Risk analysis in research environment - Part II: Weighting Lab Criticity Index using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

被引:24
作者
Ouedraogo, Aristide [1 ]
Groso, Amela [2 ]
Meyer, Thierry [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Grp Chem & Phys Safety, Inst Chem Sci & Engn, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Sch Basic Sci, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Analytic Hierarchy Process; Multicriteria decision making; Risk priority number; Criticity index; Risk analysis; Risk assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2010.12.011
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A new methodology for risk analysis. namely Laboratory Assessment and Risk Analysis - LARA, is proposed in the companion paper to assess risks in research/academia environment. The core of this methodology relies on defining the adequate role player factors to assess risks in research environment and their mathematical combination to quantify and assess the risk. Quantitative outcome of the analysis results in a Lab Criticity Index - LCI, constructed as a rather comprehensive function of probability, severity, risk worsening factors, research specificities and Hazard Detectability. Even though the LCI model can be used at this stage, its "surjective" and "linear" properties were outlined; the non differentiation between LCI factors remains to be solved. The present article addresses this problematic, bringing a solution based on a Multicriteria Decision Making - MCDM modeling, namely Analytic Hierarchy Process - AHP. This leads to a refined criticity index being "bijective" and unique for every combination of factors. A preliminary risk assessment based on the LARA methodology is discussed for a research lab working with lasers. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 793
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Ben-Daya M., 1996, International Journal of Quality Reliability Management, V1, P43, DOI DOI 10.1108/02656719610108297
  • [2] On teaching the analytic hierarchy process
    Bodin, L
    Gass, SI
    [J]. COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2003, 30 (10) : 1487 - 1497
  • [3] An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis
    Bowles, JB
    [J]. ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2003 PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 380 - 386
  • [4] BRABAND J, 2003, J SAFETY, V21, P23
  • [5] BRABAND J, 2006, SYSTEM SAFETY, P285
  • [6] AN INDIRECT COST THEORY OF WORK ACCIDENT PREVENTION
    BRODY, B
    LETOURNEAU, Y
    POIRIER, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENTS, 1990, 13 (04): : 255 - 270
  • [7] Multiple criteria decision-making techniques in higher education
    Ho, William
    Dey, Prasanta
    Higson, Helen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 20 (05) : 319 - +
  • [8] Risk analysis in research environment - Part I: Modeling Lab Criticity Index using Improved Risk Priority Number
    Ouedraogo, Aristide
    Groso, Amela
    Meyer, Thierry
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2011, 49 (06) : 778 - 784
  • [9] THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS - WHAT IT IS AND HOW IT IS USED
    SAATY, RW
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 1987, 9 (3-5): : 161 - 176
  • [10] Saaty TL, 2003, MATH COMPUT MODEL, V38, P233, DOI 10.1016/S0895-7177(03)00216-4