Organized or individual breast cancer screening: what motivates women?

被引:17
作者
Kalecinski, Julie [1 ]
Regnier-Denois, Veronique [1 ]
Ouedraogo, Samiratou [2 ,3 ]
Dabakuyo-Yonli, Tienhan Sandrine [3 ,4 ]
Dumas, Agnes [5 ]
Arveux, Patrick [2 ,3 ]
Chauvin, Franck [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] INSERM, CIC 1408, Ctr Hygee, Inst Cancerol Lucien Neuwirth, St Priest En Jarez, France
[2] Ctr Reg Lutte Canc Georges Francois Leclerc, Registre Canc Sein & Autres Canc Gynecol Cote Or, F-21000 Dijon, France
[3] Univ Bourgogne, Fac Med & Pharm Dijon, EA 4184, F-21000 Dijon, France
[4] Ctr Reg Lutte Canc Georges Francois Leclerc, Unite Biostat & Qualite Vie, F-21000 Dijon, France
[5] Inst Cancerol Gustave Roussy, Paris, France
[6] Fac Med Jacques Lisfranc, St Etienne, France
[7] Univ Lyon Claude Bernard, EMR 37 38 2, Lyon, France
来源
SANTE PUBLIQUE | 2015年 / 27卷 / 02期
关键词
Breast cancer; Mass screening; Organized mammography screening; Opportunistic mammography screening; Socioeconomic factors; Motivation; ECOLOGICAL DEPRIVATION INDEX; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PROGRAMS; PARTICIPATION; FRANCE;
D O I
10.3917/spub.152.0213
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: The breast cancer screening programme, proposed to all women between 50 and 69 years, consisting of two-view mammography screening every two years, has been generalized in France since 2004. The programme coexists with opportunistic mammography screening, provided outside official frameworks. This qualitative study was designed to identify the pros and cons of these two screening modes. Methods: Three hundred and forty-five women were randomly selected from women who had participated in a previous quantitative study and who were invited to attend for breast cancer screening in 13 French departments between 2010 and 2011. These women were asked to participate in a face-to-face semistructured interview conducted by a sociologist. Results: 48 women (17 from deprived areas) were interviewed. All chose to be screened for breast cancer either because they feared cancer, or because they wanted to control their own health. Twenty-seven women chose the organized screening programme, which they considered to be trustworthy, as negative mammograms are double checked by a second radiologist. Twenty-one women preferred individual screening, which they considered to be more reliable, less anonymous and providing them with more liberty to take control of their own health. Conclusion: Gynaecologists play an important role in women's decision to undergo individual breast cancer screening. They also have an important role to play in the promotion of organized breast cancer screening programme with this public.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 220
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Building a model to determine the cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in France
    Arveux, P
    Wait, S
    Schaffer, P
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2003, 12 (02) : 143 - 153
  • [2] Bernier M., 2004, RAPPORT RESULTATS DE, P52
  • [3] Bertolotto F, 2003, B EPIDEMIOL HEBD, P4
  • [4] Performance of systematic and non-systematic ('opportunistic') screening mammography: a comparative study from Denmark
    Bihrmann, Kristine
    Jensen, Allan
    Olsen, Anne Helene
    Nijor, Sisse
    Schwartz, Walter
    Veiborg, Ilse
    Lynge, Elsebeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2008, 15 (01) : 23 - 26
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic versus organised mammography screening in Switzerland
    de Gelder, Rianne
    Bulliard, Jean-Luc
    de Wolf, Chris
    Fracheboud, Jacques
    Draisma, Gerrit
    Schopper, Doris
    de Koning, Harry J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (01) : 127 - 138
  • [6] 25th Congress of the SFPO "Cancers, cultures and practices of care". Paris on 28 November 2008-Brakes and motivations in the screening of breast cancer: what typological profiles? Results from the EDIFICE survey
    Dolbeault, S.
    Blay, J. Y.
    Eisinger, F.
    Pivot, X.
    Morere, J. F.
    Calazel-Benque, A.
    Cals, L.
    Coscas, Y.
    Namer, M.
    Rixe, O.
    Roussel, C.
    Serin, D.
    Viguier, J.
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGIE, 2009, 3 (01) : 60 - 62
  • [7] Cancers detected at over-reading: analysis of data from the Loire-Atlantic breast cancer screening program, 2003-2005 (update)
    Doutriaux-Dumoulin, I.
    Allioux, A.
    Campion, L.
    Meingan, P.
    Molina, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2007, 88 (12): : 1873 - 1880
  • [8] DUPORT N, 2007, FACTEURS ADHESION DE
  • [9] Espie M, 2012, EMC Gynecol, V7, P1
  • [10] Mammographic screening programmes in Europe: organization, coverage and participation
    Giordano, Livia
    von Karsa, Lawrence
    Tomatis, Mariano
    Majek, Ondrej
    de Wolf, Chris
    Lancucki, Lesz
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Nystrom, Lennarth
    Segnan, Nereo
    Ponti, Antonio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2012, 19 : 72 - 82