Water compliance challenges: how do Canadian small water systems respond?

被引:13
作者
Kot, Megan [1 ]
Gagnon, Graham A. [2 ]
Castleden, Heather [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Studies, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Civil & Resource Engn, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Compliance challenges; Drinking water; Public health; Qualitative methods; Small systems; Water quality; DRINKING-WATER; RISK PERCEPTIONS; HUMAN HEALTH; QUALITY; COMMUNITIES; INTERVIEW; CHOICES; SAFETY;
D O I
10.2166/wp.2014.172
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Fundamental to community health and well-being is the capacity to access a sustainable supply of safe drinking water. Small community drinking water systems are the most vulnerable to contamination, and struggle to secure the funds necessary to improve water treatment and delivery systems, and meet increasingly stringent drinking water quality regulations. Little is known of the contextual and cultural differences between communities and the impact this has on regulatory compliance. This study explored the experiences and impact of individual actors within seven small community drinking water systems in locations across Canada. Qualitative, in-person interviews were conducted with water operators, consumers, and decision-makers in each community, and these findings were analysed thematically. Findings from the study show that communities approach and align with compliance challenges in three distinct ways: by adopting regulator-provided or regulator-driven solutions, by adopting an existing improvement framework (i.e. regionalization), or through reinvention to address a new issue or concern. Policy-makers looking to align small communities with appropriate water quality goals may benefit from a consideration of these contextual and cultural differences.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 369
页数:21
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   The value of good quality drinking water to Canadians and the role of risk perceptions: A prelominary analysis [J].
Adamowicz, WV ;
Dupont, D ;
Krupnick, AJ .
JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART A-CURRENT ISSUES, 2004, 67 (20-22) :1825-1844
[2]   Risk perception and bottled water use [J].
Anadu, EC ;
Harding, AK .
JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 2000, 92 (11) :82-+
[3]  
Aronson J., 1995, The qualitative report, V2, P1, DOI 10.46743/2160-3715/1995.2069
[4]   Water Governance in Canada: Innovation and Fragmentation [J].
Bakker, Karen ;
Cook, Christina .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 27 (02) :275-289
[5]  
BARRIBALL KL, 1994, J ADV NURS, V19, P328
[6]   Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: establishing 'rigour' in interview analysis [J].
Baxter, J ;
Eyles, J .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF BRITISH GEOGRAPHERS, 1997, 22 (04) :505-525
[7]  
Bielefeldt A. R., 2012, Final report
[8]  
Braden J., 2004, J CONTEMP WAT RES ED, V128, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1936-704X.2004.MP12800
[9]   What Does "Water Quality" Mean? [J].
Chapelle, Francis H. ;
Bradley, Paul M. ;
McMahon, Peter B. ;
Lindsey, Bruce D. .
GROUND WATER, 2009, 47 (06) :752-754
[10]  
Creswell J. W, 2007, Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches