Estimation methods developing with remote sensing information for energy crop biomass: A comparative review

被引:57
作者
Chao, Zhenhua [1 ]
Liu, Ning [2 ]
Zhang, Peidong [2 ]
Ying, Tianyu [3 ]
Song, Kaihui [4 ]
机构
[1] Nantong Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Nantong 226007, Peoples R China
[2] Qingdao Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Environm & Safety Engn, Qingdao 226042, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Dept Geog Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Energy crop biomass; Vegetation index; SAR; NPP; Crop height; Data assimilation; LEAF-AREA INDEX; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; HYPERSPECTRAL VEGETATION INDEXES; ESTIMATING ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS; ENSEMBLE KALMAN FILTER; LIGHT USE EFFICIENCY; TIME-SERIES DATA; SPECTRAL REFLECTANCE; PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY; CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.02.002
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The rapid development of remote sensing (RS) technology enables an increased usage of high - resolution, spatial, temporal or spectral, data to extract vegetation information, improve model parameters, and estimate energy crop biomass accurately. Five estimation methods developing with RS information for energy crop biomass are summarized in this paper. Firstly, the statistical analysis with vegetation index can be regarded as the commonest method. But it is faulted for the deficiency of sample data and the vulnerability to the influence of many factors such as cloudy days. Secondly, the longer wavelength makes SAR information popular for crop biomass estimation. But many limitations lead to measurement uncertainty and bring about poor classification. Thirdly, NPP can directly reflect accumulated biomass production through photosynthesis and measure the consequences caused by climate change and human activities. But, actual LUE, the results of environmental stresses such as light intensity, temperature, water, and nutrients, is usually considered as a constant. Fourthly, crop height information is vitally important for biomass estimation. Yet the corresponding application is often subject to many factors e.g. crop variety, growth period, and farmland management practices limits. Lastly, the most promising approach lies in the possibility of assimilating state variables from RS data into CGMs. And the advent of latest instruments with better characteristics offer a unique chance to overcome current limitations. In the end, the main challenges and opportunities for energy crop biomass estimation using RS information in the future are listed.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 425
页数:12
相关论文
共 199 条
  • [1] Generating 3D hyperspectral information with lightweight UAV snapshot cameras for vegetation monitoring: From camera calibration to quality assurance
    Aasen, Helge
    Burkart, Andreas
    Bolten, Andreas
    Bareth, Georg
    [J]. ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 108 : 245 - 259
  • [2] A review of remote sensing methods for biomass feedstock production
    Ahamed, T.
    Tian, L.
    Zhang, Y.
    Ting, K. C.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2011, 35 (07) : 2455 - 2469
  • [3] Ahamed T., 2013, REMOTE SENSING APPL
  • [4] Satellite remote sensing of grasslands: from observation to management
    Ali, Iftikhar
    Cawkwell, Fiona
    Dwyer, Edward
    Barrett, Brian
    Green, Stuart
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANT ECOLOGY, 2016, 9 (06) : 649 - 671
  • [5] Estimating above-ground net primary productivity of the tallgrass prairie ecosystem of the Central Great Plains using AVHRR NDVI
    An, Nan
    Price, Kevin P.
    Blair, John M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 34 (11) : 3717 - 3735
  • [6] EVALUATING LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER DERIVED VEGETATION INDEXES FOR ESTIMATING ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS ON SEMIARID RANGELANDS
    ANDERSON, GL
    HANSON, JD
    HAAS, RH
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1993, 45 (02) : 165 - 175
  • [7] Estimating vegetation biomass and cover across large plots in shrub and grass dominated drylands using terrestrial lidar and machine learning
    Anderson, Kyle E.
    Glenn, Nancy F.
    Spaete, Lucas P.
    Shinneman, Douglas J.
    Pilliod, David S.
    Arkle, Robert S.
    McIlroy, Susan K.
    Derryberry, DeWayne R.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 84 : 793 - 802
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2005, Intro to Microwave Remote Sensing
  • [9] Cloud cover in Landsat observations of the Brazilian Amazon
    Asner, GP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2001, 22 (18) : 3855 - 3862
  • [10] Analysis of dual polarization images of precipitating clouds collected by the COSMO SkyMed constellation
    Baldini, Luca
    Roberto, Nicoletta
    Gorgucci, Eugenio
    Fritz, Jason
    Chandrasekar, V.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2014, 144 : 21 - 37