A randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of functional knee brace and neoprene sleeve use after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

被引:66
作者
Birmingham, Trevor B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bryant, Dianne M. [2 ,3 ]
Giffin, J. Robert [2 ,3 ]
Litchfield, Robert B. [2 ,3 ]
Kramer, John F. [3 ]
Donner, Allan [3 ]
Fowler, Peter J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Phys Therapy, London, ON N6G 1H1, Canada
[2] Fowler Kennedy Sport Med Clin, London, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction; functional knee brace; neoprene sleeve; randomized clinical trial (RCT);
D O I
10.1177/0363546507311601
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Despite a lack of evidence for their effectiveness, functional knee braces are commonly prescribed to patients after anterior cruciate ligament ( ACL) reconstruction. Purpose: This trial was conducted to compare postoperative outcomes in patients using an ACL functional knee brace and patients using a neoprene knee sleeve. Hypothesis: Patients using a brace will have superior outcomes than those using a sleeve. Study Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: One hundred fifty patients were randomized to receive a brace (n = 76) or neoprene sleeve ( n = 74) at their 6-week postoperative visit after primary ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Patients were assessed preoperatively, then 6 weeks and 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Outcome measures included disease-specific quality of life (Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Quality of Life [ACL-QOL] Questionnaire), anterior tibial translation (KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference), the single-limb forward hop test ( limb symmetry index), and Tegner Activity Scale. Outcomes at 1 and 2 years were compared after adjusting for baseline scores. Subjective ratings of how patients felt while using the brace/sleeve were also collected for descriptive purposes using a questionnaire. Four a priori directional subgroup hypotheses were evaluated using tests for interactions. Results: There were no significant differences between brace (n = 62) and sleeve ( n = 65) groups for any of the outcomes at 1-and 2-year follow-ups. Adjusted mean differences at 2 years were as follows: -0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], -7.52 to 5.64) for the ACL-QOL Questionnaire, -0.10 mm ( 95% CI, -0.99 to 0.81) for KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference, -0.87% ( 95% CI, -8.89 to 7.12) for hop limb symmetry index, and -0.05 ( 95% CI, -0.72 to 0.62) for the Tegner Activity Scale. Subjective ratings of confidence in the knee provided by the brace/ sleeve were higher for the brace group than the sleeve group. Subgroup findings were minimal. Adverse events were few and similar between groups. Conclusions: A functional knee brace does not result in superior outcomes compared with a neoprene sleeve after ACL reconstruction. Current evidence does not support the recommendation of using an ACL functional knee brace after ACL reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:648 / 655
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]   Knee bracing after ACL reconstruction: effects on postural control and proprioception [J].
Birmingham, TB ;
Kramer, JF ;
Kirkley, A ;
Inglis, JT ;
Spaulding, SJ ;
Vandervoort, AA .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2001, 33 (08) :1253-1258
[12]   Is a knee brace advantageous after anterior cruciate ligament surgery?: A prospective, randomised study with a two-year follow-up [J].
Brandsson, S ;
Faxén, E ;
Kartus, J ;
Eriksson, BI ;
Karlsson, J .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2001, 11 (02) :110-114
[13]   Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity scale for patients with meniscal injury of the knee [J].
Briggs, KK ;
Kocher, MS ;
Rodkey, WG ;
Steadman, JR .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (04) :698-705
[14]   Patients undergoing knee surgery provided accurate ratings of preoperative quality of life and function 2 weeks after surgery [J].
Bryant, Dianne ;
Norman, Geoff ;
Stratford, Paul ;
Marx, Robert G. ;
Walter, S. D. ;
Guyatt, Gordon .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (09) :984-993
[15]  
Decoster LC, 2003, ORTHOPEDICS, V26, P701
[16]   The influence of functional knee bracing on the anterior cruciate ligament strain biomechanics in weightbearing and nonweightbearing knees [J].
Fleming, BC ;
Renstrom, PA ;
Beynnon, BD ;
Engstrom, B ;
Peura, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (06) :815-824
[17]   Post-operative use of knee brace in bone-tendon-bone patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 5-year follow-up results of a randomized prospective study [J].
Harilainen, A ;
Sandelin, J .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2006, 16 (01) :14-18
[18]   Knee brace after bone-tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Randomized, prospective study with 2-year follow-up [J].
Harilainen A. ;
Sandelin J. ;
Vanhanen I. ;
Kivinen A. .
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 1997, 5 (1) :10-13
[19]   Beliefs and attitudes of members of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons regarding the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury [J].
Marx, RG ;
Jones, EC ;
Angel, M ;
Wickiewicz, TL ;
Warren, RF .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2003, 19 (07) :762-770
[20]   Functional bracing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - A prospective, randomized, multicenter study [J].
McDevitt, ER ;
Taylor, DC ;
Miller, MD ;
Gerber, JP ;
Ziemke, G ;
Hinkin, D ;
Uhorchak, JM ;
Arciero, RA ;
Pierre, PS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (08) :1887-1892