Investigating the Impact of the Flipped Classroom on Student Learning and Enjoyment in an Organic Chemistry Course

被引:11
作者
Dehghan, Shoaleh [1 ]
Horan, Erin M. [2 ]
Frome, Gavin [2 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ, Dept Chem, Washington, DC 20016 USA
[2] Amer Univ, Ctr Teaching, Washington, DC 20016 USA
关键词
Second-Year Undergraduate; Organic Chemistry; Distance Learning; self-Instruction; Collaborative; Cooperative Learning; Student-Centered Learning; Learning Theories; CONFCHEM CONFERENCE; ENGAGEMENT; PERCEPTIONS; PERFORMANCE; CURRICULUM; LECTURE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01104
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
A flipped classroom describes a class where students complete readings and watch lectures outside of class, while in-class time is spent on activities to practice content learned. The implementation of a flipped classroom approach has been shown to increase student learning and student enjoyment of courses. This paper describes using the flipped classroom technique to improve learning outcomes and student interest in an organic chemistry course. We assessed student learning and enjoyment through a student satisfaction questionnaire and comparative analysis of grades. The survey consisted of 14 Likert questions and four open-ended questions. Results of the student satisfaction questionnaire confirm that the majority of students believed that the flipped classroom teaching approach helped them learn better/more, that it improved their learning outcomes, and that they liked it better than a traditional class. The results of grade analysis did not show a significant difference between the flipped and traditional formats.
引用
收藏
页码:2512 / 2519
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Flipping the Classroom Applications to Curriculum Redesign for an Introduction to Management Course: Impact on Grades [J].
Albert, Michael ;
Beatty, Brian .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS, 2014, 89 (08) :419-424
[2]  
Arnaud CH, 2020, CHEM ENG NEWS, V98, P34
[4]   EXPERIMENTS WITH THE MIDDLE RESPONSE ALTERNATIVE IN SURVEY QUESTIONS [J].
BISHOP, GF .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1987, 51 (02) :220-232
[5]  
Bishop JL, 2013, ASEE ANNU CONF EXPO
[6]   Teaching the sophomore organic course without a lecture. Are you crazy? [J].
Bradley, AZ ;
Ulrich, SM ;
Jones, M ;
Jones, SM .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2002, 79 (04) :514-519
[7]   In-Class Versus At-Home Quizzes: Which is Better? A Flipped Learning Study in a Two-Site Synchronously Broadcast Organic Chemistry Course [J].
Christiansen, Michael A. ;
Lambert, Alyssia M. ;
Nadelson, Louis S. ;
Dupree, Kann M. ;
Kingsford, Trish A. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 94 (02) :157-163
[8]  
Cooper J., 2000, NEW DIRECTIONS TEACH, V81, P5, DOI DOI 10.1002/TL.8101
[9]  
Creswell J.W., 2014, Fourth Edition. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative
[10]   High Structure Active Learning Pedagogy for the Teaching of Organic Chemistry: Assessing the Impact on Academic Outcomes [J].
Crimmins, Michael T. ;
Midkiff, Brooke .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 94 (04) :429-438