Spent fuel simulation during dry storage via enhancement of FRAPCON-4.0: Comparison between PWR and SMR and discharge burnup effect

被引:7
作者
Lee, Youho [1 ]
Woo, Dahyeon [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Nucl Eng, 1 Gwanak ro, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Spent fuel; Dry storage; SMR; NuScale; Hydride; Fuel Simulation; FRAPCON;
D O I
10.1016/j.net.2022.08.003
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Spent fuel behavior of dry storage was simulated in a continuous state from steady-state operation by modifying FRAPCON-4.0 to incorporate spent fuel-specific fuel behavior models. Spent fuel behavior of a typical PWR was compared with that of NuScale Power Module (NPMTM). Current PWR discharge burnup (60 MWd/kgU) gives a sufficient margin to the hoop stress limit of 90 MPa. Most hydrogen precipitation occurs in the first 50 years of dry storage, thereby no extra phenomenological safety factor is identified for extended dry storage up to 100 years. Regulation for spent fuel management can be significantly alleviated for LWR-based SMRs. Hydride embrittlement safety criterion is irrelevant to NuScale spent fuels; they have sufficiently lower plenum pressure and hydrogen contents compared to those of PWRs. Cladding creep out during dry storage reduces the subchannel area with burnup. The most deformed cladding outer diameter after 100 years of dry storage is found to be 9.64 mm for discharge burnup of 70 MWd/kgU. It may deteriorate heat transfer of dry storage by increasing flow resistance and decreasing the view factor of radiative heat transfer. Self-regulated by decreasing rod internal pressure with opening gap, cladding creep out closely reaches the saturated point after similar to 50 years of dry storage. (c) 2022 Korean Nuclear Society, Published by Elsevier Korea LLC. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:4499 / 4513
页数:15
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], Sabol
[2]  
ARIS, TECHN DAT
[3]  
Bang S., 2022, TEMPERATURE DEPENDEN
[4]  
Bouffioux P., 2020, INTERIM DRY STORAGE, P201, DOI [10.1115/ICEM2001-1035, DOI 10.1115/ICEM2001-1035]
[5]  
Feria F., 2015, WAY ENABLING FRAPCON
[6]  
Fort J.A., 2019, Thermal Modeling of the TN-32B Cask for the High Burnup Spent Fuel Data Project
[7]  
Geelhood K.J., 2015, FRAPCON 4 0 COMPUTER, V1
[8]  
Gilbert E., 2001, UPDATE CSFM METHODOL
[9]  
Hamalainen J., 2017, SAFIR2018 THE FINNIS, P387
[10]   CFD analysis of a cask for spent fuel dry storage: Model fundamentals and sensitivity studies [J].
Herranz, Luis E. ;
Penalva, Jaime ;
Feria, Francisco .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2015, 76 :54-62