Short-term prediction of particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) in Seoul, South Korea using tree-based machine learning algorithms

被引:48
作者
Kim, Bu -Yo [1 ]
Lim, Yun-Kyu [1 ]
Cha, Joo Wan [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Meteorol Sci, Res Applicat Dept, Jeju 63568, South Korea
关键词
Particulate matter prediction; PM10; PM2.5; Tree-based machine learning; Air quality monitoring; Light gradient boosting algorithm; MEMORY NEURAL-NETWORK; AIR-QUALITY; MODEL; SENSITIVITY; EMISSIONS; FORECAST; CHINA; WUHAN; RATIO;
D O I
10.1016/j.apr.2022.101547
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, highly accurate particulate matter (PM(10 )and PM2.5) predictions were obtained using meteorological prediction data from the local data assimilation and prediction system (LDAPS) and tree-based machine learning (ML). The study area was Seoul, South Korea, and data from July 2018 to June 2021 as well as LDAPS 36-h predictions with 1-h intervals 4 times a day were used. The predicted PM values were then compared with the observed PM measurements to evaluate the prediction accuracy. The PM prediction performance of the Community Multi-Scale Air Quality (CMAQ)-based chemical transport model (CTM) was compared with that reported by this study. The experimental results report that, among tree-based ML algorithms, light gradient boosting (LGB) is the most suitable for PM prediction. The PM prediction results of the LGB algorithm for the hourly test data were: bias =-0.10 mu g/m(3), root mean square error (RMSE) = 13.15 mu g/m(3), and R-2 = 0.86 for PM10 and bias =-0.02 mu g/m(3), RMSE = 7.48 mu g/m(3), and R-2 = 0.83 for PM2.5, and for daily mean were: RMSE <= 1.16 mu g/m(3) and R-2 = 0.996. The relative RMSE (%RMSE) is 21% lower than the results of the CTM model, and R-2 is 0.20 higher. Even in the high PM concentration case prediction results, the algorithm showed good predictive performance with %RMSE = 8.91%-20.43% and R-2 = 0.89-0.97. Therefore, in addition to the CTM, high-accuracy PM prediction results using ML can also be used for air quality monitoring and improvement.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Application of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Earthquakes: State-of-the-Art and Future Challenges [J].
Al Banna, Md. Hasan ;
Abu Taher, Kazi ;
Kaiser, M. Shamim ;
Mahmud, Mufti ;
Rahman, Md. Sazzadur ;
Hosen, A. S. M. Sanwar ;
Cho, Gi Hwan .
IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 :192880-192923
[2]   Prediction and analysis of particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) concentrations using machine learning techniques [J].
Barthwal, Anurag ;
Acharya, Debopam ;
Lohani, Divya .
JOURNAL OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE AND HUMANIZED COMPUTING, 2021, 14 (3) :1323-1338
[3]  
Bergstra J, 2012, J MACH LEARN RES, V13, P281
[4]   A comparison of statistical and machine learning methods for creating national daily maps of ambient PM2.5 concentration [J].
Berrocal, Veronica J. ;
Guan, Yawen ;
Muyskens, Amanda ;
Wang, Haoyu ;
Reich, Brian J. ;
Mulholland, James A. ;
Chang, Howard H. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 222
[5]   Recursive neural network model for analysis and forecast of PM10 and PM2.5 [J].
Biancofiore, Fabio ;
Busilacchio, Marcella ;
Verdecchia, Marco ;
Tomassetti, Barbara ;
Aruffo, Eleonora ;
Bianco, Sebastiano ;
Di Tommaso, Sinibaldo ;
Colangeli, Carlo ;
Rosatelli, Gianluigi ;
Di Carlo, Piero .
ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2017, 8 (04) :652-659
[6]   Particulate matter transported from urban greening plants during precipitation events in Beijing, China [J].
Cai, Mengfan ;
Xin, Zhongbao ;
Yu, Xinxiao .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2019, 252 :1648-1658
[7]   Explore spatio-temporal PM2.5 features in northern Taiwan using machine learning techniques [J].
Chang, Fi-John ;
Chang, Li-Chiu ;
Kang, Che-Chia ;
Wang, Yi-Shin ;
Huang, Angela .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 736
[8]   A machine learning method to estimate PM2.5 concentrations across China with remote sensing, meteorological and land use information [J].
Chen, Gongbo ;
Li, Shanshan ;
Knibbs, Luke D. ;
Hamm, N. A. S. ;
Cao, Wei ;
Li, Tiantian ;
Guo, Jianping ;
Ren, Hongyan ;
Abramson, Michael J. ;
Guo, Yuming .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 636 :52-60
[9]  
Chen T., 2022, XGBOOST CONTRIBUTORS, P1
[10]   Prediction of visibility and aerosol within the operational Met Office Unified Model. I: Model formulation and variational assimilation [J].
Clark, P. A. ;
Harcourt, S. A. ;
Macpherson, B. ;
Mathison, C. T. ;
Cusack, S. ;
Naylor, M. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 134 (636) :1801-1816