Acute cholecystitis: is it still justified to delay surgery?

被引:5
作者
Calero Garcia, Purificacion [1 ]
Ruiz Tovar, Jaime [1 ]
Sanjuanbenito Dehesa, Alfonso [1 ]
Calero Amaro, Alicia [1 ]
Diez Tabernilla, Maria [1 ]
Latorre Fragua, Raquel [1 ]
Housari Martin, Gada [1 ]
Martinez Molina, Enrique [1 ]
Fresneda Moreno, Virgilio [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Ramon & Cajal, Dept Cirugia Gen & Digest, E-28034 Madrid, Spain
来源
CIRUGIA ESPANOLA | 2010年 / 88卷 / 02期
关键词
Acute cholecystitis; Delayed surgery; Medical treatment; BILE-DUCT STONES; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ciresp.2010.03.008
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Acute cholecystitis treatment may initially be surgical or conservative with subsequent surgery; we reviewed the cases found in our centre, including their treatment and outcome. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective study of treatment in 178 patients with acute cholecystitis during one year. We evaluated variables associated with patient characteristics, as well as clinical data, diagnostic tests, treatment and outcome. Results: The majority (70.2%) was treated conservatively (group A), and 29.8% were operated on in the first 72 h (group B). In group A, 96 patients were treated with antibiotics, 15 with antibiotic therapy and cholecystectomy, and 12 with antibiotics and ERCP. In group B urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 60.4%, and 35.8% had open cholecystectomy. In group A, admission time was 11 days, with satisfactory progress in 79.2%, mortality rate of 5.6% and 10.7% of readmissions. In group B, operation time was 111 +/- 43 min, a mean of 8.7 days hospital stay, and 68% of cases did not require further treatment after surgery. Outcome was satisfactory in all but 7, there was no mortality in this group. We had a return rate of 2%. Conclusions: A significant proportion of conservative treatment was carried out at the expense of emergency surgery, although in absolute numbers conservative treatment seems to have a higher rate of complications, mortality and hospitalisation time. (C) 2009 AEC. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 96
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Does the complication rate increase in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis? [J].
Asoglu, O ;
Ozmen, V ;
Karanlik, H ;
Igci, A ;
Kecer, M ;
Parlak, M ;
Unal, ES .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A, 2004, 14 (02) :81-86
[2]   APPROACH TO THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS - OPEN SURGICAL, LAPAROSCOPIC OR ENDOSCOPIC [J].
CUSCHIERI, A .
ENDOSCOPY, 1993, 25 (06) :397-398
[3]  
FRANCESCHI D, 1993, AM SURGEON, V59, P525
[4]   NATURAL-HISTORY OF ASYMPTOMATIC AND SYMPTOMATIC GALLSTONES [J].
FRIEDMAN, GD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 165 (04) :399-404
[5]   FACTORS INFLUENCING TIMING OF CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS [J].
GARDNER, B ;
MASUR, R ;
FUJIMOTO, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1973, 125 (06) :730-733
[6]  
Gurusamy KS, 2006, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V18
[7]   Factors predictive of bile duct stones in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis [J].
Hammarström, LE ;
Ranstam, J .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 15 (04) :323-327
[8]   Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Is it really safe? [J].
Kum, CK ;
Eypasch, E ;
Lefering, R ;
Paul, A ;
Neugebauer, E ;
Troidl, H .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 20 (01) :43-49
[9]   Early versus delayed-interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis - A metaanalysis [J].
Lau, H ;
Lo, CY ;
Patil, NG ;
Yuen, WK .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2006, 20 (01) :82-87
[10]  
Li J. C. M., 2004, Hong Kong Medical Journal, V10, P389