Acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: does catheter-directed thrombolysis affect outcomes?

被引:2
|
作者
Abd El-Mabooda, El-Sayed A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sorour, Waleed A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Benha Univ, Dept Gen, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Benha Univ, Dept Vasc Surg, Cairo, Egypt
[3] Benha Insurance Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Banha, Egypt
[4] Zagazig Univ, Dept Vasc Surg, Zagazig, Egypt
来源
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 2020年 / 39卷 / 02期
关键词
catheter-directed thrombolysis; iliofemoral venous thrombosis; post-thrombotic syndrome; standard anticoagulation; VENOUS THROMBOSIS; POSTTHROMBOTIC SYNDROME; LOWER-EXTREMITY; ANTICOAGULATION; TRIAL; RISK; ALTEPLASE; REMOVAL; THERAPY; CAVENT;
D O I
10.4103/ejs.ejs_209_19
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The aim was to assess the role of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in improving patency of the treated venous segments and to examine the correlation of residual thrombus with post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Background Iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is associated with severe post-thrombotic morbidity when treated with anticoagulation alone. CDT allows early removal of thrombus and reduce valvular reflux and PTS. Patients and methods This prospective randomized controlled two-arm study was conducted on 42 patients with iliofemoral DVT. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups according to the intervention performed. Group A: CDT followed by oral anticoagulants [N=21 (50%)], group B: standard DVT therapy [N=21 (50%)]. The follow-up period was 24 months. Results Patients of group A complained of less pain at 10 and 30 days (P=0.02 and 0.04, respectively). Also, there was significant decrease in leg circumference in group A at 10 and 30 days (P=0.001 and 0.03, respectively). A total of three (15%) clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding complications were reported in the CDT group. Using CDT is associated with less PTS at sixth month, 1 year, and 2 years; six (27.3%), seven (31.8%), and nine (40.9%), respectively, as compared with group B; 11 (47.8%), 13 (56.5%), and 15 (65.2%), respectively (P=0.024, 0.017, and 0.035, respectively). Conclusion Addition of CDT in the treatment of acute iliofemoral DVT was safe and tolerated by most of the patients with better effect to reduce leg pain and circumference. It was considered a protecting weapon to prevent PTS and thereby improving the quality of life and was related to achievement of higher iliac vein patency and less reflux.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 337
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The feasibility of catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute deep vein thrombosis: a regional perspective
    Gauci, B. N.
    Powell, J. T.
    Hunt, B. J.
    Pilcher, J.
    Morgan, R.
    Thompson, M. M.
    Holt, P. J. E.
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2011, 26 (03) : 94 - 101
  • [32] Ultrasound-accelerated vs Standard Catheter-directed Thrombolysis-A Comparative Study in Patients with Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis
    Baker, Reginald
    Samuels, Shaun
    Benenati, James F.
    Powell, Alex
    Uthoff, Heiko
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 23 (11) : 1460 - 1466
  • [33] The background and role of catheter-directed thrombolysis evolving procedures for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis
    Biekgaard, Niels
    van Rijn, Marie Josee E.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 65 (01): : 12 - 22
  • [34] Postthrombotic morbidity correlates with residual thrombus following catheter-directed thrombolysis for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis
    Comerota, Anthony J.
    Grewal, Nina
    Martinez, Jorge Trabal
    Chen, John Tahao
    DiSalle, Robert
    Andrews, Linda
    Sepanski, Deb
    Assi, Zakaria
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 55 (03) : 768 - 773
  • [35] Quality of life after catheter-directed thrombolysis and standard anticoagulation for iliofemoral deep-vein thrombosis
    Sebastian, Jithin Jagan
    Ayyappan, M. K.
    Pawar, Pranay
    Mathur, Kapil
    Raju, Radhakrishnan
    Rajendra, Naveen
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 6 (04) : 274 - 277
  • [36] Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Deep-Vein Thrombosis
    Vedantham, S.
    Goldhaber, S. Z.
    Julian, J. A.
    Kahn, S. R.
    Jaff, M. R.
    Cohen, D. J.
    Magnuson, E.
    Razavi, M. K.
    Comerota, A. J.
    Gornik, H. L.
    Murphy, T. P.
    Lewis, L.
    Duncan, J. R.
    Nieters, P.
    Derfler, M. C.
    Filion, M.
    Gu, C. -S.
    Kee, S.
    Schneider, J.
    Saad, N.
    Blinder, M.
    Moll, S.
    Sacks, D.
    Lin, J.
    Rundback, J.
    Garcia, M.
    Razdan, R.
    VanderWoude, E.
    Marques, V.
    Kearon, C.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (23): : 2240 - 2252
  • [37] Inflow thrombosis does not adversely affect thrombolysis outcomes of symptomatic iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis
    Jeyabalan, Geetha
    Marone, Luke
    Rhee, Robert
    Hirsch, Stanley
    Makaroun, Michel S.
    Cho, JaeSung
    Chaer, Rabih A.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 54 (02) : 448 - 453
  • [38] Pregnancy outcomes in 16 women with previous catheter-directed thrombolysis and stenting for acute left iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis
    Zhou, Yadong
    Chen, Yingying
    Xue, Ming
    Zheng, Xuexun
    Guan, Yunbiao
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2023, 38 (07) : 445 - 450
  • [39] Indications for Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the Management of Acute Proximal Deep Venous Thrombosis
    Patterson, Benjamin O.
    Hinchliffe, Robert
    Loftus, Ian M.
    Thompson, Matt M.
    Holt, Peter J. E.
    ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY, 2010, 30 (04) : 669 - 674
  • [40] Role of Catheter-directed Thrombolysis in Management of Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis
    Chen, James X.
    Sudheendra, Deepak
    Stavropoulos, S. William
    Nadolski, Gregory J.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2016, 36 (05) : 1565 - 1575