Do we know the actual magnetopause position for typical solar wind conditions?

被引:34
作者
Samsonov, A. A. [1 ]
Gordeev, E. [1 ]
Tsyganenko, N. A. [1 ]
Safrankova, J. [2 ]
Nemecek, Z. [2 ]
Simunek, J. [3 ]
Sibeck, D. G. [4 ]
Toth, G. [5 ]
Merkin, V. G. [6 ]
Raeder, J. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] St Petersburg State Univ, St Petersburg, Russia
[2] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Math & Phys, Prague, Czech Republic
[3] CAS, Inst Atmospher Phys, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Climate & Space, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Univ, Appl Phys Lab, Laurel, MD USA
[7] Univ New Hampshire, Dept Phys, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[8] Univ New Hampshire, Ctr Space Sci, Durham, NH 03824 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 俄罗斯基础研究基金会;
关键词
magnetopause; MHD modeling; GLOBAL MHD; MAGNETIC-FIELD; DAYSIDE MAGNETOSPHERE; EARTHS MAGNETOPAUSE; GEOMAGNETIC FIELD; PRESSURE BALANCE; BOW SHOCK; MODEL; SHAPE; MAGNETOSHEATH;
D O I
10.1002/2016JA022471
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We compare predicted magnetopause positions at the subsolar point and four reference points in the terminator plane obtained from several empirical and numerical MHD models. Empirical models using various sets of magnetopause crossings and making different assumptions about the magnetopause shape predict significantly different magnetopause positions (with a scatter >1R(E)) even at the subsolar point. Axisymmetric magnetopause models cannot reproduce the cusp indentations or the changes related to the dipole tilt effect, and most of them predict the magnetopause closer to the Earth than nonaxisymmetric models for typical solar wind conditions and zero tilt angle. Predictions of two global nonaxisymmetric models do not match each other, and the models need additional verification. MHD models often predict the magnetopause closer to the Earth than the nonaxisymmetric empirical models, but the predictions of MHD simulations may need corrections for the ring current effect and decreases of the solar wind pressure that occur in the foreshock. Comparing MHD models in which the ring current magnetic field is taken into account with the empirical Lin et al. model, we find that the differences in the reference point positions predicted by these models are relatively small for B-z=0. Therefore, we assume that these predictions indicate the actual magnetopause position, but future investigations are still needed.
引用
收藏
页码:6493 / 6508
页数:16
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Reconstructing the magnetosphere from data using radial basis functions [J].
Andreeva, Varvara A. ;
Tsyganenko, Nikolai A. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2016, 121 (03) :2249-2263
[2]   THE INTERACTION OF THE TERRESTRIAL MAGNETIC FIELD WITH THE SOLAR CORPUSCULAR RADIATION [J].
BEARD, DB .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1960, 65 (11) :3559-3568
[3]   An empirical model of the high-latitude magnetopause [J].
Boardsen, SA ;
Eastman, TE ;
Sotirelis, T ;
Green, JL .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2000, 105 (A10) :23193-23219
[4]   THE EFFECT OF NONZERO-DEL.B ON THE NUMERICAL-SOLUTION OF THE MAGNETO-HYDRODYNAMIC EQUATIONS [J].
BRACKBILL, JU ;
BARNES, DC .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1980, 35 (03) :426-430
[5]  
Chapman S., 1931, J. Geophys. Res, V36, P77, DOI DOI 10.1029/TE036I002P00077
[6]   Coupling of a global MHD code and an inner magnetospheric model:: Initial results -: art. no. A12219 [J].
De Zeeuw, DL ;
Sazykin, S ;
Wolf, RA ;
Gombosi, TI ;
Ridley, AJ ;
Tóth, G .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2004, 109 (A12)
[7]   Three-dimensional artificial neural network model of the dayside magnetopause [J].
Dmitriev, AV ;
Suvorova, AV .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2000, 105 (A8) :18909-18918
[8]   INTERPLANETARY MAGNETIC FIELD AND AURORAL ZONES [J].
DUNGEY, JW .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1961, 6 (02) :47-&
[9]   The average shape of the magnetopause: A comparison of three-dimensional global MHD and empirical models [J].
Elsen, RK ;
Winglee, RM .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1997, 102 (A3) :4799-4819
[10]   AVERAGE AND UNUSUAL LOCATIONS OF EARTHS MAGNETOPAUSE AND BOW SHOCK [J].
FAIRFIELD, DH .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1971, 76 (28) :6700-+