Left-Right identification and education in Europe: A contingent relationship

被引:14
作者
Dunn, Kris [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
education; ideology; political identity; left-right identification; socialization thesis; core values thesis; ATTITUDES; RESISTANCE; TOLERANCE; REDISTRIBUTION; IDEOLOGY; AMERICAN; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1057/cep.2010.17
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
In the American research tradition, education has long been argued to push one toward a liberal political ideology. Traditionally, education has been associated with the upper classes of society and thereby with a more right-wing, conservative political ideology. Recent research demonstrates an inconsistent relationship between the ideological leaning of various political attitudes and education. This article reviews current theory on education and ideology and finds three perspectives dominate the literature: self-interest theses, developmental theses and socialization theses. Self-interest theories follow the traditional association of education with the upper classes and thereby with right-wing ideology. Developmental theses argue that education contributes to liberal political attitudes by stimulating cognitive development and expanding an individual's perspective. Socialization theses argue that education contributes to political attitudes by social learning processes. A specific example of a socialization perspective is the core values thesis. This thesis argues that education propagates the transmission of a society's core values. To this thesis, I add that an individual's personality is important in this process. As such I test a three-way interaction which provides support for the modified core values thesis: personality and context interact to influence the ideological leaning of our political attitudes. Comparative European Politics (201 1) 9, 292-316. doi:10.1057/cep.2010.17
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 316
页数:25
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[2]  
Alesina A., 2004, FIGHTING POVERTY US
[3]  
Andersen R., 2003, French Politics, V1, P83
[4]  
Barnes S.H., 1979, POLITICAL ACTION MAS
[5]   New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions [J].
Beck, T ;
Clarke, G ;
Groff, A ;
Keefer, P ;
Walsh, P .
WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 15 (01) :165-176
[6]   Which matters most? Comparing the impact of issues and the economy in American, British and Canadian elections [J].
Blais, A ;
Turgeon, M ;
Gidengil, E ;
Nevitte, N ;
Nadeau, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 34 :555-563
[7]  
Bowler Shaun., 2003, Electoral reform and minority representation: local experiments with alternative elections
[8]   Distribution and redistribution in postindustrial democracies [J].
Bradley, D ;
Huber, E ;
Moller, S ;
Nielsen, F ;
Stephens, JD .
WORLD POLITICS, 2003, 55 (02) :193-+
[9]   Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses [J].
Brambor, T ;
Clark, WR ;
Golder, M .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2006, 14 (01) :63-82
[10]   Hypothesis testing and multiplicative interaction terms [J].
Braumoeller, BF .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2004, 58 (04) :807-820