How precisely can we anticipate seismic intensities? A study of uncertainty of anticipated seismic intensities for the Earthquake Early Warning method in Japan

被引:29
作者
Hoshiba, Mitsuyuki [1 ]
Ohtake, Kazuo [1 ]
Iwakiri, Kazuhiro [1 ]
Aketagawa, Tamotsu [2 ]
Nakamura, Hiromitsu [3 ]
Yamamoto, Shunroku [4 ]
机构
[1] Meteorol Res Inst, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3050052, Japan
[2] Japan Meteorol Agcy, Chiyoda Ku, Tokyo 1008122, Japan
[3] Natl Res Inst Earth Sci & Disaster Prevent, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3050006, Japan
[4] Railway Tech Res Inst, Tokyo 1858540, Japan
来源
EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE | 2010年 / 62卷 / 08期
关键词
Earthquake Early Warning; seismic intensity; prediction of ground motion; uncertainty;
D O I
10.5047/eps.2010.07.013
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The precise calculation of anticipated seismic intensity is an important component of Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) procedures. The EEW method adopted by the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) uses event magnitude, hypocentral distance, and site amplification factor for this calculation, in which the site amplification factor is represented by a single scalar without consideration of spectrum contents. Even when two earthquakes occur at the same location with the same magnitude, their observed distributions of seismic intensity are not always the same. And even at adjacent measurement stations, the interstation difference in seismic intensity of one earthquake is not always the same as that of another earthquake. To evaluate these expected uncertainties in the current JMA EEW method, we analyzed the distribution of recorded seismic intensities from adjacent earthquakes and also compared the intensities at adjacent observation sites. The uncertainties are 0.29 JMA intensity units when the JMA magnitude is used as an index of source factor and 0.22 when the average of the observed seismic intensities is used. The uncertainties are 0.21 when site amplification factor is represented by single scalar value. These results may indicate the intrinsic precision limits of anticipated seismic intensities in the current JMA EEW method.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 620
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   A study on warning algorithms for Istanbul earthquake early warning system [J].
Alcik, Hakan ;
Ozel, Oguz ;
Apaydin, Nurdan ;
Erdik, Mustafa .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2009, 36
[2]   Real-time earthquake detection and hazard assessment by ElarmS across California [J].
Allen, Richard M. ;
Brown, Holly ;
Hellweg, Margaret ;
Khainovski, Oleg ;
Lombard, Peter ;
Neuhauser, Douglas .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2009, 36
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Eos Trans. AGU, DOI DOI 10.1029/2008EO080001
[4]   Single-station sigma [J].
Atkinson, GM .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2006, 96 (02) :446-455
[5]   Limits for the improvement of ground-motion relations in Europe and the Middle East by accounting for site effects [J].
Bragato, P. L. .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2008, 98 (04) :2061-2065
[6]   How accurate can strong ground motion attenuation relations be? [J].
Douglas, J ;
Smit, PM .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 91 (06) :1917-1923
[7]  
Espinosa ArandaJ M., 1995, SEISMOL RES LETT, V66, P42, DOI [DOI 10.1785/GSSRL.66.6.42, 10.1785/gssrl.66.6.42]
[8]   An automatic processing system for broadcasting earthquake alarms [J].
Horiuchi, S ;
Negishi, H ;
Abe, K ;
Kamimura, A ;
Fujinawa, Y .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2005, 95 (02) :708-718
[9]   Fluctuation of wave amplitude even when assuming convolution of source, path and site factors - effect of rupture directivity [J].
Hoshiba, M .
PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS, 2003, 137 (1-4) :45-65
[10]   Development of earthquake early warning system in Taiwan [J].
Hsiao, Nai-Chi ;
Wu, Yih-Min ;
Shin, Tzay-Chyn ;
Zhao, Li ;
Teng, Ta-Liang .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2009, 36