Decompression of Lumbar Central Spinal Canal Stenosis Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:14
|
作者
Khalifeh, Jawad M. [1 ]
Massie, Lara W. [3 ]
Dibble, Christopher F. [2 ]
Dorward, Ian G. [2 ]
Macki, Mohamed [3 ]
Khandpur, Umang [2 ]
Alshohatee, Kafa [3 ]
Jain, Deeptee [4 ]
Chang, Victor [3 ]
Ray, Wilson Z. [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol Surg, 660 South Euclid Ave,Campus Box 8057, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Neurol Surg, Detroit, MI USA
[4] Washington Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sch Med, St Louis, MO USA
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2021年 / 34卷 / 08期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
minimally invasive lumbar fusion; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; MIS-TLIF; lumbar spinal canal stenosis; indirect decompression; INDIRECT FORAMINAL DECOMPRESSION; METAANALYSIS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000001192
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: This was a retrospective clinical series. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate radiologic changes in central spinal canal dimensions following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) with placement of a static or an expandable interbody device. Summary of Background Data: MIS-TLIF is used to treat lumbar degenerative diseases and low-grade spondylolisthesis. MIS-TLIF enables direct and indirect decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis, with patients experiencing relief from radiculopathy and neurogenic claudication. However, the effects of MIS-TLIF on the central spinal canal are not well-characterized. Materials and Methods: We identified patients who underwent MIS-TLIF for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and concurrent moderate to severe spinal stenosis. We selected patients who had both preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and upright lateral radiographs of the lumbar spine. Measurements on axial T2-weighted MRI scans include anteroposterior and transverse dimensions of the dural sac and osseous spinal canal. Measurements on radiographs include disk height, neural foraminal height, segmental lordosis, and spondylolisthesis. We made pairwise comparisons between each of the central canal dimensions and lumbar sagittal segmental radiologic outcome measures relative to their corresponding preoperative values. Correlation coefficients were used to quantify the association between changes in lumbar sagittal segmental parameters relative to changes in radiologic outcomes of central canal dimensions. Statistical analysis was performed for "all patients" and further stratified by interbody device subgroups (static and expandable). Results: Fifty-one patients (age 60.4 y, 68.6% female) who underwent MIS-TLIF at 55 levels (65.5% at L4-L5) were included in the analysis. Expandable interbody devices were used in 45/55 (81.8%) levels. Mean duration from surgery to postoperative MRI scan was 16.5 months (SD 11.9). MIS-TLIF was associated with significant improvements in dural sac dimensions (anteroposterior +0.31 cm, transverse +0.38 cm) and osseous spinal canal dimensions (anteroposterior +0.16 cm, transverse +0.32 cm). Sagittal lumbar segmental parameters of disk height (+0.56 cm), neural foraminal height (+0.35 cm), segmental lordosis (+4.26 degrees), and spondylolisthesis (-7.5%) were also improved following MIS-TLIF. We did not find meaningful associations between the changes in central canal dimensions relative to the corresponding changes in any of the sagittal lumbar segmental parameters. Stratified analysis by interbody device type (static and expandable) revealed similar within-group changes as in the overall cohort and minimal between-group differences. Conclusions: MIS-TLIF is associated with radiologic decompression of neural foraminal and central spinal canal stenosis. The mechanism for neural foraminal and central canal decompression is likely driven by a combination of direct and indirect corrective techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:E439 / E449
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Lin, Lu
    Liu, Xiao-Qin
    Shi, Lei
    Cheng, Si
    Wang, Zhi-Qiang
    Ge, Qi-Jun
    Gao, Ding-Zhi
    Ismail, Amadou Cheffou
    Ke, Zhen-Yong
    Chu, Lei
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [2] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Ahn, Junyoung
    Tabaraee, Ehsan
    Singh, Kern
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (06): : 222 - 225
  • [3] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Hoffmann, Christoph-Heinrich
    Kandziora, Frank
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2020, 32 (03): : 180 - 191
  • [4] Microendoscopic discectomy versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis
    Yi, Weihong
    Tang, Yu
    Yang, Dazhi
    Huang, Wenhua
    Liu, Huan
    Sun, Ziqi
    Yao, Yuan
    Zhou, Yue
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (24) : E20743
  • [5] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Elboghdady, Islam M.
    Naqvi, Abbas
    Jorgenson, Anton Y.
    Marquez-Lara, Alejandro
    Singh, Kern
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2014, 2 (10)
  • [6] Minimally invasive unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of spinal stenosis and modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Chen, Kevin S.
    Than, Khoi D.
    LaMarca, Frank
    Park, Paul
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35
  • [7] A Comparison of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Decompression Alone for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Chan, Andrew Kai-Hong
    Bisson, Erica F.
    Bydon, Mohamad
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Foley, Kevin T.
    Shaffrey, Christopher I.
    Potts, Eric A.
    Shaffrey, Mark E.
    Coric, Domagoj
    Knightly, John J.
    Park, Paul
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Fu, Kai-Ming G.
    Slotkin, Jonathan
    Asher, Anthony L.
    Virk, Michael S.
    Kerezoudis, Panagiotis
    Alvi, Mohammed A.
    Guan, Jian
    Haid, Regis W.
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 66 : 121 - 122
  • [8] A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Chan, Andrew K.
    Bisson, Erica F.
    Bydon, Mohamad
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Foley, Kevin T.
    Potts, Eric A.
    Shaffrey, Christopher, I
    Shaffrey, Mark E.
    Coric, Domagoj
    Knightly, John J.
    Park, Paul
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Fu, Kai-Ming
    Slotkin, Jonathan R.
    Asher, Anthony L.
    Virk, Michael S.
    Kerezoudis, Panagiotis
    Alvi, Mohammed Ali
    Guan, Jian
    Haid, Regis W.
    Mummaneni, Praveen, V
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2019, 46 (05)
  • [9] Comparison of lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression and minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for one-level lumbar spinal stenosis
    Hua, Wenbin
    Wang, Bingjin
    Ke, Wencan
    Wu, Xinghuo
    Zhang, Yukun
    Li, Shuai
    Yang, Shuhua
    Yang, Cao
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [10] Comparison of lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression and minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for one-level lumbar spinal stenosis
    Wenbin Hua
    Bingjin Wang
    Wencan Ke
    Xinghuo Wu
    Yukun Zhang
    Shuai Li
    Shuhua Yang
    Cao Yang
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21