Adjunctive Intermittent Pneumatic Compression in Hospitalized Patients Receiving Pharmacologic Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboprophylaxis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Fan, Chaofeng [1 ]
Jia, Lu [2 ]
Fang, Fang [1 ]
Zhang, Yu [3 ]
Faramand, Andrew [4 ]
Chong, Weelic [5 ]
Hai, Yang [6 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Shanxi Prov Peoples Hosp, Taiyuan, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Chengdu Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[6] Hofstra Northwell, Zucker Sch Med, New York, NY USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Deep venous thrombosis; intermittent pneumatic compression; meta-analysis; venous thromboembolism; MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN; THROMBOEMBOLISM PROPHYLAXIS; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; MEDICAL PATIENTS; PREVENTION; THROMBOSIS; STROKE;
D O I
10.1111/jnu.12566
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objectives This study assessed the effect of adjunctive intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) on venous thromboembolism incidence in hospitalized patients receiving pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. Methods We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register with no language restrictions from inception until May 15, 2019, for randomized clinical trials comparing adjunctive IPC in pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis and pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism. Two researchers extracted data from published reports independently. A meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the risk ratio (RR) using random-effects models. Primary outcomes were deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Results Eight trials with a total of 7,354 participants were eligible for analysis. Addition of IPC to pharmacologic prophylaxis compared to pharmacologic prophylaxis alone reduced the risk of DVT by 43% (RR 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.93; I2 = 0%), with benefit only seen in surgical patients (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15-0.59; I-2 = 0%) and not in medical patients (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.60-1.07; I-2 = 0%; p for interaction = .008). Addition of IPC reduced the risk for PE by 54% (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30-0.72; I-2 = 0%), with benefit only seen in surgical patients (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24-0.65; I-2 = 0%) and not in medical patients (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.32-2.26; I-2 = 0%; p for interaction = .18) Conclusions Addition of IPC to pharmacologic prophylaxis confers moderate benefit on venous thromboembolism, with benefit confined to surgical patients. For medical patients, there was a trend toward reduced DVT with adjunctive IPC, which warrants further investigation. Clinical Relevance Venous thromboembolism is not unusual among hospitalized patients despite pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. Nursing personnel should use adjunctive IPC in surgical patients receiving pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 405
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical outcomes of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis among patients with intracerebral hemorrhage: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shojaei, Fahimehalsadat
    Chi, Gerald
    Montazerin, Sahar Memar
    Najafi, Homa
    Lee, Jane J.
    Marszalek, Jolanta
    Kaddouh, Firas
    Seifi, Ali
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 212
  • [32] Primary Thromboprophylaxis in Ambulatory Pancreatic Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Frere, Corinne
    Crichi, Benjamin
    Bournet, Barbara
    Canivet, Cindy
    Abdallah, Nassim Ait
    Buscail, Louis
    Farge, Dominique
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (08) : 1 - 16
  • [33] Chemical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in neurosurgical patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Khan, Nickalus R.
    Patel, Prayash G.
    Sharpe, John P.
    Lee, Siang Liao
    Sorenson, Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 129 (04) : 906 - 915
  • [34] Heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Hong-Lin
    Wang, Xiao-Dong
    SPINAL CORD, 2013, 51 (08) : 596 - 602
  • [35] Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in brain tumor patients undergoing craniotomy: a meta-analysis
    Alshehri, Nasser
    Cote, David J.
    Hulou, M. Maher
    Alghamdi, Ahmad
    Alshahrani, Ali
    Mekary, Rania A.
    Smith, Timothy R.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 130 (03) : 561 - 570
  • [36] Effectiveness of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in High-Risk Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review
    Pavon, Juliessa M.
    Adam, Soheir S.
    Razouki, Zayd A.
    McDuffie, Jennifer R.
    Lachiewicz, Paul F.
    Kosinski, Andrzej S.
    Beadles, Christopher A.
    Ortel, Thomas L.
    Nagi, Avishek
    Williams, John W., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (02): : 524 - 532
  • [37] The risk of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a meta-analysis with systematic review
    Bao, Yun
    Wan, Xu
    Fu, Jie
    Wu, Bin
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (04)
  • [38] Comparative study of venous thromboembolic prophylaxis strategies in hemorrhagic stroke: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Maraziti, Giorgio
    Mosconi, Maria Giulia
    Paciaroni, Maurizio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2024, 19 (09) : 973 - 980
  • [39] The effect of intraoperative intermittent pneumatic compression on deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in patients undergoing elective craniotomy
    Qi, Xiang
    Wang, Mengrui
    Feng, Kang
    Ma, Yu
    Zhang, Dan
    Guo, Yidi
    Fan, Yujie
    Jiao, Yubing
    Zhang, Xiaoyu
    Wang, Baoguo
    Shi, Zhonghua
    Sun, Yongxing
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [40] Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism and Benefits and Risks of Thromboprophylaxis After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ho, Kwok M.
    Bham, Ebrahim
    Pavey, Warren
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2015, 4 (10):