EFORT recommendations for off-label use, mix & match and mismatch in hip and knee arthroplasty

被引:16
作者
Tucker, Keith [1 ]
Guenther, Klaus-Peter [2 ]
Kjaersgaard-Andersen, Per [3 ]
Luetzner, Joerg [2 ]
Kretzer, Jan Philippe [4 ]
Nelissen, Rob G. H. H. [5 ]
Lange, Toni [6 ,7 ]
Zagra, Luigi [8 ]
机构
[1] Orthopaed Data Evaluat Panel ODEP, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Hosp Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Univ Ctr Orthoped Trauma & Plast Surg, Fetscherstr 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[3] South Danish Univ, Vejle Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Vejle, Denmark
[4] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Lab Biomech & Implant Res, Clin Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed, Leiden, Netherlands
[6] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Hosp Carl Gustav Carus, Ctr Evidence Based Healthcare, Dresden, Germany
[7] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Med Carl Gustav, Dresden, Germany
[8] IRCCS Ist Ortoped Galeazzi, Hip Dept, Milan, Italy
关键词
hip arthroplasty; knee arthroplasty; mismatch; mix & match; off-label; COMPONENT SIZE MISMATCH; ON-CERAMIC BEARINGS; FIXED METAL SHELL; HEAD-NECK ADAPTER; DIFFERENT MANUFACTURERS; TAPER JUNCTION; FOLLOW-UP; ACETABULAR REVISION; CONSTRAINED LINERS; WEAR;
D O I
10.1302/2058-5241.6.210080
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Off-label use is frequently practiced in primary and revision arthroplasty, as there may be indications for the application of implants for purposes outside the one the manufacturers intended. Under certain circumstances, patients may benefit from selective application of mix & match. This can refer to primary hip arthroplasty (if evidence suggests that the combination of devices from different manufacturers has superior results) and revision hip or knee arthroplasty (when the exchange of one component only is necessary and the invasiveness of surgery can be reduced). Within the EFORT 'Implant and Patient Safety Initiative', evidence-and consensus-based recommendations have been developed for the safe application of off-label use and mix & match in primary as well as revision hip and knee arthroplasty. Prior to the application of a medical device for hip or knee arthroplasty off-label and within a mix & match situation, surgeons should balance the risks and benefits to the patient, obtain informed consent, and document the decision process appropriately. Nevertheless, it is crucial for surgeons to only combine implants that are compatible. Mismatch of components, where their sizes or connections do not fit, may have catastrophic effects and is a surgical mistake. Surgeons must be fully aware of the features of the components that they use in off-label indications or during mix & match applications, must be appropriately trained and must audit their results. Considering the frequent practice of off-label and mix & match as well as the potential medico-legal issues, further research is necessary to obtain more data about the appropriate indications and outcomes for those procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:982 / 1005
页数:24
相关论文
共 117 条
  • [1] Revision of a Monoblock Metal-on-Metal Cup Using a Dual Mobility Component: Is It a Reasonable Option?
    Affatato, Saverio
    Castiello, Emanuela
    Amendola, Luca
    Comitini, Saverio
    Prudhon, Jean Louis
    Tigani, Domenico
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (09)
  • [2] Anand Rajan, 2011, J Bone Joint Surg Am, V93 Suppl 3, P51, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.K.00867
  • [3] Bariatric surgery prior to total knee arthroplasty is not associated with lower risk of revision: a register-based study of 441 patients
    Arani, Perna Ighani
    Wretenberg, Per
    Ottosson, Johan
    Robertsson, Otto
    W-Dahl, Annette
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2021, 92 (01) : 97 - 101
  • [4] A large taper mismatch is one of the key factors behind high wear rates and failure at the taper junction of total hip replacements: A finite element wear analysis
    Ashkanfar, Ariyan
    Langton, David J.
    Joyce, Thomas J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2017, 69 : 257 - 266
  • [5] Can We Avoid Implant-selection Errors in Total Joint Arthroplasty?
    Ast, Michael P.
    Mayman, David J.
    Bostrom, Mathias P.
    Della Valle, Alejandro Gonzalez
    Haas, Steven B.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 477 (01) : 130 - 133
  • [6] COMPLICATIONS RELATED TO MODULARITY OF TOTAL HIP COMPONENTS
    BARRACK, RL
    BURKE, DW
    COOK, SD
    SKINNER, HB
    HARRIS, WH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1993, 75 (05): : 688 - 692
  • [7] Host-related factors for venous thromboembolism following total joint replacement: A meta-analysis of 89 observational studies involving over 14 million hip and knee replacements
    Barrett, Matthew C.
    Whitehouse, Michael R.
    Blom, Ashley W.
    Kunutsor, Setor K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2020, 25 (02) : 267 - 275
  • [8] Intermediate to Long-Term Follow-up of Cementing Liners into Well-Fixed Acetabular Components
    Bedard, Nicholas A.
    Tetreault, Matthew W.
    Hanssen, Arlen D.
    Lewallen, David G.
    Trousdale, Robert T.
    Berry, Daniel J.
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2020, 102 (16) : 1397 - 1404
  • [9] Mechanical stability of polyethylene liners cemented into acetabular shells
    Bensen, CV
    Del Schutte, H
    Weaver, KD
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2000, 28 (1-2) : 7 - 10
  • [10] Ethical standards for orthopaedic surgeons
    Benson, M.
    Boehler, N.
    Szendroi, M.
    Zagra, L.
    Puget, J.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2014, 96B (08) : 1130 - 1132