Surgical therapy for intermediate risk prostate cancer

被引:1
作者
Schade, George R. [1 ]
Wood, David P., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Div Urol Oncol, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Prostate Cancer; Prostatectomy; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY; MARGIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.03.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Optimal surgical management of intermediate risk prostate cancer has yet to be defined. This is in part due to the heterogeneity of the disease burden in this patient population. When choosing the surgical approach for intermediate risk prostate cancer, urologists should attempt to maximize oncologic outcomes while balancing quality of life concerns. Due to significant risk of failure following solo treatment, multi-modality therapy should be available for those patients with poor pathologic outcomes following surgical therapy. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 836
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy Differs by Disease Risk Group [J].
Alkhateeb, Sultan ;
Alibhai, Shabbir ;
Fleshner, Neil ;
Finelli, Antonio ;
Jewett, Michael ;
Zlotta, Alexandre ;
Nesbitt, Michael ;
Lockwood, Gina ;
Trachtenberg, John .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (01) :145-150
[2]   Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression [J].
Aydin, H ;
Tsuzuki, T ;
Hernandez, D ;
Walsh, PC ;
Partin, AW ;
Epstein, JI .
UROLOGY, 2004, 64 (03) :551-555
[3]   Radical prostatectomy: Long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function ("trifecta") [J].
Bianco, FJ ;
Scardino, PT ;
Eastham, JA .
UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (5A) :83-94
[4]   Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy [J].
Blute, ML ;
Bostwick, DG ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Slezak, JM ;
Martin, SK ;
Amling, CL ;
Zincke, H .
UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (05) :733-739
[5]   Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: The American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer update panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes [J].
Cookson, Michael S. ;
Aus, Gunnar ;
Burnett, Arthur L. ;
Canby-Hagino, Edith D. ;
D'Amico, Anthony V. ;
Dmochowski, Roger R. ;
Eton, David T. ;
Forman, Jeffrey D. ;
Goldenberg, S. Larry ;
Hernandez, Javier ;
Higano, Celestia S. ;
Kraus, Stephen R. ;
Moul, Judd W. ;
Tangen, Catherine ;
Thrasher, J. Brantley ;
Thompson, Ian .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (02) :540-545
[6]   Predicting prostate specific antigen outcome preoperatively in the prostate specific antigen era [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Weinstein, M ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Schultz, D ;
Rhude, M ;
Rocha, S ;
Wein, A ;
Richie, JP .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (06) :2185-2188
[7]   Should a positive surgical margin following radical prostatectomy be pathological stage T2 or T3? Results from the search database [J].
Freedland, SJ ;
Aronson, WJ ;
Presti, JC ;
Kane, CJ ;
Terris, MK ;
Elashoff, D ;
Amling, CL .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (06) :2142-2146
[8]   Risk of colorectal cancer in men on long-term androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer [J].
Gillessen, Silke ;
Templeton, Arnoud ;
Marra, Giancarlo ;
Kuo, Yong-Fang ;
Valtorta, Emanuele ;
Shahinian, Vahakn B. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2010, 102 (23) :1760-1770
[9]   Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients [J].
Laurila, Timo A. J. ;
Huang, Wei ;
Jarrard, David F. .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2009, 27 (05) :529-533
[10]   The template of the primary lymphatic landing sites of the prostate should be revisited: results of a multimodality mapping study [J].
Mattei, Agostino ;
Fuechsel, Frank G. ;
Dhar, Niuedita Bhatta ;
Warncke, Sebastian H. ;
Thalmann, George N. ;
Krause, Thomas ;
Studer, Urs E. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 53 (01) :118-125