Operationalization of Community-Based Participatory Research Principles: Assessment of the National Cancer Institute's Community Network Programs

被引：60

作者：

Braun, Kathryn L. ^{[1
,2
]}

Nguyen, Tung T. ^{[3
]}

Tanjasiri, Sora Park ^{[4
]}

Campbell, Janis ^{[5
]}

Heiney, Sue P. ^{[6
]}

Brandt, Heather M. ^{[7
]}

Smith, Selina A. ^{[9
]}

Blumenthal, Daniel S. ^{[9
]}

Hargreaves, Margaret ^{[10
]}

Coe, Kathryn ^{[11
]}

Ma, Grace X. ^{[12
]}

Kenerson, Donna ^{[10
]}

Patel, Kushal ^{[10
]}

Tsark, JoAnn ^{[1
]}

Hebert, James R. ^{[8
]}

机构：

[1] Papa Ola Lokahi, Imi Hale Native Hawaiian Canc Network, Honolulu, HI 96813 USA

[2] Univ Hawaii, John A Burns Sch Med, Off Publ Hlth Studies, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA

[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, San Francisco, CA USA

[4] Calif State Univ Fullerton, Dept Hlth Sci, Fullerton, CA 92634 USA

[5] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Oklahoma City, OK USA

[6] Univ S Carolina, Coll Nursing, Columbia, SC 29208 USA

[7] Univ S Carolina, Dept Hlth Promot Educ & Behav, Columbia, SC 29208 USA

[8] Univ S Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Columbia, SC 29208 USA

[9] Morehouse Sch Med, Dept Community Hlth & Prevent Med, Atlanta, GA 30310 USA

[10] Meharry Med Coll, Dept Internal Med, Nashville, TN 37208 USA

[11] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA

[12] Temple Univ, Coll Hlth Profess, Dept Publ Hlth, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA

来源：

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH | 2012年 / 102卷 / 06期

关键词：

CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; HEALTH; INITIATIVES; DISPARITIES; TUSKEGEE; SCIENCE;

D O I：

10.2105/AJPH.2011.300304

中图分类号：

R1 [预防医学、卫生学];

学科分类号：

1004 ; 120402 ;

摘要：

Objectives. We examined how National Cancer Institute funded Community Network Programs (CNPs) operationalized principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR). Methods. We reviewed the literature and extant CBPR measurement tools. On the basis of that review, we developed a 27-item questionnaire for CNPs to self-assess their operationalization of 9 CBPR principles. Our team comprised representatives of 9 of the National Cancer Institute's 25 CNPs. Results. Of the 25 CNPs, 22 (88%) completed the questionnaire. Most scored well on CBPR principles of recognizing community as a unit of identity, building on community strengths, facilitating colearning, embracing iterative processes in developing community capacity, and achieving a balance between data generation and intervention. CNPs varied in the extent to which they employed CBPR principles of addressing determinants of health, sharing power among partners, engaging the community in research dissemination, and striving for sustainability. Conclusions. Although the development of assessment tools in this field is in its infancy, our findings suggest that fidelity to CBPR processes can be assessed in a variety of settings. (Am J Public Health. 2012;102:1195-1203. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300304)

引用

页码：1195 / 1203

页数：9

共 34 条

[1] Challenges in Sustaining Public Health Interventions [J].

Altman, David G. .

HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2009, 36 (01) :24-28

[2]

[Anonymous], 2007, United States Cancer Statistics-2004 incidence and mortality

[3]

[Anonymous], 2000, Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health

[4]

[Anonymous], 2004, AHRQ EVIDENCE REPORT

[5]

[Anonymous], 2003, COMMUNITY BASED PART

[6]

Burhansstipanov Linda, 2005, Cancer Control, V12 Suppl 2, P70

[7] Construct validity of the Attitudes About Reality Scale [J].

Evans, WJ .

PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2000, 86 (03) :738-744

[8]

Fong M., 2003, CALIFORNIAN J HLTH P, V1, P136, DOI [10.32398/cjhp.v1iSI.565, DOI 10.32398/CJHP.V1ISI.565]

[9]

Frieden Thomas R, 2011, MMWR Suppl, V60, P1

[10]

Gottlieb B, 2009, TOWARD THE ELIMINATION OF CANCER DISPARITIES: CLINICAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, P317, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-89443-0_14

← 1 2 3 4 →