Diagnostic Value of CA 19-9 and Carcinoembryonic Antigen for Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

被引:85
作者
Xing, Haibo [1 ]
Wang, Jing [2 ]
Wang, Yanling [2 ]
Tong, Mengting [2 ]
Hu, Hong [2 ]
Huang, Changxin [3 ]
Li, Da [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Sir Run Run Shaw Hosp, Intens Care Dept, Xiasha Campus, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Sir Run Run Shaw Hosp, Med Oncol Dept, Xiasha Campus, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Hangzhou Normal Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Med Oncol Dept, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS; TUMOR-MARKERS; CEA; PERFORMANCE; CARCINOMA; ACCURACY; CA19-9; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1155/2018/8704751
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. CA 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are widely used for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. The purpose of the present study was to compare the diagnostic value of CA 19-9 with CEA for pancreatic cancer. Methods. The studies were obtained from electronic searches conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until December 2017. The keywords included diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, CA 19-9, and CEA. The ratio of sensitivity, the specificity, the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the summary of the receiver operating characteristic (SROC) with regard to CA 19-9 and CEA were measured using the random effects model. The current study included 13 studies that comprised 4,537 participants and 1,277 patients with pancreatic cancer. Results. The levels of CA 19-9 for use for the detection of pancreatic cancer were associated with higher sensitivity (ratio of sensitivity: 1.54; 1.31-1.81; P < 0 001), DOR (DOR: 3.50; 95% CI: 2.24-5.45; P < 0 001), and AUC (ratio of AUC: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.15-1.33; P < 0 001) compared with the variable CEA, while no significant difference between CA 19-9 and CEA was noted with regard to specificity (ratio of specificity: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.89-1.06; P = 0 517). The findings of the subgroup analyses suggested that different cutoff values of CA 19-9 and CEA might affect the diagnostic value. Conclusions. The findings of the present study indicated that CA 19-9 levels were associated with higher sensitivity, DOR, and AUC compared with the corresponding levels of CEA with regard to the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models [J].
Ades, AE ;
Lu, G ;
Higgins, JPT .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2005, 25 (06) :646-654
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, GLOBOCAN 2012 V1 1 C
[3]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[4]   A CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF MONOCLONAL (CA19-9, CA50, CA12-5) AND POLYCLONAL (CEA, TPA) ANTIBODY-DEFINED ANTIGENS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF PANCREATIC-CANCER [J].
BENINI, L ;
CAVALLINI, G ;
ZORDAN, D ;
RIZZOTTI, P ;
RIGO, L ;
BROCCO, G ;
PEROBELLI, L ;
ZANCHETTA, M ;
PEDERZOLI, P ;
SCURO, LA .
PANCREAS, 1988, 3 (01) :61-66
[5]   A Conserved Odorant Receptor Tuned to Floral Volatiles in Three Heliothinae Species [J].
Cao, Song ;
Liu, Yang ;
Guo, Mengbo ;
Wang, Guirong .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (05)
[6]  
Carpelan-Holmström M, 2002, ANTICANCER RES, V22, P2311
[7]   The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed [J].
Deeks, JJ ;
Macaskill, P ;
Irwig, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (09) :882-893
[8]   The Prognostic Significance of Pretreatment Serum CEA Levels in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Including 14651 Patients [J].
Deng, Kai ;
Yang, Li ;
Hu, Bing ;
Wu, Hao ;
Zhu, Hong ;
Tang, Chengwei .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04)
[9]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[10]   CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 125 in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant pancreatic diseases with or without jaundice [J].
Duraker, Nuevit ;
Hot, Semih ;
Polat, Yuecel ;
Hoebek, Anil ;
Gencler, Nur ;
Urhan, Nuray .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 95 (02) :142-147