Evaluation of machine learning methods for lithology classification using geophysical data

被引:171
作者
Bressan, Thiago Santi [1 ,2 ]
de Souza, Marcelo Kehl [1 ]
Girelli, Tiago J. [1 ]
Chemale Junior, Farid [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vale Rio do Sinos Unisinos, Sao Leopoldo, RS, Brazil
[2] Inst Fed Educ Ciencia & Tecnol Farroupilha IFFar, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
关键词
Lithological group; Pattern recognition; Multivariate data; Sedimentary rocks; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; SHALE LITHOFACIES; MARCELLUS SHALE; NEURAL-NETWORKS; ROC CURVE; IDENTIFICATION; FACIES; MODEL; BASIN; MAPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104475
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Specific computational tools assist geologists in identifying and sorting lithologies in well surveys and reducing operational costs and practical working time. This allows for the management of professional output, the efficient interpretation of data, and completion of scientific research on data collected in geologically distinct regions. Machine learning methods and applications integrate large sets of information with the goal of efficient pattern recognition and the capability of leveraging accurate decision making. The objective of this study is to apply machine learning methods to the supervised classification of lithologies using multivariate log parameter data from offshore wells from the International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP). According to the analysis of the lithologies proposed in the IODP Expeditions and for the application of our methods, the lithologies were divided into four groups. The IODP Expeditions were organized into four templates for better results in analyzing the set of expeditions and practical application of the methods. The templates were submitted to training, validation, and testing by multilayer perceptron (MLP), decision tree, random forest, and support vector machine (SVM) methods. The evaluation was randomly divided into training (70%), validation (10%), and testing (20%) using the classification methods as an evaluation of the results. In the results, it was observed that Template1 (IODP Expedition 362) obtained better results with the MLP method, Template2 (IODP Expeditions 354, 355, and 359) and Template3 (IODP Expeditions 354, 355, 359, and 362) obtained better results with the random forest method with greater than 80.00% accuracy. For cross-validation, the random forest method performed well in all scenarios. In the practical template, the G2 group obtained a better result with the MLP method with an average accuracy above 85.00%. It is expected that machine learning methods can help improve the study of geology with accurate and rapid answers related to interpreting collected data in different study regions.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   The spatial leave-pair-out cross-validation method for reliable AUC estimation of spatial classifiers [J].
Airola, Antti ;
Pohjankukka, Jonne ;
Torppa, Johanna ;
Middleton, Maarit ;
Nykanen, Vesa ;
Heikkonen, Jukka ;
Pahikkala, Tapio .
DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, 2019, 33 (03) :730-747
[2]   Application of Decision Tree Algorithm for classification and identification of natural minerals using SEM-EDS [J].
Akkas, Efe ;
Akin, Lutfiye ;
Cubukcu, H. Evren ;
Artuner, Harun .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2015, 80 :38-48
[3]  
Al-Mudhafar W.J., 2015, OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY, DOI [10.4043/25806-MS, DOI 10.4043/25806-MS]
[4]   Integrating well log interpretations for lithofacies classification and permeability modeling through advanced machine learning algorithms [J].
Al-Mudhafar W.J. .
Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2017, 7 (04) :1023-1033
[5]   Integrating kernel support vector machines for efficient rock facies classification in the main pay of Zubair formation in South Rumaila oil field, Iraq [J].
J. Al-Mudhafar W. .
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2017, 3 (1)
[6]   Modeling and Testing Landslide Hazard Using Decision Tree [J].
Alkhasawneh, Mutasem Sh. ;
Ngah, Umi Kalthum ;
Tay, Lea Tien ;
Isa, Nor Ashidi Mat ;
Al-Batah, Mohammad Subhi .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2014,
[7]  
[Anonymous], CHARACTERIZATION QUA
[8]  
[Anonymous], SYSTEM DESIGN LARGE
[9]  
[Anonymous], CASPIAN J INTERN MED
[10]  
[Anonymous], TRAINING TEST SETS A