Electric charge requirements of pediatric cochlear implant recipients enrolled in the childhood development after cochlear implantation study

被引:17
作者
Zwolan, Teresa A. [1 ]
O'Sullivan, Mary Beth [1 ]
Fink, Nancy E.
Niparko, John K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
C level; cochlear implant; electric charge; pediatric-mapping;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0b013e318161aac7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate mapping characteristics of children with cochlear implants who are enrolled in the Childhood Development After Cochlear Implantation (CDACI) multicenter study. Study Design: Longitudinal evaluation during 24 months of speech processor maps of children with cochlear implants prospectively enrolled in the study. Setting: Six tertiary referral centers. Subjects: One hundred eighty-eight children enrolled in the CDACI study who were 5 years old or younger at the time of enrollment. Of these children, 184 received unilateral implants, and 4 received simultaneous bilateral implants. Intervention: Children attended regular mapping sessions at their implant clinic as part of the study protocol. Maps were examined for each subject at 4 different time intervals: at device activation and 6, 12, and 24 months postactivation. Main Outcome Measures: Mean C/M levels (in charge per phase) were compared for 4 different time intervals, for 3 different devices, for 6 different implant centers, and for children with normal and abnormal cochleae. Results: All 3 types of implant devices demonstrate significant increases in C/M levels between device activation and the 24-month appointment. Significant differences in mean C/M levels were noted between devices. Children with cochlear anomalies demonstrate significantly greater C/M levels than children With normal cochleae. Conclusion: The CDACI study has enabled us to evaluate the mapping characteristics of pediatric patients who use 3 different devices and were implanted at a variety of implant centers. Analysis of such data enables us to better understand the mapping characteristics of children with cochlear implants.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 148
页数:6
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Relationship between EABR thresholds and levels used to program the CLARION® speech processor [J].
Brown, CJ ;
Lopez, SM ;
Hughes, ML ;
Abbas, PJ .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1999, 108 (04) :50-57
[2]  
Fink Nancy E, 2007, Cochlear Implants Int, V8, P92, DOI 10.1002/cii.333
[3]   Effects of stimulus level on speech perception with cochlear prostheses [J].
Franck, KH ;
Xu, L ;
Pfingst, BE .
JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2003, 4 (01) :49-59
[4]  
Gordon K, 2004, INT J AUDIOL, V43, pS28
[5]  
OVERSTREET E, 2000, ANN M ASS RES OT FEB
[6]   Across-site variation in detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels for cochlear implants [J].
Pfingst, BE ;
Xu, L .
JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2004, 5 (01) :11-24
[7]   Effects of stimulus level on electrode-place discrimination in human subjects with cochlear implants [J].
Pfingst, BE ;
Holloway, LA ;
Zwolan, TA ;
Collins, LM .
HEARING RESEARCH, 1999, 134 (1-2) :105-115
[8]  
Shallop J K, 1995, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, V166, P175