Performance comparison of nonlinear and linear regression algorithms coupled with different attribute selection methods for quantitative structure - retention relationships modelling in micellar liquid chromatography

被引:22
作者
Krmar, Jovana [1 ]
Vukicevic, Milan [2 ]
Kovacevic, Ana [2 ,3 ]
Protic, Ana [1 ]
Zecevic, Mira [1 ]
Otasevic, Biljana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Dept Drug Anal, Fac Pharm, Vojvode Stepe 450, Belgrade 11221, Serbia
[2] Univ Belgrade, Ctr Business Decis Making, Fac Org Sci, 154 Jove Ilica, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
[3] Saga DOO, Bulevar Zorana Dindica 64a, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
关键词
Mixed QSRR; Molecular descriptors; Machine learning; Retention prediction; Hyper-parameter optimization; MLC; COMPOUND CLASSIFICATION; PREDICTION; QSAR; TOOL; IDENTIFICATION; VALIDATION; BEHAVIOR; TIMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461146
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In micellar liquid chromatography (MLC), the addition of a surfactant to the mobile phase in excess is accompanied by an alteration of its solubilising capacity and a change in the stationary phase's properties. As an implication, the prediction of the analytes' retention in MLC mode becomes a challenging task. Mixed Quantitative Structure - Retention Relationships (QSRR) modelling represents a powerful tool for estimating the analytes' retention. This study compares 48 successfully developed mixed QSRR models with respect to their ability to predict retention of aripiprazole and its five impurities from molecular structures and factors that describe the Brij - acetonitrile system. The development of the models was based on an automatic combining of six attribute (feature) selection methods with eight predictive algorithms and the optimization of hyper-parameters. The feature selection methods included Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF), ReliefF, Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Mutual Info and F-Regression. The series of investigated predictive algorithms comprised Linear Regressions (LR), Ridge Regression, Lasso Regression, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosted Trees (GBT) and K-Nearest neighbourhood (k-NN). A sufficient amount of data for building the model (78 cases in total) was provided by conducting 13 experiments for each of the 6 analytes and collecting the target responses afterwards. Different experimental settings were established by varying the values of the concentration of Brij L23, pH of the aqueous phase and acetonitrile content in the mobile phase according to the Box-Behnken design. In addition to the chromatographic parameters, the pool of independent variables was expanded by 27 molecular descriptors from all major groups (physicochemical, quantum chemical, topological and spatial structural descriptors). The best model was chosen by taking into consideration the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and cross-validation (CV) correlation coefficient (Q(2)) values. Interestingly, the comparative analysis indicated that a change in the set of input variables had a minor impact on the performance of the final models. On the other hand, different regression algorithms showed great diversity in the ability to learn patterns conserved in the data. In this regard, testing many regression algorithms is necessary in order to find the most suitable technique for model building. In the specific case, GBT-based models have demonstrated the best ability to predict the retention factor in the MLC mode. Steric factors and dipole-dipole interactions have proven to be relevant to the observed retention behaviour. This study, although being of a smaller scale, is a most promising starting point for comprehensive MLC retention prediction. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 63 条
[51]   THE BOX-COX TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE - A REVIEW [J].
SAKIA, RM .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES D-THE STATISTICIAN, 1992, 41 (02) :169-178
[52]   Quantitative structure-property relationship modeling of polar analytes lacking UV chromophores to charged aerosol detector response [J].
Schilling, Klaus ;
Krmar, Jovana ;
Maljuric, Nevena ;
Pawellek, Ruben ;
Protic, Ana ;
Holzgrabe, Ulrike .
ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2019, 411 (13) :2945-2959
[53]   Application of planar and column micellar liquid chromatography to the prediction of physicochemical properties and biological activity of compounds [J].
Sobanska, Anna W. ;
Brzezinska, Elzbieta .
JOURNAL OF LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY & RELATED TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 42 (9-10) :227-237
[54]   Boosting: An ensemble learning tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling [J].
Svetnik, V ;
Wang, T ;
Tong, C ;
Liaw, A ;
Sheridan, RP ;
Song, QH .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2005, 45 (03) :786-799
[55]   Random forest: A classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling [J].
Svetnik, V ;
Liaw, A ;
Tong, C ;
Culberson, JC ;
Sheridan, RP ;
Feuston, BP .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2003, 43 (06) :1947-1958
[56]   Performance comparison of partial least squares-related variable selection methods for quantitative structure retention relationships modelling of retention times in reversed-phase liquid chromatography [J].
Talebi, Mohammad ;
Schuster, Georg ;
Shellie, Robert A. ;
Szucs, Roman ;
Haddad, Paul R. .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2015, 1424 :69-76
[57]   Prediction of retention in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography using solute molecular descriptors based on chemical structures [J].
Taraji, Maryam ;
Haddad, Paul R. ;
Amos, Ruth I. J. ;
Talebi, Mohammad ;
Szucs, Roman ;
Dolan, John W. ;
Pohl, Christopher A. .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2017, 1486 :59-67
[58]   A Predictive Tool for Electrophilic Aromatic Substitutions Using Machine Learning [J].
Tomberg, Anna ;
Johansson, Magnus J. ;
Norrby, Per-Ola .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 2019, 84 (08) :4695-4703
[59]   Micellar versus hydro-organic reversed-phase liquid chromatography:: A solvation parameter-based perspective [J].
Torres-Lapasio, J. R. ;
Ruiz-Angela, M. J. ;
Garcia-Alvarez-Coque, M. C. ;
Abraham, M. H. .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2008, 1182 (02) :176-196
[60]   Best Practices for QSAR Model Development, Validation, and Exploitation [J].
Tropsha, Alexander .
MOLECULAR INFORMATICS, 2010, 29 (6-7) :476-488