The impact of chronic hepatitis B on quality of life: A multinational study of utilities from infected and uninfected persons

被引:121
作者
Levy, Adrian R.
Kowdley, Kris V.
Iloeje, Uchenna
Tafesse, Eskinder
Mukherjee, Jayanti
Gish, Robert
Bzowej, Natalie
Briggs, Andrew H.
机构
[1] Oxford Outcomes Ltd., Vancouver, BC
[2] University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
[3] Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA
[4] Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Wallingford, CT
[5] California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
[6] Glasgow University, Glasgow
[7] Oxford Outcomes Ltd., Vancouver, BC V6B 1P1
关键词
cost-effectiveness; cost-utility international variation; hepatitis B; quality of life; utilities;
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00297.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a condition that results in substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide because of progressive liver damage. Investigators undertaking economic evaluations of new therapeutic agents require estimates of health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Recently, evidence has begun to accumulate that differences in cultural backgrounds have a quantifiable impact on perceptions of health. The objective was to elicit utilities for six health states that occur after infection with the hepatitis B virus from infected and uninfected respondents living in jurisdictions with low and with high CHB endemicity. Methods: Standard gamble utilities were elicited from hepatitis patients and uninfected respondents using an interviewer-administered survey in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Spain, Hong Kong, and mainland China. Generalized linear models were used to the effect on utilities of current health, age and sex, jurisdiction and, for infected respondents, current disease state. Results: The sample included 534 CHB-infected patients and 600 uninfected respondents. CHB and compensated cirrhosis had a moderate impact on HRQOL with utilities ranging from 0.68 to 0.80. Decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma had a stronger impact with utilities ranging from 0.35 to 0.41. Significant variation was observed between countries, with both types of respondents in mainland China and Hong Kong reporting systematically lower utilities. Conclusions: Health states related to CHB infection have substantial reductions in HRQOL and the utilities reported in this study provide valuable information for comparing new treatment options. The observed intercountry differences suggest that economic evaluations may benefit from country-specific utility estimates. The extent that systematic intercountry differences in utilities hold true for other infectious and chronic diseases remains an open question and has considerable implications for the proper conduct and interpretation of economic evaluations.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 538
页数:12
相关论文
共 76 条
[11]   The direct cost of managing patients with chronic hepatitis B infection in Australia [J].
Butler, JRG ;
Pianko, S ;
Korda, RJ ;
Nguyen, S ;
Gow, PJ ;
Roberts, SK ;
Strasser, SI ;
Sievert, W .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 38 (10) :S187-S192
[12]  
CHEN CJ, 2005, TAIWAN J HEPATOL S2, V42, pS16
[13]  
Chen G, 2005, J HEPATOL, V42, P173
[14]  
Chong CAKY, 2003, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V98, P630, DOI [10.1016/S0002-9270(02)06054-9, 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07332.x]
[15]   Global epidemiology of hepatitis B virus [J].
Custer, B ;
Sullivan, SD ;
Hazlet, TK ;
Iloeje, U ;
Veenstra, DL ;
Kowdley, KV .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 38 (10) :S158-S168
[16]  
De Wit GA, 2000, HEALTH ECON, V9, P109, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(200003)9:2<109::AID-HEC503>3.0.CO
[17]  
2-L
[18]   The use of foot orthotic devices in clinical practice [J].
Dolan, MG .
ATHLETIC THERAPY TODAY, 2000, 5 (01) :17-21
[19]   Whose preferences count? [J].
Dolan, P .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1999, 19 (04) :482-486
[20]   A meta-analysis demonstrates no significant differences between patient and population preferences [J].
Dolders, Maria G. T. ;
Zeegers, Maurice P. A. ;
Groot, Wim ;
Ament, Andre .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (07) :653-664