VALUE OF DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING FOR PREDICTION AND EARLY ASSESSMENT OF RESPONSE TO NEOADJUVANT RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY IN RECTAL CANCER: PRELIMINARY RESULTS

被引:165
作者
Lambrecht, Maarten [1 ]
Vandecaveye, Vincent [2 ]
De Keyzer, Frederik [2 ]
Roels, Sarah [1 ]
Penninckx, Freddy [3 ]
Van Cutsem, Eric [4 ]
Filip, Claus [2 ]
Haustermans, Karin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Radiat Oncol, Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Radiol, Louvain, Belgium
[3] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Abdominal Surg, Louvain, Belgium
[4] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Digest Oncol, Louvain, Belgium
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2012年 / 82卷 / 02期
关键词
Response prediction; Rectal cancer; Functional imaging; Diffusion; RADIATION-THERAPY; TUMOR RESPONSE; CHEMORADIATION THERAPY; PREOPERATIVE RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY; NECK TUMORS; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA; HEAD; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.063
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) for response prediction before and response assessment during and early after preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Methods and Materials: Twenty patients receiving RCT for LARC underwent MRI including DWI before RCT, after 10-15 fractions and 1 to 2 weeks before surgery. Tumor volume and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC; b-values: 0-1000 s/mm(2)) were determined at all time points. Pretreatment tumor ADC and volume, tumor ADC change (Delta ADC), and volume change (Delta V) between pretreatment and follow-up examinations were compared with histopathologic findings after total mesorectal excision (pathologic complete response [pCR] vs. no pCR, ypT0-2 vs. ypT3-4, T-downstaging or not). The discriminatory capability of pretreatment tumor ADC and volume, Delta ADC, and Delta V for the detection of pCR was compared with receiver operating characteristics analysis. Results: Pretreatment ADC was significantly lower in patients with pCR compared with patients without (in mm(2)/s: 0.94 +/- 0.12 x 10(-3) vs. 1.19 +/- 0.22 x 10(-3),p = 0.003), yielding a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 86% for detection of pCR. The volume reduction during and after RCT was significantly higher in patients with pCR compared with patients without (in %: Delta V-during: -62 +/- 16 vs. -33 +/- 16, respectively, p = 0.015; and Delta V-post: -86 +/- 12 vs. -60 +/- 21, p = 0.012), yielding a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 71% for the Delta V-during and, respectively, 83% and 86% for the Delta V-post. The Delta ADC during (Delta ADC(during)) and after RCT (Delta ADC(post)) showed a significantly higher value in patients with pCR compared with patients without (in %: Delta ADC(during): 72 +/- 14 vs. 16 +/- 12, p = 0.0006; and Delta ADC(post): 88 +/- 35 vs. 26 +/- 19,p = 0.0011), yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for the Delta ADC(during) and, respectively, 100% and 93% for the Delta ADC(post). Conclusions: These initial findings indicate that DWI, using pretreatment ADC, Delta ADC(during), and Delta ADC(post) may be useful for prediction and early assessment of pathologic response to preoperative RCT of LARC, with higher accuracy than volumetric measurements. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:863 / 870
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Cancer Biomarker: Consensus and Recommendations
    不详
    [J]. NEOPLASIA, 2009, 11 (02): : 102 - 125
  • [2] Restaging Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer with MR Imaging after Chemoradiation Therapy
    Barbaro, Brunella
    Vitale, Renata
    Leccisotti, Lucia
    Vecchio, Fabio M.
    Santoro, Luisa
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    Coco, Claudio
    Pacelli, Fabio
    Crucitti, Antonio
    Persiani, Roberto
    Bonomo, Lorenzo
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2010, 30 (03) : 699 - U12
  • [3] Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: MR Imaging in Prediction of Response after Preoperative Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy
    Barbaro, Brunella
    Fiorucci, Cecilia
    Tebala, Carmen
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta
    Vecchio, Fabio Maria
    Rizzo, Gianluca
    Coco, Claudio
    Crucitti, Antonio
    Ratto, Carlo
    Bonomo, Lorenzo
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2009, 250 (03) : 730 - 739
  • [4] Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery
    Beets-Tan, RGH
    Beets, GL
    Vliegen, RFA
    Kessels, AGH
    Van Boven, H
    De Bruine, A
    von Meyenfeldt, MF
    Baeten, CGMI
    van Engelshoven, JMA
    [J]. LANCET, 2001, 357 (9255) : 497 - 504
  • [5] Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer
    Bosset, Jean-Francois
    Collette, Laurence
    Calais, Gilles
    Mineur, Laurent
    Maingon, Philippe
    Radosevic-Jelic, Ljiljana
    Daban, Alain
    Bardet, Etienne
    Beny, Alexander
    Ollier, Jean-Claude
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (11) : 1114 - 1123
  • [6] Rectal carcinoma: Thin-section MR imaging for staging in 28 patients
    Brown, G
    Richards, CJ
    Newcombe, RG
    Dallimore, NS
    Radcliffe, AG
    Carey, DP
    Bourne, MW
    Williams, GT
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (01) : 215 - 222
  • [7] Cascini GL, 2006, J NUCL MED, V47, P1241
  • [8] How accurate is magnetic resonance imaging in restaging rectal cancer in patients receiving preoperative combined chemoradiotherapy?
    Chen, CC
    Lee, RC
    Lin, JK
    Wang, LW
    Yang, SH
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (04) : 722 - 728
  • [9] Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: an early surrogate marker of therapeutic efficacy in brain tumors
    Chenevert, TL
    Stegman, LD
    Taylor, JMG
    Robertson, PL
    Greenberg, HS
    Rehemtulla, A
    Ross, BD
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (24): : 2029 - 2036
  • [10] Apparent diffusion coefficient: Potential imaging biomarker for prediction and early detection of response to chemotherapy in hepatic metastases
    Cui, Yong
    Zhang, Xiao-Peng
    Sun, Ying-Shi
    Tang, Lei
    Shen, Lin
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2008, 248 (03) : 894 - 900