Energy and Environmental Aspects of Using Eucalyptus from Brazil for Energy and Transportation Services in Europe

被引:21
作者
Cavalett, Otavio [1 ]
Slettmo, Sigurd Norem [1 ]
Cherubini, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Ind Ecol Programme, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
biomass; life cycle assessment; pellets; short-rotation coppice; eucalyptus; climate change; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ROTATION WILLOW BIOMASS; GREENHOUSE-GAS REDUCTIONS; WOOD PELLET PRODUCTION; BIOENERGY PRODUCTION; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; COMBINED HEAT; CLIMATE; PLANTATIONS; ELECTRICITY;
D O I
10.3390/su10114068
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The international market of woody biomass for bioenergy is expected to have a major role in future global scenarios aligning with a 2 or 1.5 degrees C target. However, the quantification of the environmental impacts of energy and transportation services from novel technologies and biomass production systems are yet to be extensively studied on a case-specific basis. We use a life cycle assessment approach to quantify environmental impacts of four bioenergy systems based on eucalyptus plantations established in abandoned pastureland in Brazil. The alternative bioenergy systems deliver energy and transportation services in Europe (cradle-to-gate analysis), including modern technologies for production of heat, electricity (with and without carbon capture and storage), and advanced liquid biofuels. We find that all bioenergy systems can achieve sizeable climate benefits, but in some cases at increased pressure in other impact categories. The most impacting activities are biomass transport stages, followed by eucalyptus stand establishment, and pellet production. An estimate of the potential large-scale bioenergy deployment of eucalyptus established in marginal areas in Brazil shows that up to 7 EJ of heat, 2.5 EJ of electricity, or 5 EJ of transportation biofuels per year can be delivered. This corresponds to a climate mitigation potential between 0.9% and 2.4% (0.29 and 0.83 GtCO(2) per year) of the global anthropogenic emissions in 2015, and between 5.7% and 16% of European emissions, depending on the specific bioenergy system considered. A sensitivity analysis indicated that the best environmental performance is achieved with on-site biomass storage, transportation of wood chips with trucks, pellets as energy carrier, and larger ship sizes. Our quantitative environmental analysis contributes to increased understanding of the potential benefits and tradeoffs of large-scale supply of biomass resources, and additional research can further improve resolution and integrate environmental impact indicators within a broader sustainability perspective, as indicated by the recently established sustainable development goals.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   Comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of wood pellet production with torrefaction [J].
Adams, P. W. R. ;
Shirley, J. E. J. ;
McManus, M. C. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 138 :367-380
[2]   Biomass production and energy balance of herbaceous and woody crops on marginal soils in the Po Valley [J].
Amaducci, Stefano ;
Facciotto, Gianni ;
Bergante, Sara ;
Perego, Alessia ;
Serra, Paolo ;
Ferrarini, Andrea ;
Chimento, Carlo .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2017, 9 (01) :31-45
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Off J Eur Union, V5
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, AGR FORESTRY OTHER L
[5]   Life-Cycle Assessment of coal-biomass based electricity in Chile: Focus on using raw vs torrefied wood [J].
Arteaga-Perez, Luis E. ;
Vega, Mabel ;
Rodriguez, Lina C. ;
Flores, Mauricio ;
Zaror, Claudio A. ;
Casas Ledon, Yannay .
ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 29 :81-90
[6]   Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector - Quantifying the Narratives [J].
Bauer, Nico ;
Calvin, Katherine ;
Emmerling, Johannes ;
Fricko, Oliver ;
Fujimori, Shinichiro ;
Hilaire, Jerome ;
Eom, Jiyong ;
Krey, Volker ;
Kriegler, Elmar ;
Mouratiadou, Ioanna ;
de Boer, Harmen Sytze ;
van den Berg, Maarten ;
Carrara, Samuel ;
Daioglou, Vassilis ;
Drouet, Laurent ;
Edmonds, James E. ;
Gernaat, David ;
Havlik, Petr ;
Johnson, Nils ;
Klein, David ;
Kyle, Page ;
Marangoni, Giacomo ;
Masui, Toshihiko ;
Pietzcker, Robert C. ;
Strubegger, Manfred ;
Wise, Marshall ;
Riahi, Keywan ;
van Vuuren, Detlef P. .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2017, 42 :316-330
[7]   Climate, economic, and environmental impacts of producing wood for bioenergy [J].
Birdsey, Richard ;
Duffy, Philip ;
Smyth, Carolyn ;
Akurz, Werner ;
Dugan, Alexa J. ;
Houghton, Richard .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (05)
[8]   Trade-offs between land and water requirements for large-scale bioenergy production [J].
Bonsch, Markus ;
Humpenoeder, Florian ;
Popp, Alexander ;
Bodirsky, Benjamin ;
Dietrich, Jan Philipp ;
Rolinski, Susanne ;
Biewald, Anne ;
Lotze-Campen, Hermann ;
Weindl, Isabelle ;
Gerten, Dieter ;
Stevanovic, Miodrag .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2016, 8 (01) :11-24
[9]   Assessing the Climate Change Impacts of Biogenic Carbon in Buildings: A Critical Review of Two Main Dynamic Approaches [J].
Breton, Charles ;
Blanchet, Pierre ;
Amor, Ben ;
Beauregard, Robert ;
Chang, Wen-Shao .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (06)
[10]   Scaling Relationships in Life Cycle Assessment The Case of Heat Production from Biomass and Heat Pumps [J].
Caduff, Marloes ;
Huijbregts, Mark A. J. ;
Koehler, Annette ;
Althaus, Hans-Joerg ;
Hellweg, Stefanie .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2014, 18 (03) :393-406