1326-1332
[8]   Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Chondral Injuries After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome [J].
Chahla, Jorge ;
Beck, Edward C. ;
Okoroha, Kelechi ;
Cancienne, Jourdan M. ;
Kunze, Kyle N. ;
Nho, Shane J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (11) :2626-2635
[9]   Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement [J].
Collins, G. S. ;
Reitsma, J. B. ;
Altman, D. G. ;
Moons, K. G. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 (03) :148-158
[10]  
Copay AG, 2018, JBJS REV, V6, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00160