Key characteristics of knowledge transfer and exchange in healthcare: integrative literature review

被引:101
作者
Pentland, Duncan [1 ]
Forsyth, Kirsty
Maciver, Donald
Walsh, Mike [2 ]
Murray, Richard
Irvine, Linda
Sikora, Simon
机构
[1] Queen Margaret Univ Edinburgh, Sch Hlth Sci, Subject Area Occupat Therapy & Arts Therapies, Musselburgh, East Lothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Stirling, Sch Management, Inst People Ctr Healthcare Management, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
关键词
evidence-based practice; knowledge exchange; knowledge transfer; literature review; nursing; research implementation; MENTAL-HEALTH; TRANSLATION; IMPLEMENTATION; INTERVENTIONS; POLICY; GAP; DIFFUSION; FRAMEWORK; BARRIERS; PROMOTE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05631.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim. This paper presents the results of a review of literature relating to knowledge transfer and exchange in healthcare. Background. Treatment, planning and policy decisions in contemporary nursing and healthcare should be based on sound evidence wherever possible, but research knowledge remains generally underused. Knowledge transfer and exchange initiatives aim to facilitate the accessibility, application and production of evidence and may provide solutions to this challenge. This review was conducted to help inform the design and implementation of knowledge transfer and exchange activities for a large healthcare organization. Data sources. Databases: ASSIA, Business Source Premier, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Medline and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Review methods. An integrative literature review was carried out including an extensive literature search. English language systematic reviews, literature reviews, primary quantitative and qualitative papers and grey literature of high relevance evaluating, describing or discussing knowledge transfer or exchange activities in healthcare were included for review (January 1990-September 2009). Findings. Thirty-three papers were reviewed (four systematic reviews, nine literature reviews, one environmental scan, nine empirical studies and ten case studies). Conclusion. Robust research into knowledge transfer and exchange in healthcare is limited. Analysis of a wide range of evidence indicates a number of commonly featured characteristics but further evaluation of these activities would benefit their application in facilitating evidence-based practice in nursing.
引用
收藏
页码:1408 / 1425
页数:18
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], OV INT LIT KNOWL TRA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATIO
[3]   The role and theoretical evolution of knowledge translation and exchange in public health [J].
Armstrong, Rebecca ;
Waters, Elizabeth ;
Roberts, Helen ;
Oliver, Sandy ;
Popay, Jennie .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 28 (04) :384-389
[4]  
Baumbusch Jennifer, 2007, Can Nurse, V103, P24
[5]  
Bero LA, 1998, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V317, P465
[6]   Knowledge integration: Conceptualizing communications in cancer control systems [J].
Best, Allan ;
Hiatt, Robert A. ;
Norman, Cameron D. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2008, 71 (03) :319-327
[7]  
Bowen Sarah, 2005, J Health Serv Res Policy, V10, P203, DOI 10.1258/135581905774414213
[8]  
*CAN POP HLTH IN, 2001, ENV SCAN RES TRANSF
[9]   VARIABLES RELATED TO RESEARCH UTILIZATION IN NURSING - AN EMPIRICAL-INVESTIGATION [J].
CHAMPION, VL ;
LEACH, A .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1989, 14 (09) :705-710
[10]  
Conklin J, 2008, CAN J NURS RES, V40, P116