Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children

被引:5
作者
Omran, Mohamed [1 ]
Sakr, Ahmed [1 ]
Desoky, Esam A. E. [1 ]
Ali, Maged M. [1 ]
Abdalla, Mohamed M. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Zagazig Univ, Dept Urol, Fac Med, Zagazig, Egypt
关键词
Paediatric; ureteroscopy; shockwaves; laser; upper urinary tract; ASSOCIATION/ENDOUROLOGICAL SOCIETY GUIDELINE; WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; ENDOUROLOGICAL MANAGEMENT; PEDIATRIC UROLITHIASIS; EXPERIENCE; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1080/2090598X.2020.1738105
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS) with holmium (Ho)-yttrium-aluminium-garnet (YAG) laser lithotripsy vs shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for treating upper urinary tract (UUT) calculi >1 cm in children. Patients and methods: Children with unilateral single UUT ureteric stones of >1 cm were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1, treated with SWL; and Group 2, treated with URS (6/7.5 F) and laser lithotripsy. The patients' characteristics, stones demographics, operative time, adjunctive procedures, stone-free rate (SFR), re-treatment rate, and complications were statistically analysed and compared. Success was defined as stone-free status (no stone residual of >= 0.3 cm) at 1 month from the initial treatment without any auxiliary procedures. Results: In all, 68 patients with UUT stones met our inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences between the two groups for patient or stone demographics. In Group 1, the SFR was 26/34 (76.4%) and in Group 2 it was 33/34 (97.1%) (P = 0.03). A total of 12 auxiliary procedures in Group 1 and two in Group 2 were needed to reach a 100% SFR (P = 0.014). There were no significant differences between the two groups for operative times, adjunctive procedures, number of complicated cases or complications of Grade >= III (P = 0.65, P = 0.23, P = 0.77, and P = 0.62, respectively). Conclusion: Miniature semi-rigid URS with Ho-YAG laser lithotripsy for UUT ureteric stones of >1 cm in children was more effective than SWL in terms of SFR and re-treatment rate, with no significant difference in the rate or grade of complications.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 111
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children:: experience using a mpl-9000 lithotriptor [J].
Aksoy, Y ;
Özbey, I ;
Atmaca, AF ;
Polat, Ö .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 22 (02) :115-119
[2]  
Assimos D, 2016, J UROLOGY, V196, P1161, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091
[3]   Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I [J].
Assimos, Dean ;
Krambeck, Amy ;
Miller, Nicole L. ;
Monga, Manoj ;
Murad, M. Hassan ;
Nelson, Caleb P. ;
Pace, Kenneth T. ;
Pais, Vernon M., Jr. ;
Pearle, Margaret S. ;
Preminger, Glenn M. ;
Razvi, Hassan ;
Shah, Ojas ;
Matlaga, Brian R. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (04) :1153-1160
[4]   Comparison of a 4.5 F semi-rigid ureteroscope with a 7.5 F rigid ureteroscope in the treatment of ureteral stones in preschool-age children [J].
Atar, Murat ;
Sancaktutar, Ahmet Ali ;
Penbegul, Necmettin ;
Soylemez, Haluk ;
Bodakci, Mehmet Nuri ;
Hatipoglu, Namik Kemal ;
Bozkurt, Yasar ;
Cakmakci, Suleyman .
UROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 40 (06) :733-738
[5]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[6]   What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review [J].
Drake, Tamsin ;
Grivas, Nikolaos ;
Dabestani, Saeed ;
Knoll, Thomas ;
Lam, Thomas ;
Maclennan, Steven ;
Petrik, Ales ;
Skolarikos, Andreas ;
Straub, Michael ;
Tuerk, Christian ;
Yuan, Cathy Yuhong ;
Sarica, Kemal .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (05) :772-786
[7]   Outcome of ureteroscopy for treatment of pediatric ureteral stones [J].
Galal, Ehab Mohamad ;
El-Bab, Tarek Khalaf Fath ;
Abdelhamid, Amr Mohamad .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2013, 9 (04) :476-478
[8]   Comparison of Patient Satisfaction with Treatment Outcomes between Ureteroscopy and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteral Stones [J].
Lee, Jong-Hyun ;
Woo, Seung Hyo ;
Kim, Eun Tak ;
Kim, Dae Kyung ;
Park, Jinsung .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 51 (11) :788-793
[9]   Pediatric extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: Predicting successful outcomes [J].
McAdams, Sean ;
Shukla, Aseem R. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 26 (04) :544-548
[10]   Ureteroscopy is safe and effective in prepubertal children [J].
Minevich, E ;
DeFoor, W ;
Reddy, P ;
Nishinaka, K ;
Wacksman, J ;
Sheldon, C ;
Erhard, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (01) :276-279