In vivo evaluation of inter-operator reproducibility of digital dental and conventional impression techniques

被引:33
作者
Kamimura, Emi [1 ]
Tanaka, Shinpei [1 ]
Takaba, Masayuki [1 ]
Tachi, Keita [1 ]
Baba, Kazuyoshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Showa Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Tokyo, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
ALL-CERAMIC CROWNS; IMPLANT IMPRESSIONS; 3D SURFACE; ACCURACY; CAD/CAM; SCANNERS; MODELS; FIT; RELIABILITY; PRECISION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0179188
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the inter-operator reproducibility of three-dimensional (3D) images of teeth captured by a digital impression technique to a conventional impression technique in vivo. Materials and methods Twelve participants with complete natural dentition were included in this study. A digital impression of the mandibular molars of these participants was made by two operators with different levels of clinical experience, 3 or 16 years, using an intra-oral scanner (Lava COS, 3M ESPE). A silicone impression also was made by the same operators using the double mix impression technique (Imprint3, 3M ESPE). Stereolithography (STL) data were directly exported from the Lava COS system, while STL data of a plaster model made from silicone impression were captured by a three-dimensional (3D) laboratory scanner (D810, 3shape). The STL datasets recorded by two different operators were compared using 3D evaluation software and superimposed using the best-fit-algorithm method (least-squares method, PolyWorks, InnovMetric Software) for each impression technique. Inter-operator reproducibility as evaluated by average discrepancies of corresponding 3D data was compared between the two techniques (Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Results The visual inspection of superimposed datasets revealed that discrepancies between repeated digital impression were smaller than observed with silicone impression. Confirmation was forthcoming from statistical analysis revealing significantly smaller average inter-operator reproducibility using a digital impression technique (0.014 +/- 0.02 mm) than when using a conventional impression technique (0.023 +/- 0.01 mm). Conclusion The results of this in vivo study suggest that inter-operator reproducibility with a digital impression technique may be better than that of a conventional impression technique and is independent of the clinical experience of the operator.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners [J].
Abdel-Azim, Tamer ;
Rogers, Kelly ;
Elathamna, Eiad ;
Zandinejad, Amirali ;
Metz, Michael ;
Morton, Dean .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2015, 114 (04) :554-559
[2]   Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial [J].
Ahrberg, Danush ;
Lauer, Hans Christoph ;
Ahrberg, Martin ;
Weigl, Paul .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 20 (02) :291-300
[3]   Evaluation of biogeneric design techniques with. CEREC CAD/CAM system [J].
Arslan, Yeliz ;
Nemli, Secil Karakoca ;
Gungor, Merve Bankoglu ;
Tamam, Evsen ;
Yilmaz, Handan .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2015, 7 (06) :431-436
[4]   Dental Arch Relationships on Three-Dimensional Digital Study Models and Conventional Plaster Study Models for Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate [J].
Asquith, J. A. ;
McIntyre, G. T. .
CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2012, 49 (05) :530-534
[5]   Paradigm shifts in prosthodontics [J].
Baba, Kazuyoshi .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2014, 58 (01) :1-2
[6]   Reliability of digital orthodontic setups [J].
Barreto, Monica S. ;
Faber, Jorge ;
Vogel, Carlos J. ;
Araujo, Telma M. .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2016, 86 (02) :255-259
[7]  
Berrendero S, 2016, CLIN ORAL INVESTIG
[8]   Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients [J].
Boeddinghaus, Moritz ;
Breloer, Eva Sabina ;
Rehmann, Peter ;
Woestmann, Bernd .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 19 (08) :2027-2034
[9]   The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow-the comparison of two systems [J].
Brawek, Petya K. ;
Wolfart, Stefan ;
Endres, Lutz ;
Kirsten, Armin ;
Reich, Sven .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 17 (09) :2119-2125
[10]   Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods [J].
Cho, Seok-Hwan ;
Schaefer, Oliver ;
Thompson, Geoffrey A. ;
Guentsch, Arndt .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2015, 113 (04) :310-315