Half of germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants found on panel tests do not fulfil NHS testing criteria

被引:11
作者
Andoni, Tala [1 ]
Wiggins, Jennifer [2 ]
Robinson, Rachel [3 ]
Charlton, Ruth [3 ]
Sandberg, Michael [4 ]
Eeles, Rosalind [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res, London, England
[2] Royal Marsden Hosp, London, England
[3] St James Univ Hosp, Leeds Genet Lab, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] 90 Sloane St, London, England
关键词
REPORTED FAMILY-HISTORY; BREAST-CANCER; OVARIAN-CANCER; AMERICAN SOCIETY; RISK; MUTATIONS; SUSCEPTIBILITY; BRCA1; HERITABILITY; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-022-06376-4
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Genetic testing for cancer predisposition has been curtailed by the cost of sequencing, and testing has been restricted by eligibility criteria. As the cost of sequencing decreases, the question of expanding multi-gene cancer panels to a broader population arises. We evaluated how many additional actionable genetic variants are returned by unrestricted panel testing in the private sector compared to those which would be returned by adhering to current NHS eligibility criteria. We reviewed 152 patients referred for multi-gene cancer panels in the private sector between 2014 and 2016. Genetic counselling and disclosure of all results was standard of care provided by the Consultant. Every panel conducted was compared to current eligibility criteria. A germline pathogenic / likely pathogenic variant (P/LP), in a gene relevant to the personal or family history of cancer, was detected in 15 patients (detection rate of 10%). 46.7% of those found to have the P/LP variants (7 of 15), or 4.6% of the entire set (7 of 152), did not fulfil NHS eligibility criteria. 46.7% of P/LP variants in this study would have been missed by national testing guidelines, all of which were actionable. However, patients who do not fulfil eligibility criteria have a higher Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) burden. We demonstrated that the current England NHS threshold for genetic testing is missing pathogenic variants which would alter management in 4.6%, nearly 1 in 20 individuals. However, the clinical service burden that would ensue is a detection of VUS of 34%.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 78 条
[61]   MutYH mutation carriers have increased breast cancer risk [J].
Rennert, Gad ;
Lejbkowicz, Flavio ;
Cohen, Ilana ;
Pinchev, Mila ;
Rennert, Hedy S. ;
Barnett-Griness, Ofra .
CANCER, 2012, 118 (08) :1989-1993
[62]   Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology [J].
Richards, Sue ;
Aziz, Nazneen ;
Bale, Sherri ;
Bick, David ;
Das, Soma ;
Gastier-Foster, Julie ;
Grody, Wayne W. ;
Hegde, Madhuri ;
Lyon, Elaine ;
Spector, Elaine ;
Voelkerding, Karl ;
Rehm, Heidi L. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 17 (05) :405-424
[63]   Engagement with Genetic Information and Uptake of Genetic Testing: the Role of Trust and Personal Cancer History [J].
Roberts, Megan C. ;
Taber, Jennifer M. ;
Klein, William M. .
JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2018, 33 (04) :893-900
[64]   Twenty years of lesson learning: how does the RET genetic screening test impact the clinical management of medullary thyroid cancer? [J].
Romei, Cristina ;
Tacito, Alessia ;
Molinaro, Eleonora ;
Agate, Laura ;
Bottici, Valeria ;
Viola, David ;
Matrone, Antonio ;
Biagini, Agnese ;
Casella, Francesca ;
Ciampi, Raffaele ;
Materazzi, Gabriele ;
Miccoli, Paolo ;
Torregrossa, Liborio ;
Ugolini, Clara ;
Basolo, Fulvio ;
Vitti, Paolo ;
Elisei, Rossella .
CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 82 (06) :892-899
[65]   Routine germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing in patients with ovarian carcinoma: analysis of the Scottish real-life experience [J].
Rust, K. ;
Spiliopoulou, P. ;
Tang, C. Y. ;
Bell, C. ;
Stirling, D. ;
Phang, T. H. F. ;
Davidson, R. ;
Mackean, M. ;
Nussey, F. ;
Glasspool, R. M. ;
Reed, N. S. ;
Sadozye, A. ;
Porteous, M. ;
McGoldrick, T. ;
Ferguson, M. ;
Miedzybrodzka, Z. ;
McNeish, I. A. ;
Gourley, C. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 (11) :1451-1458
[66]   Comparison of Universal Genetic Testing vs Guideline-Directed Targeted Testing for Patients With Hereditary Cancer Syndrome [J].
Samadder, N. Jewel ;
Riegert-Johnson, Douglas ;
Boardman, Lisa ;
Rhodes, Deborah ;
Wick, Myra ;
Okuno, Scott ;
Kunze, Katie L. ;
Golafshar, Michael ;
Uson, Pedro L. S., Jr. ;
Mountjoy, Luke ;
Ertz-Archambault, Natalie ;
Patel, Neej ;
Rodriguez, Eduardo A. ;
Lizaola-Mayo, Blanca ;
Lehrer, Michael ;
Thorpe, Cameron S. ;
Yu, Nathan Y. ;
Esplin, Edward D. ;
Nussbaum, Robert L. ;
Sharp, Richard R. ;
Azevedo, Cindy ;
Klint, Margaret ;
Hager, Megan ;
Macklin-Mantia, Sarah ;
Bryce, Alan H. ;
Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S. ;
Sekulic, Aleksandar ;
Stewart, Keith A. .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2021, 7 (02) :230-237
[67]   Development of cancer genetic services in the UK: A national consultation [J].
Slade, Ingrid ;
Riddell, Daniel ;
Turnbull, Clare ;
Hanson, Helen ;
Rahman, Nazneen .
GENOME MEDICINE, 2015, 7
[68]   Genetic evaluation and testing for hereditary forms of cancer in the era of next-generation sequencing [J].
Stanislaw, Christine ;
Xue, Yuan ;
Wilcox, William R. .
CANCER BIOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2016, 13 (01) :55-67
[69]   The emerging landscape of breast cancer susceptibility [J].
Stratton, Michael R. ;
Rahman, Nazneen .
NATURE GENETICS, 2008, 40 (01) :17-22
[70]   Consensus for genes to be included on cancer panel tests offered by UK genetics services: guidelines of the UK Cancer Genetics Group [J].
Taylor, Amy ;
Brady, Angela F. ;
Frayling, Ian M. ;
Hanson, Helen ;
Tischkowitz, Marc ;
Turnbull, Clare ;
Side, Lucy .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2018, 55 (06) :372-377