Mid-term Outcomes and Predictors of Transarterial Embolization for Type II Endoleak After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

被引:21
作者
Horinouchi, Hiroki [1 ]
Okada, Takuya [1 ]
Yamaguchi, Masato [1 ]
Maruyama, Koji [2 ]
Sasaki, Koji [1 ]
Gentsu, Tomoyuki [1 ]
Ueshima, Eisuke [1 ]
Sofue, Keitaro [1 ]
Kawasaki, Ryota [2 ]
Nomura, Yoshikatsu [3 ]
Omura, Atsushi [4 ]
Okada, Kenji [4 ]
Sugimoto, Koji [1 ]
Murakami, Takamichi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kobe Univ, Dept Radiol, Grad Sch Med, Chuo Ku, 7-5-2 Kusunoki Cho, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
[2] Hyogo Brain & Heart Ctr, Dept Radiol, Himeji, Hyogo, Japan
[3] Hyogo Brain & Heart Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Himeji, Hyogo, Japan
[4] Kobe Univ, Dept Surg, Div Cardiovasc Surg, Grad Sch Med, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
关键词
Type II endoleak; Embolization; Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Endovascular aortic repair; Predictor; Sac enlargement; FOLLOW-UP; INTERVENTION; EVAR;
D O I
10.1007/s00270-020-02436-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the mid-term outcomes of transarterial embolization (TAE) for type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) and investigate the predictors of sac enlargement after embolization. Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 55 patients [48 men and 7 women, median age 79.0 (interquartile ranges 74-82) years] who underwent TAE for type II endoleak from 2010 to 2018. The aneurysmal sac enlargement, endoleaks, aneurysm-related adverse event rate, and reintervention rate were evaluated. Patients' characteristics and clinical factors were evaluated for their association with sac enlargement. Results Fifty-five patients underwent TAE with technical success and were subsequently followed for a median of 636 (interquartile ranges 446-1292) days. The freedom from sac enlargement rates at 1, 3, and 5 years was 73.2%, 32.0%, and 26.7%, respectively. After initial TAE, the recurrent type II, delayed type I, and occult type III endoleak were identified in 39 (71%), 5 (9%), and 3 (5%) patients, respectively. Although a patient had aorto-duodenal fistula, there was no aneurysm-related death. The freedom from reintervention rates was 84.6%, 35.7%, and 17.0%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, sac diameter > 55 mm at initial TAE (hazard ratios, 3.23; 95% confidence intervals, 1.22-8.58; P < 0.05) was a significant predictor of sac enlargement. Conclusion TAE for type II endoleak was not effective in preventing sac enlargement, and reinterventions were required among the mid-term follow-up. The sac diameter > 55 mm at initial TAE was a significant predictor of sac enlargement.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 705
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Outcomes of percutaneous endovascular intervention for type II endoleak with aneurysm expansion [J].
Aziz, Abdulhameed ;
Menias, Christine O. ;
Sanchez, Luis A. ;
Picus, Daniel ;
Saad, Nael ;
Rubin, Brian G. ;
Curci, John A. ;
Geraghty, Patrick J. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 55 (05) :1263-1267
[2]   Multicenter Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing system experience in aneurysm sac sealing [J].
Boeckler, Dittmar ;
Holden, Andrew ;
Thompson, Matt ;
Hayes, Paul ;
Krievins, Dainis ;
de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M. ;
Reijnen, Michel M. P. J. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 62 (02) :290-298
[3]  
Choke E, 2004, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V45, P349
[4]   Type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm are not always a benign condition [J].
El Batti, Salma ;
Cochennec, Frederic ;
Roudot-Thoraval, Francoise ;
Becquemin, Jean-Pierre .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 57 (05) :1291-1297
[5]   Clinical significance of type II endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm [J].
Gelfand, DV ;
White, GH ;
Wilson, SE .
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 20 (01) :69-74
[6]   Type II Endoleak After Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Using the Endurant Stent Graft System for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Occluded Inferior Mesenteric Artery [J].
Gentsu, Tomoyuki ;
Okada, Takuya ;
Yamaguchi, Masato ;
Horinouchi, Hiroki ;
Katayama, Naoto ;
Ueshima, Eisuke ;
Koide, Yutaka ;
Sofue, Keitaro ;
Gotake, Yasuko ;
Nomura, Yoshikatsu ;
Tanaka, Hiroshi ;
Okita, Yutaka ;
Sugimoto, Koji ;
Murakami, Takamichi .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 42 (04) :505-512
[7]   Endovascular versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm [J].
Greenhalgh, Roger M. ;
Brown, Louise C. ;
Powell, Janet T. ;
Thompson, Simon G. ;
Epstein, David ;
Sculpher, Mark J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (20) :1863-1871
[8]   Is intervention better than surveillance in patients with type 2 endoleak post-endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair? [J].
Hajibandeh, Shahin ;
Ahmad, Naseer ;
Antoniou, George A. ;
Torella, Francesco .
INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 20 (01) :128-134
[9]   Outcomes of Endovascular Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms A Nationwide Survey in Japan [J].
Hoshina, Katsuyuki ;
Ishimaru, Shin ;
Sasabuchi, Yusuke ;
Yasunaga, Hideo ;
Komori, Kimihiro ;
Shigematsu, Kunihiro ;
Hirayama, Atsushi ;
Toma, Masanao ;
Kichikawa, Kimi-Hiko ;
Sato, Osamu ;
Sadogawa, Hiroyuki ;
Koyama, Nobuya ;
Nishimura, Takashi ;
Shimizu, Hideyuki ;
Furui, Shigeru ;
Ishimaru, Shin ;
Kato, Masaaki .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 269 (03) :564-573
[10]   Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection (JCS 2011) - Digest Version [J].
Ishimaru, Shin ;
Kato, Masaaki ;
Kuribayashi, Sachio ;
Matsuo, Hiroshi ;
Miyata, Tetsuro ;
Nakajima, Yutaka ;
Ogino, Hitoshi ;
Ohki, Takao ;
Okita, Yutaka ;
Tabayashi, Koichi ;
Ueda, Yuichi ;
Yoshida, Kiyoshi .
CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2013, 77 (03) :789-828