Interobserver variability in endoscopic ultrasonography: A prospective evaluation

被引:24
作者
Roubein, LD [1 ]
Lynch, P [1 ]
Glober, G [1 ]
Sinicrope, FA [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS,MD ANDERSON CANC CTR,DEPT GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOL & DIGEST DIS,HOUSTON,TX
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(96)70011-1
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is an imaging modality that is now widely used to stage gastrointestinal malignancies. Few studies have addressed the issue of interobserver variability in the interpretation of EUS, particularly as it pertains to the staging of rectal carcinoma. Methods: Twenty-six patients with a diagnosis of rectal carcinoma were evaluated prospectively by three endoscopists. One performed sigmoidoscopy, the second (primary endosonographer) performed an EUS staging examination with full knowledge of the patient history and sigmoidoscopic appearance of the lesion, and the third endoscopist (secondary endosonographer) performed EUS blinded to this information. The results of the respective examinations were then compared. Results: When the EUS findings of the endosonographers were compared, T stage agreed in 88% of patients, with the following kappa coefficients: T1 (kappa = 0.00); T2 (kappa = -0.04); T3 (kappa = -0.05); T4 (kappa = 0.00). Interrator N stage agreed in 73% of patients (kappa = 0.42). Conclusion: Our study prospectively evaluated interobserver variation in staging rectal carcinoma by EUS. The protocol that was followed provides a useful template that eliminated potential observer bias. Fair agreement was demonstrated regarding lymph node assessment. Although the raters agreed in 88% of the patients, kappa statistic analysis did not reach significant agreement, due to this institution's preponderence of UT3 lesions. Thus, validation of our findings in a setting where a broader spectrum of disease is encountered is required.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 577
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
AKASU T, 1990, Gastroenterology, V98, pA268
[2]   ENDORECTAL SONOGRAPHY - LABORATORY AND CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE IN BRISTOL [J].
BEYNON, J ;
MORTENSEN, NJM ;
FOY, DMA ;
CHANNER, JL ;
VIRJEE, J ;
GODDARD, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 1986, 1 (04) :212-215
[3]   PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF MESORECTAL LYMPH-NODE INVOLVEMENT IN RECTAL-CANCER [J].
BEYNON, J ;
MORTENSEN, NJM ;
FOY, DMA ;
CHANNER, JL ;
RIGBY, H ;
VIRJEE, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1989, 76 (03) :276-279
[4]  
BOYCE GA, 1991, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V37, pA269
[5]  
BURTIN P, 1993, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V104, pA390
[6]   OBSERVER VARIATION AND REPRODUCIBILITY OF ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY [J].
CATALANO, MF ;
SIVAK, MV ;
BEDFORD, RA ;
FALK, GW ;
VANSTOLK, R ;
PRESA, F ;
VANDAM, J .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 41 (02) :115-120
[7]   ASSESSMENT OF DEPTH OF INVASION IN RECTAL-CANCER BY ENDOSONOGRAPHY [J].
FEIFEL, G ;
HILDEBRANDT, U ;
DHOM, G .
ENDOSCOPY, 1987, 19 (02) :64-67
[8]  
Fleiss J. L., 1981, STAT METHODS RATES P, P598
[9]   INTRARECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY FOR PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE DEPTH OF INVASION OF RECTAL TUMORS [J].
HEINTZ, A ;
BUESS, G ;
JUNGINGER, T .
DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1990, 115 (28-29) :1083-1087
[10]   ENDOSONOGRAPHY OF PARARECTAL LYMPH-NODES - INVITRO AND INVIVO EVALUATION [J].
HILDEBRANDT, U ;
KLEIN, T ;
FEIFEL, G ;
SCHWARZ, HP ;
KOCH, B ;
SCHMITT, RM .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1990, 33 (10) :863-868