Paths towards Family-friendly Working Time Arrangements: Comparing Workplaces in Different Countries and Industries

被引:24
作者
Wiss, Tobias [1 ]
机构
[1] Hertie Sch Governance, Berlin, Germany
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Family policy; Industrial relations; Working time; Work-life balance; TRADE-UNIONS; POLICIES; BRITAIN; FLEXIBILITY; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1111/spol.12270
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Although studies have examined the distribution and conditions of employer-provided work-family arrangements, we still lack a systematic investigation of how these vary for different countries and industries. Based on the European Working Conditions Survey 2010, this study examines the conditions under which firms provide family-friendly working time arrangements and what the differences are across four countries (Austria, Denmark, Italy and the UK) and four industries. The impact of employee representatives, employee involvement, manager support and female managers varies across countries and industries because of the institutional environment (prevailing family model, industrial relations) and workforce composition (gender). The impact of employee representatives depends on their co-determination rights, and the direction of their effect on the prevailing family model (e.g. negative in conservative countries such as Austria) and the gender composition of the workforce (negative in male-dominated production, but positive in services). Employee involvement in the work organization is significantly positive in Austria and Denmark (both with co-operative industrial relations), while manager support has the strongest effect in the UK (liberal regime). At the industry level, female supervisors are positively associated with family-friendly working time arrangements only in the male-dominated production industry. These findings suggest that the effects of agency variables and their direction vary depending on the institutional context.
引用
收藏
页码:1406 / 1430
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Amable Bruno., 2003, DIVERSITY MODERN CAP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Fifth European Working Conditions Survey
[3]  
[Anonymous], INT REV LEAVE POLICI
[4]   Contesting time: International comparisons of employee control of working time [J].
Berg, P ;
Appelbaum, E ;
Bailey, T ;
Kalleberg, AL .
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 2004, 57 (03) :331-349
[5]   WORK-LIFE FLEXIBILITY POLICIES: DO UNIONS AFFECT EMPLOYEE ACCESS AND USE? [J].
Berg, Peter ;
Kossek, Ellen Ernst ;
Misra, Kaumudi ;
Belman, Dale .
ILR REVIEW, 2014, 67 (01) :111-137
[6]  
Bloksgaard L., 2014, INT REV LEAVE POLICI
[7]   Classifying welfare states: A two-dimension approach [J].
Bonoli, G .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 1997, 26 :351-372
[8]  
Braun J., 2009, WISO, V32, P103
[9]   When do benevolent capitalists change their mind? Explaining the retrenchment of defined-benefit pensions in Britain [J].
Bridgen, P ;
Meyer, T .
SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2005, 39 (07) :764-785
[10]   Trade unions and family-friendly policies in Britain [J].
Budd, JW ;
Mumford, K .
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 2004, 57 (02) :204-222