Assessment the accuracy of dose calculation in build-up region for two radiotherapy treatment planning systems

被引:6
作者
Farhood, Bagher [1 ]
Toossi, Mohammad Taghi Bahreyni [2 ]
Ghorbani, Mahdi [2 ]
Salari, Elahe [3 ]
Knaup, Courtney [4 ]
机构
[1] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Fac Med, Dept Med Phys, Vakil Abad Blvd, Mashhad, Iran
[2] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Med Phys Res Ctr, Mashhad, Iran
[3] Reza Radiat Oncol Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Mashhad, Iran
[4] Comprehens Canc Ctr Nevada, Las Vegas, NV USA
关键词
Build-up region; confidence limit; dose calculation accuracy; treatment planning system; ENERGY PHOTON BEAMS; ELECTRON CONTAMINATION; SURFACE; ALGORITHMS; DOSIMETRY; THERAPY; HEAD;
D O I
10.4103/0973-1482.176421
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: Our objective is to quantify dose calculation accuracy in the build-up region using TiGRT and Prowess Panther treatment planning systems (TPSs). Materials and Methods: Thermoluminescent dosimeter-100 chips were used in a phantom for dose measurement. TiGRT Version 1.2 (LinaTech, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and Prowess Panther version 5.1 (Prowess Inc., Concord, CA, USA) TPSs were also used for dose calculations. Finally, the confidence limit values obtained to quantify dose calculation accuracy of the TPSs at build-up region for different field sizes and various gantry angles. Results: For 8 cm x 10 cm, 10 cm x 10 cm, and 15 cm x 10 cm field sizes, the confidence limit values for TiGRT TPS were 16.64, 16.56, and 25.85; for Prowess TPS with fast photon effective (FPE) algorithm were 15.17, 14.22, and 9.73; and for Prowess TPS with collapsed cone convolution superposition (CCCS) algorithm were 10.53, 9.97, and 9.76, respectively. For wedged field with gantry angles of 15 degrees, 30 degrees, and 60 degrees, the confidence limit values for TiGRT TPS were 12.11, 12.96, and 22.69 and for Prowess TPS with FPE algorithm were 24.50, 22.07, and 7.82, respectively. Conclusions: It is concluded that for open field sizes without gantry angulation, dose calculation accuracy in Prowess TPS with CCCS algorithm is better than TiGRT and Prowess TPSs with FPE algorithm. Furthermore, it is concluded that for wedged field with large gantry angle, dose calculation accuracy of Prowess TPS with FPE algorithm is better than TiGRT TPS while, for medium and small gantry angles, dose calculation accuracy of TiGRT TPS is better than Prowess TPS with FPE algorithm.
引用
收藏
页码:968 / 973
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   The effect of different lung densities on the accuracy of various radiotherapy dose calculation methods: Implications for tumour coverage [J].
Aarup, Lasse Rye ;
Nahum, Alan E. ;
Zacharatou, Christina ;
Juhler-Nottrup, Trine ;
Knoos, Tommy ;
Nystrom, Hakan ;
Specht, Lena ;
Wieslander, Elinore ;
Korreman, Stine S. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 91 (03) :405-414
[2]   Evaluation of superficial dosimetry between treatment planning system and measurement for several breast cancer treatment techniques [J].
Akino, Yuichi ;
Das, Indra J. ;
Bartlett, Gregory K. ;
Zhang, Hualin ;
Thompson, Elizabeth ;
Zook, Jennifer E. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (01)
[3]  
Andreo P, 2004, TECHNICAL REPORT SER, V430
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, 1540 TECDOC INT AT E
[5]  
Baird C T, 2001, J Appl Clin Med Phys, V2, P73, DOI 10.1120/1.1359296
[6]   CHARACTERISTICS OF CONTAMINATION ELECTRONS IN HIGH-ENERGY PHOTON BEAMS [J].
BEAUVAIS, H ;
BRIDIER, A ;
DUTREIX, A .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1993, 29 (03) :308-316
[7]   AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE PRESENCE OF SECONDARY ELECTRONS IN MEGAVOLTAGE PHOTON BEAMS [J].
BIGGS, PJ ;
RUSSELL, MD .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1983, 28 (09) :1033-1043
[8]   Comparison of doses calculated by the Monte Carlo method and measured by Lif TLD in the buildup region for a 60Co photon beam [J].
Budanec, M. ;
Knezevic, Z. ;
Bokulic, T. ;
Mrcela, I. ;
Vrtar, M. ;
Vekic, B. ;
Kusic, Z. .
APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2008, 66 (12) :1925-1929
[9]   Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium [J].
Carrasco, P ;
Jornet, N ;
Duch, MA ;
Weber, L ;
Ginjaume, M ;
Eudaldo, T ;
Jurado, D ;
Ruiz, A ;
Ribas, M .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (10) :2899-2911