Standard atomic volumes in double-stranded DNA and packing in protein-DNA interfaces

被引:39
|
作者
Nadassy, K
Tomás-Oliveira, I
Alberts, I
Janin, J
Wodak, SJ
机构
[1] Free Univ Brussels, SCMB, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] EMBL, European Bioinformat Inst, Cambridge CB10 1SD, England
[3] Univ Stirling, Dept Biol Sci, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[4] Lab Enzymol & Biochim Struct, CNRS, UPR9063, F-91198 Gif Sur Yvette, France
关键词
D O I
10.1093/nar/29.16.3362
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Standard volumes for atoms in double-stranded B-DNA are derived using high resolution crystal structures from the Nucleic Acid Database (NDB) and compared with corresponding values derived from crystal structures of small organic compounds in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD). Two different methods are used to compute these volumes: the classical Voronoi method, which does not depend on the size of atoms, and the related Radical Planes method which does. Results show that atomic groups buried in the interior of double-stranded DNA are, on average, more tightly packed than in related small molecules in the CSD. The packing efficiency of DNA atoms at the interfaces of 25 high resolution protein-DNA complexes is determined by computing the ratios between the volumes of interfacial DNA atoms and the corresponding standard volumes. These ratios are found to be close to unity, indicating that the DNA atoms at protein-DNA interfaces are as closely packed as in crystals of B-DNA. Analogous volume ratios, computed for buried protein atoms, are also near unity, confirming our earlier conclusions that the packing efficiency of these atoms is similar to that in the protein interior. In addition, we examine the number, volume and solvent occupation of cavities located at the protein-DNA interfaces and compared them with those in the protein interior. Cavities are found to be ubiquitous in the interfaces as well as inside the protein moieties. The frequency of solvent occupation of cavities is however higher in the interfaces, indicating that those are more hydrated than protein interiors. Lastly, we compare our results with those obtained using two different measures of shape complementarity of the analysed interfaces, and find that the correlation between our volume ratios and these measures, as well as between the measures themselves, is weak. Our results indicate that a tightly packed environment made up of DNA, protein and solvent atoms plays a significant role in protein-DNA recognition.
引用
收藏
页码:3362 / 3376
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cytoplasmic double-stranded DNA sensor
    Mitsutoshi Yoneyama
    Takashi Fujita
    Nature Immunology, 2007, 8 : 907 - 908
  • [32] Nonlinear waves in double-stranded DNA
    Natalia L. Komarova
    Avy Soffera
    Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 2005, 67 : 701 - 718
  • [33] Double-stranded DNA endcaps.
    Zu, XL
    Bergstrom, DE
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 219 : U42 - U42
  • [34] Recognition of double-stranded DNA by the Rhodobacter sphaeroides Argonaute protein
    Lisitskaya, Lidia
    Petushkov, Ivan
    Esyunina, Daria
    Aravin, Alexei
    Kulbachinskiy, Andrey
    BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 533 (04) : 1484 - 1489
  • [35] Tau protein binding to the minor groove of DNA double-stranded
    Wei, Y.
    Qu, M. H.
    Wang, X. S.
    Liu, Y.
    He, R. Q.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY, 2009, 109 : 312 - 312
  • [36] Nonlinear waves in double-stranded DNA
    Komarova, NL
    Soffer, A
    BULLETIN OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY, 2005, 67 (04) : 701 - 718
  • [37] REPLICATION OF DOUBLE-STRANDED DNA IN VIVO
    KUBITSCH.HE
    HENDERSO.TR
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 1966, S : 216 - &
  • [38] Cytoplasmic double-stranded DNA sensor
    Yoneyama, Mitsutoshi
    Fujita, Takashi
    NATURE IMMUNOLOGY, 2007, 8 (09) : 907 - 908
  • [39] STRUCTURE OF DOUBLE-STRANDED DNA AND RNA
    ERLANDER, SR
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1973, (AUG26): : 132 - 132
  • [40] Bubble dynamics in double-stranded DNA
    Altan-Bonnet, G
    Libchaber, A
    Krichevsky, O
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2003, 90 (13)