Does increasing investment in research and development promote economic growth decoupling from carbon emission growth? An empirical analysis of BRICS countries

被引:267
作者
Wang, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Fuyu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr East China, Sch Econ & Management, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Petr East China, Inst Energy Econ & Policy, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Research and development investment; Carbon emission; BRICS; Urbanization; Decoupling; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; UNIT-ROOT TESTS; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; PANEL-DATA; DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; IMPACT FACTORS; ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119853
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
It is generally recognized that increasing research and development investment is an effective measure to promote economic and social progress. An open question is if increasing research and development investment help economic growth decoupling from carbon emission. This study investigates research and development investment and carbon emission in BRICS countries by using the Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares for empirical estimation from 1996 to 2014. The results show that every 1% increase in research and development investment, carbon emissions will be decreased by 0.8122% for the BRICS as a whole, which indicates increasing research and development investment has a positive impact on decoupling economic growth from environmental pressure. For individual, this impact is most significant in China, weak in Russia and India. However, it also should be noted that only increasing research and development investment cannot achieve the decoupling between economic growth and carbon emission, because other factors, such as economic activity, industrialization and urbanization, renewable energy also influences the decoupling economic growth from carbon emission. The results also show that economic activity, industrialization and urbanization pose negative impact on the decoupling, whereas renewable energy consumption promote the decoupling. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 77 条
[11]   Unveiling the dynamic relation between R&D and emission abatement National and sectoral innovation perspectives from the EU [J].
Corradini, Massimiliano ;
Costantini, Valeria ;
Mancinelli, Susanna ;
Mazzanti, Massimiliano .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 102 :48-59
[12]   Global energy use: Decoupling or convergence? [J].
Csereklyei, Zsuzsanna ;
Stern, David I. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 51 :633-641
[13]   Decomposing the decoupling of CO2 emissions and economic growth in Brazil [J].
de Freitas, Luciano Charlita ;
Kaneko, Shinji .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (08) :1459-1469
[14]  
Destek M.A., 2019, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser., P1
[15]  
Dhakal S., 2002, ENV SYSTEMS RES, V30, P295, DOI [10.2208/proer.30.295, DOI 10.2208/PROER.30.295]
[16]   Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy [J].
Dogan, Eyup ;
Seker, Fahri .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 94 :429-439
[17]   Impact of natural gas consumption on CO2 emissions: Panel data evidence from China's provinces [J].
Dong, Kangyin ;
Sun, Renjin ;
Hochman, Gal ;
Zeng, Xiangang ;
Li, Hui ;
Jiang, Hongdian .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 162 :400-410
[18]   COINTEGRATION AND ERROR CORRECTION - REPRESENTATION, ESTIMATION, AND TESTING [J].
ENGLE, RF ;
GRANGER, CWJ .
ECONOMETRICA, 1987, 55 (02) :251-276
[19]   System dynamics modeling for urban energy consumption and CO2 emissions: A case study of Beijing, China [J].
Feng, Y. Y. ;
Chen, S. Q. ;
Zhang, L. X. .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2013, 252 :44-52
[20]  
GRAY D., 2006, Decoupling the link between economic growth, transport growth and carbon emissions in Scotland