Plant diversity partitioning in Mediterranean croplands: effects of farming intensity, field edge, and landscape context

被引:44
作者
Concepcion, Elena D. [1 ]
Fernandez-Gonzalez, Federico [2 ]
Diaz, Mario [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, Museo Nacl Ciencias Nat, E-28006 Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Fac Ciencias Ambientales & Bioquim, Dept Ciencias Ambientales, E-45071 Toledo, Spain
关键词
agri-environment schemes; alpha diversity; beta diversity; edge effects; gamma diversity; landscape composition; landscape connectivity; regional effects; AGRI-ENVIRONMENT SCHEMES; LAND-USE INTENSITY; AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION; SPECIES-DIVERSITY; FARMLAND BIODIVERSITY; SPATIAL SCALES; BETA-DIVERSITY; ARABLE WEEDS; MANAGEMENT; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1890/11-1471.1
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Farmland biodiversity is affected by factors acting at various spatial scales. However, most studies to date have focused on the field or farm scales that only account for local (alpha) diversity, and these may underestimate the contribution of other diversity components (beta diversity) to total (gamma) farmland diversity. In this work, we aimed to identify the most suitable management options and the scale at which they should be implemented to maximize benefits for diversity. We used a multi-scale additive partitioning approach, with data on plant diversity from 640 plots in 32 cereal crop fields from three agricultural regions of central Spain that differed in landscape configuration. We analyzed the relative contribution to overall plant diversity of different diversity components at various spatial scales and how these diversity components responded to a set of local (application of agri-environment schemes [AES] and position within the field) and landscape (field size and landscape connectivity and composition) factors. Differences in species composition among regions and then among fields within regions contributed most to overall plant diversity. Positive edge effects were found on all diversity components at both the field-and regional scales, whereas application of AES benefited all diversity components only at the field scale. Landscape factors had strong influences on plant diversity, especially length of seminatural boundaries, which increased species richness at both the field and the regional scales. In addition, positive effects of percentage of nonproductive land-uses in the landscape were found on all diversity components at the regional scale. Results showed that components that contributed most to overall plant diversity were not benefited by current AES. We conclude that agri-environmental policies should incorporate and prioritize measures aimed at the maintenance of seminatural boundaries and patches of nonproductive habitats within agricultural landscapes, through landscape planning, cross-compliance, or high nature-value farmland programs. These options will help to conserve overall plant diversity at regional scales, as well as the spillover of plant species from such seminatural elements into crops, especially in Mediterranean areas that still harbor extensive farming and relatively complex landscapes.
引用
收藏
页码:972 / 981
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] COMPONENTS OF DIVERSITY
    ALLAN, JD
    [J]. OECOLOGIA, 1975, 18 (04) : 359 - 367
  • [2] Ecological cross compliance promotes farmland biodiversity in Switzerland
    Aviron, Stephanie
    Nitsch, Heike
    Jeanneret, Philippe
    Buholzer, Serge
    Luka, Henryk
    Pfiffner, Lukas
    Pozzi, Stefano
    Schuepbach, Beatrice
    Walter, Thomas
    Herzog, Felix
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 7 (05) : 247 - 252
  • [3] Effects of farming management and landscape heterogeneity on plant species composition of Mediterranean field boundaries
    Bassa, Montserrat
    Boutin, Celine
    Chamorro, Lourdes
    Sans, F. Xavier
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 141 (3-4) : 455 - 460
  • [4] Landscape-moderated biodiversity effects of agri-environmental management: a meta-analysis
    Batary, Peter
    Baldi, Andras
    Kleijn, David
    Tscharntke, Teja
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 278 (1713) : 1894 - 1902
  • [5] Bates D., 2009, Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
  • [6] Benayas JMR, 2002, J VEG SCI, V13, P245, DOI 10.1658/1100-9233(2002)013[0245:PDBAEI]2.0.CO
  • [7] 2
  • [8] Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key?
    Benton, TG
    Vickery, JA
    Wilson, JD
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2003, 18 (04) : 182 - 188
  • [9] Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan-European study
    Billeter, R.
    Liira, J.
    Bailey, D.
    Bugter, R.
    Arens, P.
    Augenstein, I.
    Aviron, S.
    Baudry, J.
    Bukacek, R.
    Burel, F.
    Cerny, M.
    De Blust, G.
    De Cock, R.
    Diekotter, T.
    Dietz, H.
    Dirksen, J.
    Dormann, C.
    Durka, W.
    Frenzel, M.
    Hamersky, R.
    Hendrickx, F.
    Herzog, F.
    Klotz, S.
    Koolstra, B.
    Lausch, A.
    Le Coeur, D.
    Maelfait, J. P.
    Opdam, P.
    Roubalova, M.
    Schermann, A.
    Schermann, N.
    Schmidt, T.
    Schweiger, O.
    Smulders, M. J. M.
    Speelmans, M.
    Simova, P.
    Verboom, J.
    van Wingerden, W. K. R. E.
    Zobel, M.
    Edwards, P. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2008, 45 (01) : 141 - 150
  • [10] Castroviejo S., 1986, Flora iberica 1-8, 10-15, 17-18, 21